Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
John Bogle on bonds
Old 06-06-2010, 05:26 PM   #1
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
John Bogle on bonds

We've seen a lot of concern about the performance bonds/bond funds in what some expect to be a rising interest rate environment. Here is what John Bogle, founder of Vanguard, has to say about the subject:

Bogle's not afraid of bonds: Vanguard founder says to keep investing simple
__________________
Numbers is hard
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 06-06-2010, 06:12 PM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,525
It's very interesting that Bogle considers SS as a part of the bond allocation. I'm not clear on how to bring the SS dollars into the allocation equation though.
ejman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2010, 06:45 PM   #3
Moderator Emeritus
Rich_by_the_Bay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 8,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejman View Post
It's very interesting that Bogle considers SS as a part of the bond allocation. I'm not clear on how to bring the SS dollars into the allocation equation though.
I interpreted his comments as meaning do a present value calculation on your SS benefits, and consider that amount as part of your bond allocation when applying the "age in bonds" allocation.

So, a 65 year old with $1mm would normally have $650k in bonds; if his SS benefits corresponded to a present value of $200k, he would allocate $450k to bonds (which would correspond to $650k in bonds when the present value of SS is included). Most spreadsheets have a "PV" function.
__________________
Rich
San Francisco Area
ESR'd March 2010. FIRE'd January 2011.

As if you didn't know..If the above message contains medical content, it's NOT intended as advice, and may not be accurate, applicable or sufficient. Don't rely on it for any purpose. Consult your own doctor for all medical advice.
Rich_by_the_Bay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2010, 06:55 PM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
What Rich said.

There are some past threads discussing this subject and I recall no consensus on either the wisdom of following Bogles suggested allocation or on how to arrive at the PV of SS benefits. Big surprise, eh?
__________________
Numbers is hard
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2010, 08:06 PM   #5
Moderator Emeritus
Rich_by_the_Bay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 8,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
I recall no consensus on either the wisdom of following Bogles suggested allocation or on how to arrive at the PV of SS benefits. Big surprise, eh?
That's true, though Bogle is a hard guy to argue with. I'm sticking with 40-45% equities probably long term, but if I were rich, ailing and in my 80s, that 20% equity position might make sense for me, too.

Did you reduce your bond allocation when you started SS?

Once more time, everyone's situation is different.
__________________
Rich
San Francisco Area
ESR'd March 2010. FIRE'd January 2011.

As if you didn't know..If the above message contains medical content, it's NOT intended as advice, and may not be accurate, applicable or sufficient. Don't rely on it for any purpose. Consult your own doctor for all medical advice.
Rich_by_the_Bay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2010, 08:32 PM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich_in_Tampa View Post
Did you reduce your bond allocation when you started SS?
No, I didn't factor SS into my asset allocation. I've stuck with an equity percentage similar to yours, although the current market slide has made me think Bogle's "100 minus your age" bond equity allocation may have some merit...
__________________
Numbers is hard
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2010, 08:48 PM   #7
Moderator Emeritus
Rich_by_the_Bay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 8,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo View Post
No, I didn't factor SS into my asset allocation. I've stuck with an equity percentage similar to yours, although the current market slide has made me think Bogle's "100 minus your age" bond allocation may have some merit...
Did you mean Bogle's "your current age in bonds" (or 100 minus your age in stocks")?
__________________
Rich
San Francisco Area
ESR'd March 2010. FIRE'd January 2011.

As if you didn't know..If the above message contains medical content, it's NOT intended as advice, and may not be accurate, applicable or sufficient. Don't rely on it for any purpose. Consult your own doctor for all medical advice.
Rich_by_the_Bay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2010, 08:52 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,525
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich_in_Tampa View Post
I interpreted his comments as meaning do a present value calculation on your SS benefits, and consider that amount as part of your bond allocation when applying the "age in bonds" allocation.

