|
|
01-18-2014, 11:24 AM
|
#21
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulligan
NW, I freely admit I am not an investing expert and maybe it's just my cautiousness, but if one has a secure pension, most of its assets are in the stock market. So if I my pension ever needed to be cut it's because the stock market tanked. If my personal money was in stocks it would be tanking too. That is why I have most of my money in CDs and IBonds to diversify from my stock heavy pension fund. Do you believe my thinking wrong or just extra conservative?
|
What you have is counterparty risk, not equity risk. A contemplation of what makes your counterparty blow up would ne in order.
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
- George Orwell
Ezekiel 23:20
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
01-18-2014, 12:23 PM
|
#22
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,821
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by obgyn65
I would say the enemy number one is living beyond your means.
... Inflation in my view is secondary. ...
|
Tautology? If you run out of money, you will be living beyond your means!
So if 30 years of inflation reduces your means (portfolio), and you wanted to maintain your buying power throughout your retirement, I guess you are now 'living beyond your means'. But it wasn't your portfolio that was the problem, it was your spending?
Seems to me inflation is key?
-ERD50
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 12:55 PM
|
#23
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,056
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulligan
NW, I freely admit I am not an investing expert and maybe it's just my cautiousness, but if one has a secure pension, most of its assets are in the stock market. So if I my pension ever needed to be cut it's because the stock market tanked. If my personal money was in stocks it would be tanking too. That is why I have most of my money in CDs and IBonds to diversify from my stock heavy pension fund. Do you believe my thinking wrong or just extra conservative?
|
I'm not a pension expert at all but this had me reaching for the latest annual reports from my private pension schemes and they all have less than 15% invested in equities, and are all over 90% funded. Consequently my AA these days is approaching 50% equities which is where I'd like to keep it going forward.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 01:45 PM
|
#24
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,733
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-Bound
About the "rich cats" here, remember that many do not have pensions. Their spending power may not be any higher than people with one. .... So, we have a mixture of people here, and that makes the conversation more interesting.
|
Back in 1999 at age 39, cocky me wouldn't have traded a million dollars for $40,000 COLA pension from a credit worthy organization. 15 years later, despite a much lower life expectancy, I'd do it in a heart beat.
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 02:33 PM
|
#26
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 162
|
The two points of view always expressed are one needs equities and inflation is the devil. There have been many discussions here though about how inflation that people actually experienced over long periods of time was much lower than the government's CPI. So I recommend trying to calculate your personal inflation rate because that's the only one that matters to you. How can anyone offer advice about the impact of inflation without knowing your personal rate? As far as equities, historical numbers (will they be repeated?) say you should own some to enhance your portfolio, but if you can't handle the inevitable fluctuations, then it's not a place to be. My parents never owned a stock, were very middle class with no big nest egg, had a very small pension, collected SS and lived happily into their mid 80's. Laddered CD's will keep you capturing current rates. I don't remember reading stories about how people were ruined, needed to go back to work and/or became desperate because they managed their money too conservatively during the Great Recession.
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 02:42 PM
|
#27
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by enjoyinglife102
I don't remember reading stories about how people were ruined, needed to go back to work and/or became desperate because they managed their money too conservatively during the Great Recession.
|
Go look at the hapless 1966 retiree's experience instead. Or go look at someone who was 80% long bond starting in the late 60s. Not pretty.
As an ER/ESR at age 40, I am afeared of inflation enough that I decided I would keep my 30 year fixed rate mortgage in place as a hedge.
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
- George Orwell
Ezekiel 23:20
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 03:04 PM
|
#28
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,358
|
I know many people here are Boglehead fans, personally I am more in the Zvi Bodie camp. I bought his Risk Less and Prosper book for my kids to read -
https://www.mint.com/blog/investing/...-bodie-022012/
He favors I bonds and TIPS for inflation protection with stocks okay for your fun money. Bill Bernstein seemed to move more towards this approach, at least for retirees, after the last stock market meltdown.
