Before you send it to LTC folks: would he write a separate report addressing the ADLs if you sent him a copy of your Dad's policy? "Unable to manage property & business affairs" doesn't address what they are looking for.
The claims processor's last offer (on 15 July) was to ask her boss for permission to do an onsite assessment of my Dad... a more detailed one than the care facility's MDS/MMSE. I've heard nothing from the claims processor since she said she'd take this step.
If our version of Hancock's onsite assessment doesn't meet their standards, then for a fee I'm pretty sure the ($250/hour) psychologist and the ($275/hour) lawyer would be happy to help.
I'm hoping that my ($0/hour) time on the phone with the claims processor will be a triumph of logic & persistence over bureaucracy. Otherwise they're gonna spend far more than the claim's $318K value in its defense.
I'm beginning to think that John Hancock may be holding all the money, but they certainly seem to be in the minority for common sense. Maybe they're using the wrong definitions for ADLs. By their criteria a household pet would not qualify for long-term care because the pet is capable of eating & toileting and requires no assistance with those ADLs. However left to its own devices and without the assistance that provides the food & toilet facilities, we wouldn't think that the pet had a very good life.
Hancock has other "bureaucracy" issues that make BofA look like Berkshire Hathaway. For example, the doctor's office e-mailed me the report as a PDF. They did so after I'd signed a HIPAA permission form and then they didn't worry about Dad's patient info going through an unencrypted e-mail system.
Not so for John Hancock, who only operates by fax.
I've never owned a fax machine and I don't think I ever will. I can't remember the last time I had to dial out on my fax modem, but it's been at least two years because that's when my desktop "upgrade" from WinXP to Vista removed my fax capability. Last year I did an entire PenFed mortgage refi, with nearly two dozen attachments adding up to over 100 pages, via e-mail & scanned PDFs. My SSN was splashed all over unsecure e-mail. But then PenFed's just concerned about ID theft, not patient privacy.
John Hancock does not do e-mail because of HIPAA concerns. I don't even have any e-mail addresses for their people because they don't hand them out and they've only corresponded by phone/snail mail. But Dad's psychologist report has to go to Hancock and I figured a fax would be faster than snail-mail. (I was wrong.) So a couple days ago I upgraded my eFax account to transmit as well as receive ($16.95/month), figuring that a month's fees for one fax would be cheaper than going the "buy a fax or have OfficeMax send it" route. I have yet to try to "downgrade" my eFax service when I'm done with faxing-- I don't even know if it can be done.
Let's say that you want to send a document to someone at Hancock. A few decades ago you would've sent it by snail mail. In the 1980s if you were in a real hurry then you might've upgraded to FedEx (if you had that person's actual address and not just the corporate mail room). Up through the 1990s a fax was your best bet.
I sent a fax to Hancock on Thursday night. The processor called Friday to say that she wouldn't see it for a week and to give me her "personal" fax number so that I could send it again.
Here's what happens when you "fax" someone at Hancock:
1. You print out the PDF.
2. You annotate each page of the PDF with the loved one's full name, policy number, claim number, SSN, and DOB.
3. You re-scan the PDF (with your annotated data).
4. You log in to your eFax account, fill out their HTML form for a cover sheet, and upload your PDF.
5. An hour later eFax tells you the number's still busy. You re-send at 8:30 PM HST (2:30 AM in Boston) and finally get it through.
6. eFax converts your HTML & PDF to the equivalent fax tones and sends them to what must be Hancock's sole fax machine.
7. A minimum-wage employee takes each sheet out of the fax machine and... scans them into a PDF. For all I know, Hancock's fax machine is actually in Bangalore or Hanoi.
8. The PDF is (hopefully) filed under the right claim number and is uploaded to Hancock's "secure" computer network for the staff's use. Apparently this takes about a week. I coulda used a snail-mail stamp for that result.
Or... you get that employee's personal fax number and repeat steps 1-6.
Hancock does not allow employees to permit us to sign a HIPAA waiver.
Hopefully this claims processor will call back Monday with an update. If they're not inclined to approve the claim then I think I'll pay the lawyer to handle the appeals process. I'm pretty sure the lawyer has a fax machine. At $275/hour I bet it's a nice one.
Nords, I am so sorry. It's got to hurt to see this in black and white. Getting the test done was a necessary step, and it looks like it has been completed successfully, but it has to be so hard on you. When everything is done, maybe you can take it easy on yourself for a while and give yourself some time to handle the impact of seeing a statement like this.
I think the worst part for Dad right now is knowing that he can't remember. Cruel irony that it's one of the few things he can remember. Maybe in a few months that won't be a problem any more.
The "good" news is that he appears to have total faith in us sons (even though he doesn't recognize me) to handle his affairs.
I should point out that my sympathy lies with this memory loss happening to anyone ("Flowers for Algernon"), but not so much with my father in particular. I'm probably carrying enough baggage for an entire squad of skycaps, but my father spent the last 25 years turning himself into a hermit at the expense of ties to family (particularly his only grandchild), friends, and acquaintances. "Giving up" his independence by keeping an updated POA file would have cost him a few notary fees. Doing it this way is over $6000 so far and no end in sight.
My spouse is joint, JTWROS, and/or POD on everything we own or control. Accounts, web addresses, logins, and passwords are all on hand in a passworded file. If I woke up incapacitated tomorrow she'd be able to open that file folder (it's her password) and carry on within an hour. My brother's my only other living relative, and if he someday ends up living alone and wants this sort of backup then he knows the rules.