|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
03-13-2014, 03:23 PM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,206
|
Great list, I am sure it will be helpful to many members, thanks.
Now if I could just figure out the best strategy to deal with #17 which I've struggled with for a couple years...
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57
Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 03:25 PM
|
#3
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,266
|
Definitely one to bookmark although I admit my eyes start to glaze ove after a couple pages.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 03:39 PM
|
#4
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Colorado Mountains
Posts: 3,165
|
#16 says I should have taken survivor's benefits at 60 instead of waiting until I retired at 63. I guess I left a few bucks on the table. I had never seen that area clarified. There seemed to be a hint when I went in to the SSA that I should file for those benefits. I said I would not pass the earnings test and they just kind of shrugged their shoulders.
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 03:47 PM
|
#5
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
|
This is a good list to keep handy. Obviously it's a plug for the SS optimization program, but I gotta say I'm inclined to pay for it after reading this list.
Some of the big gotchas that I hadn't considered:
Quote:
17. When it comes to possibly paying federal income taxes on your Social Security benefits, withdrawals from Roth IRAs aren’t counted, but withdrawals from 401(k), 403(b), regular IRAs, and other tax-deferred accounts are. So there may be a significant advantage in a) withdrawing from your tax-deferred accounts after you retire, but before you start collecting Social Security, b) using up your tax-deferred accounts before you withdraw from your Roth accounts, and c) converting your tax-deferred accounts to Roth IRA holdings after or even before you retire, but before you start collecting Social Security.
|
and:
Quote:
29. If you choose to file and suspend in order to enable your spouse to collect a spousal benefit on your earnings record while you delay taking your benefit in order to collect a higher one later, make sure you pay your Medicare Part B premiums out of your own pocket (i.e., you need to send Social Security a check each month). If you don’t, Social Security will pay it for you and treat you as waving (i.e., not suspending) your benefit apart from the premium and, get this, you won’t get the Delayed Retirement Credit applied to your benefit.
|
and:
Quote:
33. The thresholds beyond which first 50 percent and then 85 percent of your Social Security benefits are subject to federal income taxation are explicitly NOT indexed for inflation. Hence, eventually all Social Security recipients will be tax on 85 percent of their Social Security benefits.
|
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 04:07 PM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA suburbs
Posts: 1,796
|
Thanks for posting, bizlady! This is very timely for me. I plan to retire this July when I turn 60. I have been turning over in my head the need to possibly schedule an in-person interview at SS sometime soon to discuss SS survivor benefits. I had been thinking of just taking them at age 60 and letting my own benefits grow until age 70. I will get a COLA'ed pension and also have non-qualified investments that throw off considerable interest and dividends. I am not sure how that will impact any benefits. Maybe I will fork out the $40 bucks for the SS calculator.
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 04:18 PM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,173
|
This is quite a list and thankfully, at least 50% does not apply to me. Understanding it all takes some time. I wish he had chosen to include some examples with numbers. I find numbers make things easier to understand.
Numbers ain't hard. :-)
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy
The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 04:21 PM
|
#8
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Colorado Mountains
Posts: 3,165
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoDaresWins
Thanks for posting, bizlady! This is very timely for me. I plan to retire this July when I turn 60. I have been turning over in my head the need to possibly schedule an in-person interview at SS sometime soon to discuss SS survivor benefits. I had been thinking of just taking them at age 60 and letting my own benefits grow until age 70. I will get a COLA'ed pension and also have non-qualified investments that throw off considerable interest and dividends. I am not sure how that will impact any benefits. Maybe I will fork out the $40 bucks for the SS calculator.
|
I will receive benefits on my wife's account until I file for my own at 70. If I had known about that site and spent the $40 I would have done a little better. This whole thing is different for each individual.
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 04:22 PM
|
#9
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
|
23. Based on the Government Pension Offset provision, if you receive a pension from a federal, state or local government based on work where you did not pay Social Security taxes, your Social Security spouse’s or widow’s or widower’s benefits may be reduced. But the Government Pension Offset doesn’t kick in until you start collecting your non-covered pension. So, … it may behove you to wait to take your non-covered pension especially if the pension you can collect at a later date is actuarially increased.
Question: I have a non social security pension and am currently drawing it. If I married a lady who has full SS coming to her, does this mean she will draw less SS from her own SS because of the GPO?
