RetiredHappy
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2021
- Messages
- 1,589
If I have the ability to choose, I will not choose an extended poor quality of life. I can't speak for DW but her basic philosophy is the same.
That has always been my outlook that quality > quantity.
That ability to choose is the question, but DW would respect my decision, even if I could not take all the necessary steps.
Sounds morbid? Nothing so bad as laying about warehoused in a facility so I can watch a rerun on the tube every day. It for sure is not about the money.
It is not about all or nothing and being able to choose euthanasia or not. Decline is usually a slow progression. As we get older, we start to get mobility issues. We may fall and that renders it difficult to get around. We may find it difficult to stand in the kitchen to prepare meals. LTCI is about needing assistance with 2 ADLs, Acitivities of Daily Living
- Ambulation - Walking
- Bathing and showering
- Dressing and grooming
- Toileting
- Mobility - Transferring
- Self-feeding - arthritic hands need someone to cut up food to eat
So it is not that the moment you need help with 2 ADLs, you decide to say goodbye to the world.
We also worked in the LTC industry and know intimately the details and hence we chose to buy LTCI. We could self-insure but people who self-insure are less likely to want to pay for care when they need it. Putting the burden on spouse and family for help is going to add stress to others and 65% of family caregivers die before the people that they are looking after. That is a statistics that is taught on first day in gerontology. With LTCI, the mindset is that since the insured had paid up, why not have the insurer pay for care now that they need it.
Last edited: