Ready
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
I'm curious to get opinions on a topic I've wondered about for a while. If you work at a job where you do extensive travel, take clients out frequently for dinners, and run significant business expenses on your personal credit cards, you have the potential to generate substantial rewards. Say for example you have a cash back 2% credit card and you run $100,000 in expenses through the card. Your company reimburses you the full $100,000, and you pocket the $2,000 in rewards.
Is there some threshold where the IRS could deem this to be a source of income that is required to be reported? From the research I've done, the IRS has deemed credit card rewards to be considered a discount on a purchase, and not a source of income. However, it has been silent on the topic of using the card for business expenses, where the entire purchase pre-discount is reimbursed to you by the employer. Is the silence in the tax code just a loophole, or could the IRS make the case that because of the 100% reimbursement you had a duty to report the income?
In the industry I work in, we have hundreds of employees who routinely rack up very large credit card bills, so it has the potential to impact quite a few people if the IRS changed their interpretation on this source of income. Has anyone had any experience with this they can share?
Is there some threshold where the IRS could deem this to be a source of income that is required to be reported? From the research I've done, the IRS has deemed credit card rewards to be considered a discount on a purchase, and not a source of income. However, it has been silent on the topic of using the card for business expenses, where the entire purchase pre-discount is reimbursed to you by the employer. Is the silence in the tax code just a loophole, or could the IRS make the case that because of the 100% reimbursement you had a duty to report the income?
In the industry I work in, we have hundreds of employees who routinely rack up very large credit card bills, so it has the potential to impact quite a few people if the IRS changed their interpretation on this source of income. Has anyone had any experience with this they can share?