questions, questions, questions...
Ahhhhh....the sweet illusion of prosperity that only massive debt can provide. Ugly realities are best left for future generations, IMO.
So...the gov't is going to restore confidence in American financial institutions by:
(1) declaring the American financial ecosystem to be a gigantic Superfund site, and
(2) suspending the 'mark-to-market' rule. Anybody know how assets will be valued if not by mark-to-market?
I'm confused. Numerous talking heads in the White House, Congress, and the media said that the sharp drop in the stock market when Bailout Bill #1 failed was 'proof' that something needed to be done. So, Bailout Bill #2 passes and we have another drop in the stock market. WTF? Where's the euphoria?
What does it mean if the stock market does not skyrocket within the next few weeks? Does it mean that fluctuations in the stock market should not be used as the basis for formulating, marketing, and evaluating the efficacy of public policy? Does it mean that taxpayer money should be spent in a way that enhances the ability of American workers and enterprises to generate value and thus compete successfully on the world stage, rather than be spent in the hope of goosing stock market values for a bit?
Ahhhhh....the sweet illusion of prosperity that only massive debt can provide. Ugly realities are best left for future generations, IMO.
So...the gov't is going to restore confidence in American financial institutions by:
(1) declaring the American financial ecosystem to be a gigantic Superfund site, and
(2) suspending the 'mark-to-market' rule. Anybody know how assets will be valued if not by mark-to-market?
I'm confused. Numerous talking heads in the White House, Congress, and the media said that the sharp drop in the stock market when Bailout Bill #1 failed was 'proof' that something needed to be done. So, Bailout Bill #2 passes and we have another drop in the stock market. WTF? Where's the euphoria?
What does it mean if the stock market does not skyrocket within the next few weeks? Does it mean that fluctuations in the stock market should not be used as the basis for formulating, marketing, and evaluating the efficacy of public policy? Does it mean that taxpayer money should be spent in a way that enhances the ability of American workers and enterprises to generate value and thus compete successfully on the world stage, rather than be spent in the hope of goosing stock market values for a bit?