|
|
Good Auto Bailout Article - NYT:
11-18-2008, 11:01 AM
|
#1
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,483
|
Good Auto Bailout Article - NYT:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/bu...1&ref=business
I agree almost 100% with this idea. It wouldn't make Toyota, Honda or Nissan happy, but it's the only way to proceed............
__________________
Consult with your own advisor or representative. My thoughts should not be construed as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results (love that one).......:)
This Thread is USELESS without pics.........:)
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
11-18-2008, 11:10 AM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
|
That actually was pretty good, and I think it was a rather solid and even-handed assessment -- retool the product line, make the UAW enter the world of 21st Century compensation AND kick the incompetent management out. Maybe with a "government-engineered bankruptcy," they'd lose their golden parachutes, too.
The problems with Detroit are not only with management, not only with the union, and not only with the bloated product line that no one seems to want. All of these feed off of each other, and all of them need to be flatlined and rebuilt.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 03:41 PM
|
#3
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 222
|
What's this? FD linking to (and agreeing with!) an article from the "Treason Times"?
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 03:43 PM
|
#4
|
gone traveling
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,864
|
The Times, they are a 'changing...
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 04:23 PM
|
#5
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 491
|
Wow. If we are to bail out the industry, this is a very reasonable starting point for the plan. Best idea I have seen so far.
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 04:40 PM
|
#6
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
|
From the NYT article:
"But there is a fix. Call it a government-sponsored bankruptcy, a G.S.B., if you will. It might sound a bit like an oxymoron, but it is an idea that has been quietly making the rounds in Washington."
Good proposal. How likely is it that it moves from "quietly making the rounds in Washington" to "the consensus GM bail-out plan with strong bi-partisan support"? We can only hope...
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 04:45 PM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 7,968
|
Like that ancient Artie Johnson line: 'very interesting.'
heh heh heh - I guess we'll see when we see.
I suppose when the time comes my GMC is gonna be a used one!
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 04:48 PM
|
#8
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,381
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo
How likely is it that it moves from "quietly making the rounds in Washington" to "the consensus GM bail-out plan with strong bi-partisan support"? We can only hope...
|
Ordinarily I'd say "fat chance". But, the calendar isn't exactly cooperating with GM and Union management. Their guys don't officially run the show until Jan 20 and it looks like they won't make it that long. And right now it seems like the Republicans have a pretty solid "No" vote that will keep anything from happening until the new White House and Congress own the whole thing. Could be the makings of a compromise that actually has a chance at fixing the Auto industry.
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 04:52 PM
|
#9
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,483
|
Hey even a blind squirrel finds a nut sometime, I guess the NYT got "lucky". You guys all think I am a whacked out Bible thumping righty, but I enjoy the occasional laspe in the media where they actually make sense............
__________________
Consult with your own advisor or representative. My thoughts should not be construed as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results (love that one).......:)
This Thread is USELESS without pics.........:)
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 04:56 PM
|
#10
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ENE MO - near STL
Posts: 424
|
Agreed. It addresses the two main problems with bankruptcy that I see. The financing, which it obviously extremely problematic right now. And the warranty confidence issue.
So do you think that the congress is holding their feet to the fire, making them sweat, giving the CEOs a public beating, and in the background working on some kind of arrangement such as this? There's a big game of poker being played. I hope they work out a deal such as this. I don't think the market would like the further uncertainty that would result if they don't.
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 05:00 PM
|
#11
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,204
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinanceDude
|
Agreed, that's probably the most sensible article I've read on the subject. It's an aside, but while I blame (in no particular order) the UAW ($70/hr is not sustainable), the Management (if they couldn't see this coming...) and the awful car designs (sorry, but they're still nowhere near Toyota or Honda) - the buying public deserves some of the blame too. Everyone now says the big 3 need to make (hyper) efficient cars as a condition of any bailout or loan. But they've all offered Cobalts, Focus, Neon's etc. for years and the buying public walked right by them and bought Explorers, Escalades, Suburbans, etc. I agree the small cars from the big 3 aren't comparable to Toyota or Honda, but I can sympathize somewhat in that the big 3 can't be expected to produce Hummers one day and hypermileage small cars a few months later.
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57
Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 05:08 PM
|
#12
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,381
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack
Everyone now says the big 3 need to make (hyper) efficient cars as a condition of any bailout or loan.
|
I'd replace the word "everyone" in that sentence with "politicians". The idea that the auto industry should make high MPG cars has absolutely nothing to do with the companies' near-term solvency or long-term viability. It has everything to do, though, with Washington trying to use private companies as a tool to implement public policy.
No one whose first priority is a viable, privately owned, auto industry gives a rats arse about whether they make efficient cars or not. What they care about is whether the industry can profitably make cars people actually want to buy . . . high MPG or otherwise. Right now the answer is "no". If the government gives them money with the only condition that they increase fleet MPGs, the answer will continue to be "no".
