Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
How Pensions and Change Your Asset Allocation
Old 01-14-2015, 01:25 PM   #1
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 28
How Pensions and Change Your Asset Allocation

I have about 300k that in a DB Plan that will come available in 4 years. At that time I will either take the montly anunity or a lump sum. How should I treat this when designing my AA? My past advisor had it listed as bonds. The DB plan is very well funded and I have no doubts it is safe and sound going forward. I am currently collection another small DB Pension and have a strong SS record that will kick in 6 years from now. My current thought is to keep the 300k listed as Bonds and invest the remainder of my portfolio 800k in low cost ETF Index Funds from Vanguard. Your thoughts?
macav933 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 01-14-2015, 01:29 PM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
2B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,337
This has been beaten around before. My opinion which others will disagree with is that the DB payments simply reduce the amount of money you need from your portfolio. I wouldn't readjust my AA by calling this cash flow a bond. You can't "sell" your pension like you would a bond so it's effectively illiquid. If I had a significant amount of pension income, I might be tempted to be more aggressive with my equities.
__________________
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane -- Marcus Aurelius
2B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 01:48 PM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Colorado Mountains
Posts: 3,165
I found it interesting that if I include the annuity value of my non-cola pension in my SWR calculations, the fixed amount I withdraw is close to 4%. If I ignore it and just treat it as a reduced amount of money needed from the portfolio, my withdrawal is closer to 2%. If I don't include the pension as part of the portfolio, I am ignoring inflation associated with the pension and its impact on SWR.
Hermit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 01:56 PM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Chuckanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,171
I will agree with 2B.

The Pension is a phantom asset that is hard to evaluate since one can never trade it in for a pile of cash, and it disappears at death leaving nothing for the heirs (other than survivor benefits if that is chosen).

And, phantoms can be spooky so one should never bet the farm on such a creature.
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy

The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
Chuckanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 03:26 PM   #5
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 28
It's a phantom asset for now....in 4 years I can take control of the lump and roll it over. At that time I will see what is the better deal...lump or anunity.
macav933 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 03:59 PM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
The first question is "Why do you care about your asset allocation?"

One possible reason for people who post here is that they are looking at SWR studies and they are targeting some "best" allocation that allows the pattern of withdrawals and safety they want. In this case, the AA is input into some historical or Monte Carlo analysis. For this purpose, it seems that the pension is not included in your AA because it doesn't fit as input for those number crunchers.

It would be included in your view of what you're going to do with your investment withdrawals - a higher pension may mean that your withdrawals are mostly for luxuries, rather than necessities. This might make you more willing to accept a more volatile withdrawal pattern or investment return. But, that consideration doesn't lend itself to something as mechanical as an asset allocation.
Independent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 04:16 PM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 38,007
How much do you need each year from the invested funds apart from your pension, and how much volatility can you live with? That's what determines your AA. And it's independent of your pension. Your pension will cover X amount of your living expenses. You may need to tap into your investments for the rest, and that is what drives the design.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 04:28 PM   #8
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
clifp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2B View Post
This has been beaten around before. My opinion which others will disagree with is that the DB payments simply reduce the amount of money you need from your portfolio. I wouldn't readjust my AA by calling this cash flow a bond. You can't "sell" your pension like you would a bond so it's effectively illiquid. If I had a significant amount of pension income, I might be tempted to be more aggressive with my equities.
Other might disagree, but they would be wrong. If it's a COLA pension you can treat exactly like social security.

A suppose for modeling purposes it isn't bad to treat it as bond allocation, but only if you actually think you'll take it as lump sum. 'But once you decide to take an annuity it reduces your cost of living just as 2B says and is no longer a bond.
clifp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 04:56 PM   #9
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Colorado Mountains
Posts: 3,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by audreyh1 View Post
How much do you need each year from the invested funds apart from your pension, and how much volatility can you love with? That's what determines your AA. And it's independent of your pension. Your pension will cover X amount of your living expenses. You may need to tap into your investments for the rest, and that is what drives the design.
I'm having a hard time getting my arms around the volatile lover
Hermit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 05:34 PM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 38,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermit View Post
I'm having a hard time getting my arms around the volatile lover
Yeah ,e too I'm having ng a terrible time with my iPad typing and weird "corrections".
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 05:44 PM   #11
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
nun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,872
DB pensions and SS are just like a paycheck and if they cover your expenses I think you can be as aggressive as someone starting out to save for retirement. So rather than going with Jack Bogle's "age as the percentage of bonds in your AA" you might go with "age as the percentage of equities in your AA". Personally, I have my income needs covered by DB and rental income so I'm going with an 80/20 AA.
__________________
“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”

Current AA: 75% Equity Funds / 15% Bonds / 5% Stable Value /2% Cash / 3% TIAA Traditional
Retired Mar 2014 at age 52, target WR: 0.0%,
Income from pension and rent
nun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2015, 05:49 PM   #12
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2B View Post
This has been beaten around before. My opinion which others will disagree with is that the DB payments simply reduce the amount of money you need from your portfolio. I wouldn't readjust my AA by calling this cash flow a bond. You can't "sell" your pension like you would a bond so it's effectively illiquid. If I had a significant amount of pension income, I might be tempted to be more aggressive with my equities.
I can't believe it, but I totally agree with 2B.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Your Target Asset Allocation easysurfer FIRE and Money 36 09-24-2009 01:15 AM
If You Could Change One Thing About Your Personality, What Would You Change? haha Other topics 57 09-17-2009 01:10 PM
Calculating your asset allocation modhatter FIRE and Money 8 08-09-2009 05:09 PM
For those which FIREd- how often did you change your asset allocation? jIMOh FIRE and Money 7 01-09-2008 11:51 AM
How's your Asset Allocation holding up? mickeyd FIRE and Money 31 03-05-2007 07:18 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:36 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.