BigNick
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
If the savings take a big hit and the WR gets up to >3% then yes, we'll cut back.
I'd be interested to know if anyone is cutting back even though Firecalc said that their proposed WR would have survived 100% of previous historical sequences - which would include, for example, retiring in late 1928.
To cut back in those circumstances would suggest (if analysed rationally, which is presumably what we are trying to do by using Firecalc or similar tools!) that people are looking to be even more secure than "worst possible case".
Here's the take which I've decided on (while editing my signature to remove 50K from the portfolio, but uprating the w*rk pension pot since DW and I have another year's worth of contributions in it): if the Dow drops to 9K, then compared with a month ago, we will be about 120K down. But firstly, the stocks part of the portfolio probably isn't going to be needed for drawdown any time soon, and secondly, one of the uses of the portfolio could be to buy a home for retirement - we're currently paying 1500/month in rent, which is the equivalent of 450K immobilised at a 4% WR. And since the home we buy may well be in an area where prices are falling as a result of the downturn, we might very well get that for 330K. All hot air, of course, but it helps me sleep better.
(Of course, I could give myself a further morale boost by evaluating my signature in US$ rather then Euros... but I reckon that a Euro in France buys about the same as a $ in the US, so this reflects my situation better for US readers. In case anyone's interested. )