Soon to be free
Confused about dryer sheets
Look at any business magazine and you will find advertisements for Mutual Funds. The main thing they advertise is how successful the fund has been in the past. They also advertise the quality of the fund company and the managers of the mutual fund.
For example, most people like Vanguard Wellesley and Wellington because they have a good track record. Their managers have been successful at buying and selling stocks and bonds within the fund historically that have given them better returns than the peer funds for years and years.
Now is it possible in the future that the Vanguard Wellesley and Wellington Mutual Funds will crash and burn significantly more than the benchmark of similar funds? Sure, it is possible. But due to historical successes year after year after year, it is unlikely. (Some superstar funds have crashed and burned but the odds are low.)
So why do so many people say it is a bad idea to purchase mutual funds based on Morningstar rates, historical success, and the reputation of the fund company and the managers of the mutual fund?
For example, most people like Vanguard Wellesley and Wellington because they have a good track record. Their managers have been successful at buying and selling stocks and bonds within the fund historically that have given them better returns than the peer funds for years and years.
Now is it possible in the future that the Vanguard Wellesley and Wellington Mutual Funds will crash and burn significantly more than the benchmark of similar funds? Sure, it is possible. But due to historical successes year after year after year, it is unlikely. (Some superstar funds have crashed and burned but the odds are low.)
So why do so many people say it is a bad idea to purchase mutual funds based on Morningstar rates, historical success, and the reputation of the fund company and the managers of the mutual fund?