Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Another Lump Sum vs Monthly Pension Question
Old 04-07-2020, 07:50 AM   #1
Confused about dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 8
Another Lump Sum vs Monthly Pension Question

ER'd 2 years ago with megacorp "exit plan" at 56. Have not started taking pension or lump sum yet as did not immediately need and monthly was growing at decent rate (approx 10% in first year). At about the 18 month mark, I learned megacorp adjusted the mortality tables used for the calc, which erased that 10% growth.

Pension at MC was always reflected as a lump sum every year, with interest and growth based on years of service and salary. Then at time of retirement, forecast into annuity, so not the lump sum "offer" often described.

So now wrestling with the decision of taking the $31K/yr non-cola pension or the $618K lump sum. As suggested in other threads, I did look on immediateannuities.com and to get the same 31K/yr would require just over $700K investment.

Will also point out this is the 100% survivor rate in both cases. DW is 60.

Pension fund is well funded with very solid company.

Lump sum represents approx 23% of total portfolio.

Thoughts welcomed....
ParFour is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 04-07-2020, 08:08 AM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Chicago West Burbs
Posts: 2,998
Nothing changes due to the current financial crisis. If I were to assume that the $31K per year pension was based on a single life and is not "needed" to meet today's expenses I would, (and did) take the lump sum. I would not hesitate giving up 20% annual difference for the benefit of having the ~$24K grow every year (vs the fixed pension), have it continue for my spouse in the event of my demise, and have it part of our estate to benefit our heirs.

In the end, it is a personal decision and is based on an individual's financial picture and desires.
CRLLS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 08:19 AM   #3
Confused about dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 8
CRLLS. The $31K is the 100% survivor rate. $35K would be single life. I'v been leaning in the same direction as you noted, but have been hesitant to pull the trigger for reasons I cannot explain....
ParFour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 08:45 AM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Just_Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Dutchess County
Posts: 1,599
I do the monthly, there is something comforting about waking up on the first of every month to many thousands of dollars in my checking account and upon my demise my DW will have that warm fuzzy feeling also.
Just_Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 09:00 AM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Beach and Mountain
Posts: 1,087
I vote with Just_Steve. You are 58 and I am going to assume that you and DW are in reasonable health. If so, I would take SS at 62 - both of you. And you have that non-cola'd pension of $31k. I am going to assume that combined SS will be $50k, annually. That would be a rounded $80k per year without getting out of bed or touching your portfolio. That would make me sleep well.

Yes, you will wrestle with planning for RMD's and backfilling those lower tax brackets. What a fun problem to have.
Z3Dreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 11:53 AM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 5,800
We also choose the monthly pension with 100% survivor, it covers our expenses.
If the pension is well funded, less worry.
It's an individual decision, good luck!
__________________
Give a Man a fish, he will eat for a day.
Teach a Man to fish, he will eat for a lifetime.
pacergal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 12:00 PM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
youbet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,151
Give a lot of thought to the prospects of higher inflation in the coming years for all the obvious reasons.
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
youbet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 12:01 PM   #8
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,201
The math obviously says take the pension, but how secure is the pension funding source? There are pensions that are woefully underfunded these days, and some of those beneficiaries will take a big haircut on their "secure pension," some already have. The answers above all seem to just assume the pension is bulletproof...

I took a lump sum when I retired, as pension* vs lump sum was a wash in my case, and I knew I could grow the lump sum and buy an annuity anytime in the future if I wanted to. And that lump sum is worth way more now, even with the recent downturn I have a 7% annual return on that money. So I could now buy a much larger annuity with the lump sum than I would have had in 2011. Odds are I won't ever buy an annuity, but I have that option if ever needed.

I wouldn't make any decision without studying how secure the pension or annuity was. They are not guaranteed, some major providers would have gone under in 2008-2009 if left to their own devices. And how insurers and pension funds will fare in this downturn is TBD.

* actually just an annuity they would have purchased on my behalf
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 12:08 PM   #9
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Berkeley, Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 1,406
Take the lump sum.
You never know about "very solid company".
You will sleep better at night.
davebarnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 12:15 PM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,004
I'm receiving close to your $31k/yr non-cola pension (life policy). In my case, I was offered a lump sum of $249k or about 40% of what an annuity would have required at the time. For me, it was a no-brainer to take the pension. An 88% offer, as in your case, I would have seriously considered it.

That said, my pension and DW's SS (she's 67) covers pretty much all of our living expenses. WR is something ridiculously small, less than 0.25%. If necessary, I can start SS in a year. While I would have preferred a lump sum close to the annuity value, I can't complain given our current financial situation.
statsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 12:39 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
Essentially, with the pension, they are offering you a contract with a fair market value of $700k for $618k.... I'd take the free money (the pension) and adjust your AA accordingly.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 12:41 PM   #12
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Flyover America
Posts: 679
Do you know how tax impacts the lump sum? The annuity may or may not have state tax depending on your state, it will be taxed at federal level.

