|
|
07-25-2011, 01:34 PM
|
#1
|
Dryer sheet wannabe
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 14
|
Bond Funds for income?
I was wondering what people think about using bond funds for income?
Or is this just not the right time?
When I look at 10 year charts, I don't see bond funds losing money.
What is wrong with setting up bonds funds to generate income? & just churn dividends?
I was thinking:
VFICX
VBMFX
VWEHX
FKINX
PRHYX
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
07-25-2011, 01:41 PM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
|
Of course one should use bond funds for income. Why else invest in them? Yes, they should not be as volatile as equities and thus are less risky as equities, but if they didn't provide dividends, no one would invest in them.
|
|
|
07-25-2011, 10:44 PM
|
#3
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 862
|
I elected to create my own bond ladder by buying individual bonds of staggered maturities. Presently have bonds maturing every year from 2012 through 2019.
As a bond matures ( or is called ), I would need to scramble a little to find a replacement issue. had a few bad decisions and chose to sell bonds for a loss, but thankfully these were not a frequent occurrence.
The bummer in this is that BBB+ and above bonds pay only a pittance right now - about 2-3% for maturities of 2018/2019. Not that attractive.
|
|
|
07-25-2011, 11:15 PM
|
#4
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,698
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyEarlyRetirementForum
I was wondering what people think about using bond funds for income?
Or is this just not the right time?
When I look at 10 year charts, I don't see bond funds losing money.
What is wrong with setting up bonds funds to generate income? & just churn dividends?
I was thinking:
VFICX
VBMFX
VWEHX
FKINX
PRHYX
|
What you suggest is my ER plan right now and has been since I ERed nearly 3 years ago. (See my signature line.)
When I first began investing in bond funds back in 1990, it was instead of my local bank's MM savings account whose interest rate had dropped from over 7% to maybe 2% in less than 12 months (mid-1989 to early 1990). I knew I was risking principal a bit but the greater rate of return, and tax-exempt (it was a muni bond fund) to boot, was very satisfying.
__________________
Retired in late 2008 at age 45. Cashed in company stock, bought a lot of shares in a big bond fund and am living nicely off its dividends. IRA, SS, and a pension await me at age 60 and later. No kids, no debts.
"I want my money working for me instead of me working for my money!"
|
|
|
07-26-2011, 02:11 AM
|
#5
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,130
|
I get most of the retirement income needed from my investments from bonds in mutual funds. The remainder comes from CD's and savings.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
|
|
|
07-26-2011, 03:09 AM
|
#6
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,193
|
bond funds have little place to go except down with the end of the 30 year bull market coming to an end.
income from the fund while your principal is dropping sucks!
|
|
|
07-26-2011, 04:07 AM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,072
|
Get a book on Bonds and Bond mutual funds. You can probably get a decent one from your public library.
Get acquainted with the basics.
Bond mutual funds and bonds are commonly used for income, portfolio stability, etc.
But there are risks that you should understand.
Here is a page with a link to a VG webcast about this very topic in the context of the current economic and interest rate environment ...
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/insights/article/live-webcast-bond-investing-06242011
|
|
|
07-26-2011, 09:19 AM
|
#8
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alajuela, Costa Rica
Posts: 222
|
I like bond funds over individual bonds because their NAV fluctuates. I'm a strict indexer. Rule one is wide and deep global diversification. Rule two is keep it as cheap as possible. We keep a 60/30/10 retirement portfolio and re-balance according to the following rules.
If any of the major AA components (stocks/bonds/cash) gets out of balance by 5% or more, it gets re-balanced at year's end.
If any of the sub-components inside a major component gets out of balance by 20% or more it gets re-balanced at year's end.
This philosophy forces me to buy low and sell high. It has served us well during 16 years of early retirement and two tremendous market crashes during the last decade.
|
|
|
07-26-2011, 11:24 AM
|
#9
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 360
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by galeno
I like bond funds over individual bonds because their NAV fluctuates. I'm a strict indexer. Rule one is wide and deep global diversification. Rule two is keep it as cheap as possible. We keep a 60/30/10 retirement portfolio and re-balance according to the following rules.
If any of the major AA components (stocks/bonds/cash) gets out of balance by 5% or more, it gets re-balanced at year's end.
If any of the sub-components inside a major component gets out of balance by 20% or more it gets re-balanced at year's end.
This philosophy forces me to buy low and sell high. It has served us well during 16 years of early retirement and two tremendous market crashes during the last decade.
|
Do you use other indices than Vanguard's Total Bond?
|
|
|
07-26-2011, 11:49 AM
|
#10
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 8,827
|
Vanguard Wellesley is a popular alternative here: diverse bonds + 35% (roughly) dividend growth stocks.
__________________
Rich
San Francisco Area
ESR'd March 2010. FIRE'd January 2011.