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 05:16 PM
|
#13
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack
. . . the buying public deserves some of the blame too.
|
I would add another set of car buyers who are to blame--those who buy/bought "American" cars (big and small) for "patriotic" reasons, despite the fact that the cars were crappy. Detroit might have started building good cars 25 years ago, and not be in the fix they are in, if these folks hadn't been subsidizing incompetence and sloth. Toyota makes high-quality trucks and small cars--and they build them in the US, and they make money on all of them.
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 07:07 PM
|
#14
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ENE MO - near STL
Posts: 424
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem
I would add another set of car buyers who are to blame--those who buy/bought "American" cars (big and small) for "patriotic" reasons, despite the fact that the cars were crappy. Detroit might have started building good cars 25 years ago, and not be in the fix they are in, if these folks hadn't been subsidizing incompetence and sloth. Toyota makes high-quality trucks and small cars--and they build them in the US, and they make money on all of them.
|
Interesting point. It's yet another example of the unintended consequences of making decisions based on emotions and good intentions vs. rational economic based decisions.
People still don't understand the power of the global economy and think that they can hold those huge forces with walls or the power of their will. It's like blaming people for seeking out the best prices for other goods.
As if we can just say "buy U.S." and it will solve all our problems and transport us back to those halcyon days of the 50s and 60s when we were the only game in town. Making those choices is a luxury that those with high discretionary income can make, but those scraping by cannot afford to make patriotic statements with their spending when they're trying to feed and clothe the family and save something for their future. Sorry for the drift.
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 08:31 PM
|
#15
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by . . . Yrs to Go
I'd replace the word "everyone" in that sentence with "politicians". The idea that the auto industry should make high MPG cars has absolutely nothing to do with the companies' near-term solvency or long-term viability. It has everything to do, though, with Washington trying to use private companies as a tool to implement public policy.
No one whose first priority is a viable, privately owned, auto industry gives a rats arse about whether they make efficient cars or not. What they care about is whether the industry can profitably make cars people actually want to buy . . . high MPG or otherwise. Right now the answer is "no". If the government gives them money with the only condition that they increase fleet MPGs, the answer will continue to be "no".
|
Right. These "dual goal" public-private partnerships are bound to fail.
The goal of any bail-out is for the company to be profitable enough to repay the loan. This doesn't happen if the gov't forces the company to make cars that people don't want to buy.
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 08:33 PM
|
#16
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 5,267
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem
I would add another set of car buyers who are to blame--those who buy/bought "American" cars (big and small) for "patriotic" reasons, despite the fact that the cars were crappy. Detroit might have started building good cars 25 years ago, and not be in the fix they are in, if these folks hadn't been subsidizing incompetence and sloth. Toyota makes high-quality trucks and small cars--and they build them in the US, and they make money on all of them.
|
As always, spot on. I think the Big 3 misjudged by trying to essentially hold us hostage for a bail out. "If you don't do it, we are going to take this country down! Millions of lost jobs! Don't make me use this thing!"
Had they come to congress and said, "We have a plan to get right and get in the black by x date, look at this exciting work we are doing..." etc. they'd have had a chance. A month or so ago I read they cut their costs by slashing their R&D budget. Considering their best selling models have been re-hashes of the past I wonder how much that actually saved them.
|
|
|
11-18-2008, 08:38 PM
|
#17
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinanceDude
|
I think this is the core compromise. Instead of avoiding bankruptcy, the gov't makes Chapter 11 feasible. They also require a pre-negotiated outline before they go to court.
The basics are:
the stockholders get wiped out,
the bondholders trade all their debt for equity,
the active workers take 90% of what Toyota pays (maybe add long-term profit sharing),
the retirees keep health insurance but pay higher premiums and higher deductibles,
top management goes.
Forget the part where the gov't micro-manages how many brands they keep and what level of gas mileage their cars should get.
|
|
|
11-19-2008, 12:26 AM
|
#18
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,171
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Independent
Right. These "dual goal" public-private partnerships are bound to fail.
The goal of any bail-out is for the company to be profitable enough to repay the loan. This doesn't happen if the gov't forces the company to make cars that people don't want to buy.
|
But why assume that people don't want to buy high mileage cars? Toyota is selling Priuses faster than they can make them, and I would imagine making a lot of money on them too. Or possibly you think that they have cornered that market and there is not enough demand to allow another profitable high-mileage car?
|
|
|
11-19-2008, 02:31 AM
|
#19
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,115
|
no mention of what happens to the gm vendors that are owed 28 billion in this bankruptsey...... what kind of ribble effect would that have
|
|
|
11-19-2008, 08:02 AM
|
#20
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyounge1956
But why assume that people don't want to buy high mileage cars? Toyota is selling Priuses faster than they can make them, and I would imagine making a lot of money on them too. Or possibly you think that they have cornered that market and there is not enough demand to allow another profitable high-mileage car?
|
I wonder what kind of hybrid the American buyer wants, a Prius or a hybrid Tahoe........
Once again, GM misses the boat, the folks buying their Tahoes don't care about gas mileage...........
__________________
Consult with your own advisor or representative. My thoughts should not be construed as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results (love that one).......:)
This Thread is USELESS without pics.........:)
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|