I have a pension but did not have an option for a lump sum. I like having a "paycheck" but also realize that if you figure you will place the lump sum in a fixed income safe investment (2% return) you could likely pay out $31,000 for 24 years from the lump sum if zero tax is owed at the lump sum, than the pension starts returning more potentially.

Nice to have options.
capjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 12:45 PM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
capjak, usually the lump sum sum is rolled over into a traditional IRA and there are no federal or state tax implications.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 12:51 PM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
jollystomper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 6,129
I also had a choice of lump sum vs annuity for non-cola pension. I chose the annuity to have another retirement income stream beyond my investments. It also covers the majority of our normal living expenses. Yes there is the inflation danger but I will risk it, since SS is inflation adjusted.


Edited to add: it will also make things easier for my DW should I die first, as she is not financially savvy. A pension and SS will more than cover her expenses and simplify what she has to deal with financially.
__________________
FIREd date: June 26, 2018 - "This Happy Feeling, Going Round and Round!" (GQ)
jollystomper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 04:10 PM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
The Cosmic Avenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 2,654
If you don't need the money for a while, I'd be inclined to take the lump sum and invest it into the market during this downturn. It wouldn't take long until you could safely take $31K/year, plus then you'd still have the principal.
__________________
-Looking to FIRE in the mid-2020s, which would be our mid-50s.
The Cosmic Avenger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 04:15 PM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cosmic Avenger View Post
If you don't need the money for a while, I'd be inclined to take the lump sum and invest it into the market during this downturn. It wouldn't take long until you could safely take $31K/year, plus then you'd still have the principal.
And how do you know this?
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 05:23 PM   #17
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 16
I just made a similar decision based upon receiving a similar sized pension and took the lump sum. Here was my logic YMMV. Company pension like 80% funded (some risk there) but what really concerned me is that if I died before taking the pension my spouse would only get 50% survivor rate (the default). But if I started the pension I had many choices.
Single Life
10 Yrs Garanteed
50%
75%
100% Survivor

Waiting until max age of 70 would have more than doubled the monthly payout. But If something happened suddenly my DW would be stuck with 50%. I took the lump sum as now I do not need to touch it for years but I am confident I can invest it wisely.

Just my thoughts.
breger1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 05:56 PM   #18
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,281
I took the pension. I worry from time to time about the funding. But, when I get the money I never worry about my expenses. It does keep my worrying down in times like this. Research also suggests that people receiving pensions have less stress.

With this 10 year run, I expect I would have had more money had I taken the lump sum. But, for me, I have more money than I expected and still have the comfort of money magically appearing in my checking account that allows me to live the lifestyle I want.

Having said all this, it was not an easy call.
savory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2020, 06:08 PM   #19
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Western NC
Posts: 4,607
Take the $31k annual with 100% survivor...as another poster noted, that plus SS at age 62 probably covers your regular expenses.
ncbill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2020, 08:26 AM   #20
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 388
I was faced with the same decision last May. I decided on the lump sum because the 50% survivor option wasn't a good deal based on all my calculations. I am in the process of executing a plan to put the funds into stocks and bonds over a 1 year period. My last deployment is May 1, 2020. Right now I stand at -1% on the whole bucket... I'm using a 25/75 allocation for these funds. Fortunately I did a buy last month when both stocks and bonds were getting creamed...value averaging in worked for that purchase. I don't need these funds for a long time, if ever, so I'm aggressively doing Roth conversions now to take advantage of lower share prices in the equity market. Not the greatest outcome so far but not a disaster either. I will report back in 10 years to let everyone know how things are going

One thing I will say, the comments I see on this topic recently are a quite a bit different from what I was reading a year ago. I'm still in the camp of safety first....meaning if that stream of income is a significant portion of your retirement spend, it may be a better option to take the pension payout. Otherwise it's most likely a better time than last year to take the payout....then again, maybe not.
__________________
FIRE'd---4/27/2018 @ 54. DW--RE date 03/01/19.
tdv2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lump sum versus monthly pension? Andy Sr Hi, I am... 20 06-26-2016 05:24 AM
Another pension lump sum vs. monthly payment question robls FIRE and Money 11 02-08-2011 03:52 PM
Monthly Pension or Lump Sum? bob boag Hi, I am... 17 08-06-2010 10:14 AM
monthly pension vs. lump sum kbst FIRE and Money 25 11-20-2007 04:31 PM
Pension: Lump Sum or Monthly Payment ? Helena FIRE and Money 12 09-07-2006 09:00 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:36 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.