Maybe an ARM is historically a cheaper choice, but over the last 5 years they seemed pretty risky to me. I remember the rate difference between a 5/1 ARM and a 30-year fixed was pretty low when I bought my house in 2005. It's pretty tiny right now.
I just don't think the tiny interest savings are worth the risk of a spike in rates.
One of the big advantages of a 30-year fixed mortgage is that it turns your biggest expense into a giant inflation hedge. If rates actually plummet, you can refinance. I think its crazy to give that up for less than .5%
It just seems funny that Greenspan was encouraging everyone to get more creative with their home financing at the very time they should have been getting less creative.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewer12345
Actually, he is correct. ARMs and hybrid ARMs (5/1, etc.) generally provide lower all-in costs vs. 30 year fixed loans. What happened is that people went nuts with their mortgages. For those with a smidge of discipline and common sense (a depressingly small portion of the Merkin population), ARMS are in fact a better choice.
|