Ready
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
What's required and what is prudent are often two different things.
Frankly, I'm amazed that after being upset with the $5,000 replacement limit situation with this company, that you are willing to try to play this so close to the line, with so much more at stake.
I understand that much of this is driven by emotion (sentimental attachment to the ring), and that may lead to some seemingly irrational approaches. But that doesn't mean that everything about the situation needs to be treated irrationally.
I'll just say it, it just isn't rational to keep an expensive item in an assisted living center where things have already been "lost", and "hope" the insurance company covers it.
Maybe you need to step back, take a break, and reassess the situation? I really think you have become blind to some things that a number of us have pointed out.
-ERD50
I agree that is is not rational to keep a $75K ring at an assisted living facility. But I can not tell MIL what to do. She is there because of a heart condition, but her mind is sound.
MIL lives in Florida and we live in California. I have no way of making a duplicate copy of a $75K ring from 2,000 miles away. I have told her to put the ring in a bank vault. She does not want to. I can not make her do something she simply does not want to do.
As much as I would like to take control of the situation, this is not something I have the ability to control. I will continue to encourage her to move the ring to a safer location. Maybe after we resolve the watch issue with the insurance company she will reconsider.