As if you didn't know..If the above message contains medical content, it's NOT intended as advice, and may not be accurate, applicable or sufficient. Don't rely on it for any purpose. Consult your own doctor for all medical advice.
|
|
|
07-26-2011, 11:52 AM
|
#11
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Citrus Hills
Posts: 235
|
Both the indexing and comment about wide and deep global diversification make sense. With respect to the latter, international bonds particularly corporates and emerging markets require the fund manager to have knowledge, experience, and local networks to get it right. I have index funds, but this is one area I don't mind paying for a proven manager.
|
|
|
07-26-2011, 03:36 PM
|
#12
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alajuela, Costa Rica
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamG
Do you use other indices than Vanguard's Total Bond?
|
We don't use BND because we are US NRAs. BND would cost us 1.1% in portfolio costs (ER=0.11 + USNRA taxes=0.99).
Instead, we use two offshore MANAGED bond funds (ER=0.91%). We don't pay US NRA taxes so we save 10 basis points.
If we were US citizens or residents, we would use two funds: 50% in Vanguard's Wellesey and the other 50% in Wellington. Set and forget.
|
|
|
07-28-2011, 08:39 PM
|
#13
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 360
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by galeno
We don't use BND because we are US NRAs. BND would cost us 1.1% in portfolio costs (ER=0.11 + USNRA taxes=0.99).
Instead, we use two offshore MANAGED bond funds (ER=0.91%). We don't pay US NRA taxes so we save 10 basis points.
If we were US citizens or residents, we would use two funds: 50% in Vanguard's Wellesey and the other 50% in Wellington. Set and forget.
|
Would you really!? They aren't index funds and without small cap or much international do they make your "wide and deep" diversification goal?
|
|
|
07-28-2011, 08:59 PM
|
#14
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 592
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamG
Would you really!? They aren't index funds and without small cap or much international do they make your "wide and deep" diversification goal?
|
Sound familiar
Wellesley 6%, and Wellington 12% foreign holdings - not too bad...
|
|
|
08-08-2011, 02:32 PM
|
#15
|
Dryer sheet wannabe
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 14
|
good video..
----------------------
Tell me more about, "Is this the right time to get into bond funds?"
My problem is The FA/market took a piss on me and I have not had a
return for 4 years.
Really need to set up an income stream, but this market is !!!
|
|
|
08-08-2011, 05:16 PM
|
#16
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,266
|
The biggest problem I have with bond funds at this time is that interest rates are at the lowest point I have ever seen them. In my mind they must go up at some point and when they do bond funds will lose value. I do have some bond funds that have ridden their way up over the past few years as interest rates have fallen. But, I no longer put new money into them because of the risk that interest rates will rise. On the other hand, getting 0.78% on a CD is not exactly a way to make big money. If I wanted to buy a bond fund, I would dollar cost average into it over at least two years.
|
|
|
08-08-2011, 05:22 PM
|
#17
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,266
|
Wellesly is one of the few non index funds I use. I moved some bond money from a bond fund to Wellesly earlier this year. They have gone down but not as badly as the pure stock funds. Down about 1.6% today compare with over 5% for the DOW.
|
|
|
08-08-2011, 05:36 PM
|
#18
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,376
|
Guggenheim recently came out with some "bullet" funds that are held to maturity bond portfolios that mature in a stated year and the proceeds from maturity will be distributed to investors. I'm thinking about laddering them to get the benefits of a ladder but with diversification. Expense ratio is 24 bps plus they are an ETF so there would be commissions on the purchase. Still thinking about these but they would seem to reduce interest rate risk compared to conventional bond funds if you can line up the maturities with your needed cash flow in retirement. Corporate bond funds have maturities from 2011 to 2017. Has anyone looked into these?
|
|
|
08-21-2011, 08:34 PM
|
#19
|
Confused about dryer sheets
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 9
|
Thanks
Guggenheim recently came out with some "bullet" funds that are held to maturity bond portfolios that mature in a stated year and the proceeds from maturity will be distributed to investors. I'm thinking about laddering them to get the benefits of a ladder but with diversification. Expense ratio is 24 bps plus they are an ETF so there would be commissions on the purchase. Still thinking about these but they would seem to reduce interest rate risk compared to conventional bond funds if you can line up the maturities with your needed cash flow in retirement. Corporate bond funds have maturities from 2011 to 2017. Has anyone looked into these?
I haven't looked into them but thanks for the tip, I've been trying to decide whether or not to begin buying individual bonds, these may be just right.
|
|
|
08-22-2011, 03:16 AM
|
#20
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,193
|
whether your bond fund will recover or not from rate increases depends on the type of bond fund and its duration.
john boogle once said he knows of nobody who lost 1 penny in a treasury bond fund of theirs as long as they stayed long enough to meet the duration of that fund.
up until now treasuries had no risk level built in so a credit change would not throw that rule off kilter.
what john is saying is this.
lets say you pay 10 bucks for a share of a bond fund with a duration figure of 5 and were getting 4% interest .
if rates rose to 5% your bond fund would fall to 9.50 but now instead of 4% your getting 5%.. over a 5 year period you would collect an extra 1% a year so even though your fund fell 5% you got an extra 5% intereast over those 5 years equaling your origonal deal the day you bought in at 4%....
as long as you stayed 5 years in that fund you eventually were whole again.
this was only true of treasuries because credit ratings changing were the wild card on corporate bond funds.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|