So, a 65 year old with $1mm would normally have $650k in bonds; if his SS benefits corresponded to a present value of $200k, he would allocate $450k to bonds (which would correspond to $650k in bonds when the present value of SS is included). Most spreadsheets have a "PV" function.
I see, so all I have to do is figure out how long I'll live and what the future inflation adjusted and law change (if any) adjusted SS payments will be and just plug them into the PV calculation... I can see why neither you or REWahoo have actually made that adjustment. Sounds like a good approach to me. I think when I start collecting SS I'll just let it be and consider it mana from heaven...
ejman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2010, 08:54 PM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich_in_Tampa View Post
Did you mean Bogle's "your current age in bonds" (or 100 minus your age in stocks")?
In stocks. Thanks for catching my goof.
__________________
Numbers is hard
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2010, 09:03 PM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,525
Actually, it just occurred to me that if I were to follow the 25X rule (or conversely stated the 4% withdrawal guideline) then say a $2,000/mo SS payment would translate into a $600K current pot indexed for inflation as part of the bond allocation no?
ejman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2010, 09:04 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
REWahoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
Si.
__________________
Numbers is hard
REWahoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2010, 09:07 PM   #12
Moderator Emeritus
Rich_by_the_Bay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 8,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejman View Post
Actually, it just occurred to me that if I were to follow the 25X rule (or conversely stated the 4% withdrawal guideline) then say a $2,000/mo SS payment would translate into a $600K current pot indexed for inflation as part of the bond allocation no?
Roughly, though SS is COLA-adjusted and the periodic amounts rise by some 8% per year if you delay taking them.

But too much thinking going on here . I think that the 4% rule estimate is fine, and throwing the PV estimate in as a rough amount to help you adjust your asset allocation.
__________________
Rich
San Francisco Area
ESR'd March 2010. FIRE'd January 2011.

As if you didn't know..If the above message contains medical content, it's NOT intended as advice, and may not be accurate, applicable or sufficient. Don't rely on it for any purpose. Consult your own doctor for all medical advice.
Rich_by_the_Bay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2010, 11:45 PM   #13
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kerrville,Tx
Posts: 3,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejman View Post
Actually, it just occurred to me that if I were to follow the 25X rule (or conversely stated the 4% withdrawal guideline) then say a $2,000/mo SS payment would translate into a $600K current pot indexed for inflation as part of the bond allocation no?
Or if you want more precision, assume SS is an immediate annuity and figure what it would cost to purchase. (Vanguard has a page that given a monthly amount can give you the needed payment). Of course its hard to find an annunity that also pays 1/2 to your spouse if they have no earnings record etc.
meierlde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2010, 09:58 AM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejman View Post
Actually, it just occurred to me that if I were to follow the 25X rule (or conversely stated the 4% withdrawal guideline) then say a $2,000/mo SS payment would translate into a $600K current pot indexed for inflation as part of the bond allocation no?

Only if you are about to start taking SS now....

I am early 50s... and I will not start to get SS for a long time... so taking my (lets say) $24k per year X 25 is not what I have... that is what I will have 'then'... I would have to discount it back to today...
Texas Proud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2010, 11:50 PM   #15
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by meierlde View Post
Of course its hard to find an annunity that also pays 1/2 to your spouse if they have no earnings record etc.
It's Social "welfare" Security.
oilspill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2010, 07:49 AM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by meierlde View Post
Of course its hard to find an annunity that also pays 1/2 to your spouse if they have no earnings record etc.
Plenty of annuities have a survivor income option.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2010, 10:09 AM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 38,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejman View Post
I see, so all I have to do is figure out how long I'll live and what the future inflation adjusted and law change (if any) adjusted SS payments will be and just plug them into the PV calculation... I can see why neither you or REWahoo have actually made that adjustment. Sounds like a good approach to me. I think when I start collecting SS I'll just let it be and consider it mana from heaven...
That's my plan. I'm still young enough to not "count" on SS. I haven't even decided what age I'll take it.

But Bogle's advice probably makes sense for someone for whom SS is a big portion of their retirement income.

Audrey
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
John Bogle interview; age 53 = smarter investors Bestwifeever FIRE and Money 10 05-24-2008 10:18 AM
Muni Bonds - Calif State University Revenue Bonds - 2008A. Disappointed FIRE and Money 0 03-24-2008 09:25 PM
John Bogle to be interviewed by Bill Moyers kevink FIRE and Money 17 10-03-2007 09:47 AM
John Bogle on Bill Moyers maxer Other topics 1 09-29-2007 11:57 AM
John Bogle On Managers Income yakers FIRE and Money 6 06-29-2007 09:18 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:05 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.