Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Asset Allocation Changes - Which Bond Funds
Old 01-28-2020, 03:12 PM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 283
Asset Allocation Changes - Which Bond Funds

Getting much closer to FIRE - probably late 2020 or perhaps early 2021 depending on how many more days I'm willing to stay with MegaCorp and all the BS that goes along with that...

My portfolio mix has been 70/30 for the last 10 years and it's been a great ride as we all know. I'm ready to dial things back now and looking at a 60/40 or even 50/50 mix going forward as I want to lock-in some gains and reduce some risk. Age is 56 now and likely to unplug at 57 unless something dramatic changes. I know all the 100/110/120 minus age formulas and feel comfortable with no more than 60% equities (VTI, VNQ, etc.).

That said - my current 30% is split between two Vanguard US Gov't funds - VIPSX and VUSTX. I'm strongly considering moving away from these into an even mix of short/intermediate/long ETFs like Vanguard BSV, BIV and BLV.

Thoughts? I'm not nearly as experienced with bonds as I am with stocks and looking for insights into why one type vs. another.
Yipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 01-29-2020, 06:14 AM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yipper View Post
Getting much closer to FIRE - probably late 2020 or perhaps early 2021 depending on how many more days I'm willing to stay with MegaCorp and all the BS that goes along with that...

My portfolio mix has been 70/30 for the last 10 years and it's been a great ride as we all know. I'm ready to dial things back now and looking at a 60/40 or even 50/50 mix going forward as I want to lock-in some gains and reduce some risk. Age is 56 now and likely to unplug at 57 unless something dramatic changes. I know all the 100/110/120 minus age formulas and feel comfortable with no more than 60% equities (VTI, VNQ, etc.).

That said - my current 30% is split between two Vanguard US Gov't funds - VIPSX and VUSTX. I'm strongly considering moving away from these into an even mix of short/intermediate/long ETFs like Vanguard BSV, BIV and BLV.

Thoughts? I'm not nearly as experienced with bonds as I am with stocks and looking for insights into why one type vs. another.
Why not total US bond?
mrfeh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2020, 07:49 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
+1 I was thinking the same thing even though I currently prefer CDs because of interest rate risk.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2020, 07:56 AM   #4
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrfeh View Post
Why not total US bond?
Good question - looking at returns it seems an even blended mix of short/intermediate/long performs better than the total fund/etf. That was my only decision point - what am I missing doing that?
Yipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2020, 08:06 AM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
You would need to dive deep but any disparity in return is probably a result of disparity in risk.... my guess would be that the blended credit risk of the 3 funds is a tad higher than the credit risk of BND.... there is no such thing as a free lunch.

BND's ER is 0.035% vs 0.07% for the others but that isn't a huge difference.

https://personal.vanguard.com/us/fun...vigatingFrom=6
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2020, 08:08 AM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 38,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yipper View Post
Getting much closer to FIRE - probably late 2020 or perhaps early 2021 depending on how many more days I'm willing to stay with MegaCorp and all the BS that goes along with that...

My portfolio mix has been 70/30 for the last 10 years and it's been a great ride as we all know. I'm ready to dial things back now and looking at a 60/40 or even 50/50 mix going forward as I want to lock-in some gains and reduce some risk. Age is 56 now and likely to unplug at 57 unless something dramatic changes. I know all the 100/110/120 minus age formulas and feel comfortable with no more than 60% equities (VTI, VNQ, etc.).

That said - my current 30% is split between two Vanguard US Gov't funds - VIPSX and VUSTX. I'm strongly considering moving away from these into an even mix of short/intermediate/long ETFs like Vanguard BSV, BIV and BLV.

Thoughts? I'm not nearly as experienced with bonds as I am with stocks and looking for insights into why one type vs. another.
I think you can skip the long bond ETF, and use short and intermediate only.

I do not believe there is a efficient frontier curve benefit to using long bonds, and that staying shorter and high quality works better.

I use short and intermediate index funds. Mostly intermediate, but I keep a good chunk in short-term index because I like to manage my duration and have some staging/laddering. So I have cash/short term CDs, short-term bond index and intermediate bond index.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2020, 11:53 AM   #7
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by audreyh1 View Post
I think you can skip the long bond ETF, and use short and intermediate only.

I do not believe there is a efficient frontier curve benefit to using long bonds, and that staying shorter and high quality works better.

I use short and intermediate index funds. Mostly intermediate, but I keep a good chunk in short-term index because I like to manage my duration and have some staging/laddering. So I have cash/short term CDs, short-term bond index and intermediate bond index.
Thanks audreyh1 - what's the reason to skip long bond? apologies for my lack of knowledge of bonds here... it's probably obvious.

I currently have a good sized stash of cash (reserved living expenses) in an ultra short-term bond fund... thinking it's safe and returns more than money market.
Yipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2020, 12:13 PM   #8
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 38,001
The Frank Armstrong papers on asset allocation available on the internet very long ago (but haven’t seen for a long while now) demonstrated that long bonds didn’t really provide that much diversification benefit compared to short term. Maybe it’s because they get hit so much harder and take longer to recover during rising interest rate periods. Armstrong felt that staying short-term (duration around 2.6 years) high qualify was best overall.

I have tended to use a combination of cash equivalents, short-term bond fund and intermediate term bond fund on the principle that if I were to draw exclusively on fixed income for a number of years, the cash can cover a couple of years, which gives short-term bond fund a couple of years to recover if needed, and then intermediate term bond fund around 5 years to recover, if needed.

And I have never invested in a long term bond fund. My index funds surely hold some, but I aim for an overall short to intermediate duration.

Ultra short-term bond funds - maybe they are better now, but some were severely hurt during the 2008 credit crisis, as they did not hold very high quality paper, so you have to pay attention to that.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Managed Bond Funds rather than Index Bond Funds? ER Eddie FIRE and Money 69 03-18-2019 10:27 AM
What do you think about Multi Asset Bond Funds instead of Core Bond Funds Glad to be retired Active Investing, Market Strategies & Alternative Assets 2 10-24-2017 09:41 AM
Bond/FI Allocation Changes? eytonxav FIRE and Money 22 10-04-2016 05:48 PM
making asset allocation changes DEC-1982 FIRE and Money 12 01-17-2016 09:33 AM
Gradual Changes in Asset Allocation TromboneAl FIRE and Money 29 01-07-2008 01:20 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:48 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.