Here is another article on stocks, retirees and sequence of returns risk, and how to mitigate it with advice from various financial experts -
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/how...8?pagenumber=1
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 03:35 PM
|
#29
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Palma de Mallorca
Posts: 1,419
|
One of the biggest blind spots that people have heading into (early) retirement is looking at risk of their portfolio versus overall risk to their total wealth and income stream. In the case of the OP, who I suspect may have saved hard for many years to acquire his current portfolio, this means accepting that a non-COLA pension (which we're all assuming is what he has) is a huge risk. Worse, it's a risk with a guaranteed downside: the only thing we don't know is how big that risk is. It's 25 years since we worried about non-housing inflation, and we forget how devastating it can be, but to summarise: it's worse than a bear market, because stocks bounce back, but money eaten by inflation is gone forever.
In our case, DW's salary and my pension are slightly more than we will be spending until she retires (probably about four years from now). Then we will draw down from the portfolio to complement our two pensions, which are both fully COLA'ed. But we also want to leave something substantial to our kids, so we are still thinking long-term: we want to protect this chunk of change for 30+ years, which means we ought to be even more into equities than we are (!).
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 03:35 PM
|
#30
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NC Triangle
Posts: 5,807
|
Fear / Greed and AA
Quote:
Originally Posted by daylatedollarshort
I bought his Risk Less and Prosper book for my kids to read -
|
Boy. My parents bought me stuff like bicycles and baseball bats/gloves.
__________________
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 04:00 PM
|
#31
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 47,474
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo
As Clifp says, inflation is enemy #1 in retirement, one that slowly strangles your financial independence if you don't take measures to offset it.
Retiring at 60 is definitely early retirement and the odds are at least one of you will live to be 90+. If your pension isn't COLAd (few are) you'll need some way to help keep up with inflation - and that something is usually investing in stocks in some form, FIRECalc indicates at least 35% to 40%.
I view going all cash for the long term as the boiled frog approach to financial security. By the time you realize you're in hot water it will be too late.
|
+1000
REWahoo's posts always seem so sensible and down to earth. I couldn't agree more.
__________________
Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harbourless immensities. - - H. Melville, 1851.
Happily retired since 2009, at age 61. Best years of my life by far!
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 04:12 PM
|
#32
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,358
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelyman
Boy. My parents bought me stuff like bicycles and baseball bats/gloves.
|
When you were an adult?
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 04:39 PM
|
#33
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
|
Well, if one is risk averse and puts money in CDs, it's not the end of the world, the way I look at it. It's not an irreversible process.
If inflation picks up, and to be fair it has not reared its ugly head so far, it will be gradual. As long as one recognizes the risk, he/she can still diversify out of "safe" money to equities. That is assuming that he/she does not jump into the market at the wrong time just to see it tanks. That's the tough thing about equities that some people cannot handle: the volatility.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)
"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 05:32 PM
|
#34
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by clifp
Back in 1999 at age 39, cocky me wouldn't have traded a million dollars for $40,000 COLA pension from a credit worthy organization. 15 years later, despite a much lower life expectancy, I'd do it in a heart beat.
|
Well, there may come a time when we again will want something higher than a 4% COLA annuity. Yeah, dream on as some people will say.
As I have children and want to leave them something, I am OK with the present 3.5%WR, with COLA I certainly hope. I am willing to give up that 0.5%WR to give my children a chance to ER too, in case they run into trouble with their career later in life.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)
"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 05:36 PM
|
#35
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,358
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-Bound
Well, if one is risk averse and puts money in CDs, it's not the end of the world, the way I look at it. It's not an irreversible process.
If inflation picks up, and to be fair it has not reared its ugly head so far, it will be gradual. As long as one recognizes the risk, he/she can still diversify out of "safe" money to equities. That is assuming that he/she does not jump into the market at the wrong time just to see it tanks. That's the tough thing about equities that some people cannot handle: the volatility.
|
Maybe I am missing something, but isn't it that inflation itself is not so much a problem as negative real return rates? With fixed income ladders and short term bond funds isn't inflation really only an issue when prolonged real interest rates are lagging the inflation rate?
