 |
|
05-05-2008, 10:10 PM
|
#21
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 85
|
Diversification is never a bad thing. Lots more paperwork, though. And more entries on your tax forms.
|
|
|
 |
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
05-06-2008, 12:18 PM
|
#22
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,321
|
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 12:40 PM
|
#23
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central, Ohio, USA
Posts: 2,635
|
Currently CDARS could not even approach the IR on CD's I have. Also this placement of funds with them (and potentially scattered around the country) still has to be tracked by someone - CDARS? I looked into this program (I received a unsolicited email last year) and IMHO the rate available using "one of their" institutions would have gotten me something south of 5% when I could buy them at PFCU at 6%. And who insures CDARS? This IMHO is not a service I would ever use. I think it is clear you can (with proper ownership designations) never have to use it. Additionally, the first few seconds of the video is a correct but, to be generous, misleading statement - that alone would run me off.
__________________
Vietnam Veteran, CW4 USA, Retired 1979
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 03:55 PM
|
#24
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gearhead Jim
If things get really ugly in the financial world some day, Uncle Sam may decide to change the rules about coverage. Not a likely secnario, but not impossible.
|
Wow, that would be a great way to guarantee a run on banks that makes several of them insolvent...
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 08:27 PM
|
#25
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,071
|
Hmmmm, lets see, insured deposits are paid from multi-billion dollar deposit insurance funds of the FDIC or NCUA (both of which are solvent by any measure), which can be recapitalized by a credit facility from the Federal Financing Bank or the Secretary of Treasury (using public debt transactions like treasury notes and bonds). And each insured deposit is backed by the Full Faith & Credit of the United States, which is, in turn, backed by the taxing power of the Federal Government. Oh, and when the FDIC or NCUA pays an insured deposit, normally by transferring the insured deposit to a solvent insured bank or credit union, the Government then has a priority claim against the assets of the failed bank. So, the Government's claim exposure is never the total face value of the insured deposit.
Yep, there's a lot of risk to an insured deposit (excessive sarcasm intended) -- it's less of a risk than a T-bill.
|
|
|
05-06-2008, 10:16 PM
|
#26
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
Posts: 889
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisC
Hmmmm, lets see, insured deposits are paid from multi-billion dollar deposit insurance funds of the FDIC or NCUA (both of which are solvent by any measure), which can be recapitalized by a credit facility from the Federal Financing Bank or the Secretary of Treasury (using public debt transactions like treasury notes and bonds). And each insured deposit is backed by the Full Faith & Credit of the United States, which is, in turn, backed by the taxing power of the Federal Government. Oh, and when the FDIC or NCUA pays an insured deposit, normally by transferring the insured deposit to a solvent insured bank or credit union, the Government then has a priority claim against the assets of the failed bank. So, the Government's claim exposure is never the total face value of the insured deposit.
Yep, there's a lot of risk to an insured deposit (excessive sarcasm intended) -- it's less of a risk than a T-bill.
|
(2007) "Wow, these mortgage-backed securities are rated AAA, they're really safe."
My sarcastic point is that problems are not always predictable.
For a very small investment in time, and no money, I can get a small measure of increased security. I feel it's worth the minor effort, others are not required to agree.
Spreading the accounts around is also a natural part of my laddering.
|
|
|
05-07-2008, 07:55 AM
|
#27
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,071
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gearhead Jim
(2007) "Wow, these mortgage-backed securities are rated AAA, they're really safe."
My sarcastic point is that problems are not always predictable.
For a very small investment in time, and no money, I can get a small measure of increased security. I feel it's worth the minor effort, others are not required to agree.
Spreading the accounts around is also a natural part of my laddering.
|
And my point is that a federally insured deposit is as safe as a T-Bill, both from a credit worthiness and liquidity standpoint. T-bills are probably beyond the credit rating of AAA. If your insured depository institution fails, your insured deposit is available the next day at another institution (or if the deposit isn't transferred, then the account holder receives a check for the insured amount typically drawn from an account that Uncle Sam has with the Treasury - the same type of check you receive from the IRS for a tax refund or one used to receive from Social Security Adminsistration).
It's good to ladder accounts and to make sure all of your accounts are completely insured, but it's not appropriate to equate the ratings of corporate securities with the credit worthiness and liquidity of a T-bill or federally insured deposit.
For all the problems that the former FSLIC had during the S&L crisis of the 1980's, there was never a crisis in confidence over payment of a federally insured deposit. Problems can be unpredictable but if T-bills or federally insured deposits become less worthy than AAA-rated corporate securities, then our economic security and our financial world has been dramatically altered and we would have a lot more problems to worry about than credit ratings of corporate or government bonds.
|
|
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|