I want to gift money each year to my 30 year old son and daughter. Both are single. Both have good incomes. One is financially smart and responsible, the other- not so much. Both were taught well, one just valued the knowledge and applies it better.
One contributes fully to their Roth IRA as well as to their brokerage account and allows me to manage the account. The other tells me nothing. Not because I’m at all judgmental (only encouraging) but because they are likely embarrassed.
Anyway, to encourage savings I was trying to come up with a way to give them choices as far as my gifting was concerned. My thought was to offer them 100% match on any Roth IRA contributions they make. So they put in $3000, I match it with $3000. The other option is to choose a straight out $1500 gift, no requirements.
So they would be given the choice of doing nothing and with no oversight getting $1500, or saving $3000 and getting $3000 with some oversight. I suspect one would choose the higher value option and I have no idea what the other would choose. But if it was their choice and their sibling got more by doing more they couldn’t claim preferential treatment or favoritism. Does this sound like a reasonable thing to offer?
One contributes fully to their Roth IRA as well as to their brokerage account and allows me to manage the account. The other tells me nothing. Not because I’m at all judgmental (only encouraging) but because they are likely embarrassed.
Anyway, to encourage savings I was trying to come up with a way to give them choices as far as my gifting was concerned. My thought was to offer them 100% match on any Roth IRA contributions they make. So they put in $3000, I match it with $3000. The other option is to choose a straight out $1500 gift, no requirements.
So they would be given the choice of doing nothing and with no oversight getting $1500, or saving $3000 and getting $3000 with some oversight. I suspect one would choose the higher value option and I have no idea what the other would choose. But if it was their choice and their sibling got more by doing more they couldn’t claim preferential treatment or favoritism. Does this sound like a reasonable thing to offer?