And aren't TIPS and I bonds more of a sure inflation hedge than stocks? It seems like from what I have read and some of the links I posted that there have been extended periods in the past where stocks did not keep up with inflation, and they may or may not do so in the future.
I get if you want to play the odds that a higher equity position will most likely lead to a higher rate of return long term, potentially a much higher rate of return, but I think for just a pure inflation hedge wouldn't that be more investments like delaying SS (since it has a COLA), obtaining a fixed rate mortgage when rates are low, inflation indexed annuities, TIPS and I bonds?
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 05:47 PM
|
#36
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 47,474
|
For the OP: here is an excellent list of books on these topics.
Investment Books
__________________
Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harbourless immensities. - - H. Melville, 1851.
Happily retired since 2009, at age 61. Best years of my life by far!
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 06:19 PM
|
#37
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,821
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by daylatedollarshort
... It seems like from what I have read and some of the links I posted that there have been extended periods in the past where stocks did not keep up with inflation, and they may or may not do so in the future. ....
|
This may be the case, but I think it may not be the point.
I'm mostly just guessing here, but I think the advantages of stocks over a 30-40 year period is that the average higher gains will carry you through a period of high inflation. Those gains may not necessarily occur at the same time as the high inflation hits, but if they occur before and/or after, it helps you overall.
Regardless the reasons, FIRECalc clearly shows that a low stock exposure has been very risky over a 30-40 year time frame.
-ERD50
|
|
|
01-18-2014, 06:35 PM
|
#38
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
|
As I am not obscenely wealthy, I would like to get some gains more than just keeping up with inflation. Historically, a balanced portfolio will carry 4% withdrawal rate through 30 years. Throw in some SS, and one should be safe. I have dialed back the WR to 3.5% to be even safer.
If I were to put my money into something that will barely keep up with inflation, my 3.5% WR would only last me 100/3.5 = 28.6 years. While I may not live beyond that, my wife may. SS alone might be all that she needs, but having nothing else would not let her feel safe. And then, I want to leave something to my children.
I guess if one is really risk averse to stocks, he/she can justify CDs and annuities. As for me, I prefer to have diversification (never 100% in any single thing), and frankly I am quite comfortable holding some equities and do not perceive them as risky compared to anything else. The value of my homes or the price of gold have been going up/down as much or more.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)
"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
|
|
|
01-19-2014, 06:47 AM
|
#39
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: midwestern city
Posts: 4,061
|
Unfortunately my financial modeling skills are not great, but wouldn't a retiree spending 1.75% above his/her SWR be more at risk of depleting his/her assets over 30 years than another retiree who would spend a constant amount of money over 30 years (thus ignoring 1.75% rate of inflation)?
Happy to change my mind on this topic if presented with evidence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by W2R
+1000
REWahoo's posts always seem so sensible and down to earth. I couldn't agree more.
|
__________________
Very conservative with investments. Not ER'd yet, 48 years old. Please do not take anything I write or imply as legal, financial or medical advice directed to you. Contact your own financial advisor, healthcare provider, or attorney for financial, medical and legal advice.
|
|
|
01-19-2014, 07:46 AM
|
#40
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2008
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 8,764
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by obgyn65
Unfortunately my financial modeling skills are not great, but wouldn't a retiree spending 1.75% above his/her SWR be more at risk of depleting his/her assets over 30 years than another retiree who would spend a constant amount of money over 30 years (thus ignoring 1.75% rate of inflation)?
Happy to change my mind on this topic if presented with evidence.
|
I may be mistaking what you are saying. Do you mean that you start out spending, say, $40K/yr, and 30 years later you are still spending $40K/yr? If so, your financial quality of life will be devastated. Even at 1%/yr inflation, you would be living on less than 3/4 what you started with. And I don't think anybody is predicting ongoing 1% inflation. At a more standard 3% you would be living on the equivalent of $16.5K per year. That's below the poverty level.
But, as I said, I may have misinterpreted your example.
__________________
"Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." - Anonymous (not Will Rogers or Sam Clemens)
DW and I - FIREd at 50 (7/06), living off assets
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|