Question number 2. My GF was previously married for over 10 years. Can she draw spousal benefits at full retirement age and then draw on her own larger one at 70 with no reduction in her own personal SS? It seemed like in one of the "secrets" in the article that a person could do that.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 04:31 PM
|
#10
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA suburbs
Posts: 1,796
|
I will retire from a state government entity but I have paid into SS with every job I ever had...corporate, county govt., federal govt., state university system and this last job. The same is true for my LH. I don't know the amount I would get with survivor benefits but they have to be better than mine given my very moderate final salary and also the fact that I did not work outside the home for 12 years after my son was born. It might even be that his would still be higher than mine when I turn 70. I guess I should bite the bullet, assemble my supporting documents, and schedule an in person appointment.
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 04:46 PM
|
#11
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Colorado Mountains
Posts: 3,165
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoDaresWins
I will retire from a state government entity but I have paid into SS with every job I ever had...corporate, county govt., federal govt., state university system and this last job. The same is true for my LH. I don't know the amount I would get with survivor benefits but they have to be better than mine given my very moderate final salary and also the fact that I did not work outside the home for 12 years after my son was born. It might even be that his would still be higher than mine when I turn 70. I guess I should bite the bullet, assemble my supporting documents, and schedule an in person appointment.
|
From the article, you might want to spend the $40 and get a reading from the web site. It would be nice if someone that has used the web site could chime in. I don't know anything about it except for the article and that was rather self serving, but I don't think I got all the answers from SS either.
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 06:18 PM
|
#12
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,679
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulligan
23.
Question: I have a non social security pension and am currently drawing it. If I married a lady who has full SS coming to her, does this mean she will draw less SS from her own SS because of the GPO?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|
My understanding of GPO is that it only affects you, the pension recipient. So the answer to your first question is, No, her SS will not be less if you marry her.
If you marry her YOUR spousal benefit based on her SS will be smaller. The reduction is based on 2/3 of your pension....I think.
__________________
Married, both 69. DH retired June, 2010. I have a pleasant little part time job.
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 06:38 PM
|
#13
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 731
|
This....
Bottom line - the site was peddling a product that 'within seconds' could be worth the coin to just give an answer.
Too good to be true
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 06:48 PM
|
#14
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBQ-Nut
Bottom line - the site was peddling a product that 'within seconds' could be worth the coin to just give an answer.
Too good to be true
|
I don't know if the product is worth it, but it seems likely. It seems like a very good situation for a well-written application: highly individual situations applied to a complex set of intertwined rules. Just like taxes: I'm happy to pay for software that hacks through it all and does the math/comparisons.
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 07:00 PM
|
#15
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 731
|
Well - I'll be watching this thread to see if any members here actually use the software and what they thought of it.
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 07:14 PM
|
#17
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,995
|
I have seen other web sites recommend the maximization software in this article, but I do not know anyone who has done it so far. It would be very interesting to see the results if some members decide to try it out. I suspect it works pretty well.
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 07:17 PM
|
#18
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 78
|
The author of this Forbes article, Larry Kotlikoff, makes a regular appearance on the web at PBS. Google "Larry PBS social security". He also answers questions by people on their specific circumstances.
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 08:27 PM
|
#19
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,528
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulligan
23. Based on the Government Pension Offset provision, if you receive a pension from a federal, state or local government based on work where you did not pay Social Security taxes, your Social Security spouse’s or widow’s or widower’s benefits may be reduced. But the Government Pension Offset doesn’t kick in until you start collecting your non-covered pension. So, … it may behove you to wait to take your non-covered pension especially if the pension you can collect at a later date is actuarially increased.
Question: I have a non social security pension and am currently drawing it. If I married a lady who has full SS coming to her, does this mean she will draw less SS from her own SS because of the GPO?
Question number 2. My GF was previously married for over 10 years. Can she draw spousal benefits at full retirement age and then draw on her own larger one at 70 with no reduction in her own personal SS? It seemed like in one of the "secrets" in the article that a person could do that.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|
Question #1 is no. Question #2 is yes if her ex-spouse is retirement age and he is either receiving social security or they have been divorced for 2 years.
|
|
|
03-13-2014, 09:52 PM
|
#20
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 390
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreamer
Question #1 is no. Question #2 is yes if her ex-spouse is retirement age and he is either receiving social security or they have been divorced for 2 years.
|
Question #2 scenario has been clear as mud for me too.
I meet the 10 years / more than 2 years divorced etc., and I'm the high earner in this case.
From reading - for a married couple the high earner can not claim spousal benefits at full retirement age and then draw on their own at 70.
Is this one of those Social Security quirks where as a divorcee one gets a break and the high earner is able to claim spousal benefits at full retirement age and then draw on their own at 70?
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|