workmyfingerstothebone
Recycles dryer sheets
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2013
- Messages
- 117
Been a landlord of a SFH for 10 years, same tenant since I started.
Renters are continually late on the rent, probably 7 out of the last 12 months.
They do pay but sometimes it's at the end of the month, which then causes them to be late the next month and so on....
Overall decent tenants but they continually seem to have "hard" times which effect paying rent on time.
I've assisted by returning half their rent deposit and using their security deposit as rent payment one month, which they're paying back each month.
Also offered a half month rent for the holidays once hoping this would get them back on their feet.
Only minimal rent increases each year, which should be helping them out.
The rental is about $300/month below market which I could charge tomorrow and get.
So I've painted a nice picture of myself. But am I really....
I issued a 3 day notice to quit or pay rent on the first of the month as I'm done chasing after the rent each month.
But then again, maybe that's just part of the job.
I also issued a 60 notice to vacate the property.
Renters paid the rent so I rescinded the 3 day notice.
But still kept the 60 in effect.
I believe I've been fair but listening to the renters one would not think so.
One comment was "sure, we are late but we pay every month and don't complain about the late fee".
This comment caught me off guard.
Is their an appropriate amount of "lateness" allowed before removing tenants?
Overall I like the tenants (been their 10 years) and if not for chasing after the rent monthly I would still rent to them.
I wonder if I used overkill by issuing a 60 notice to vacate?
So, asking renters and landlords to chime in.
Am i a horrible landlord who should rescind the 60 day notice or am I gullible as hell?
Thanks for any input ..... solutions or remedies....
Renters are continually late on the rent, probably 7 out of the last 12 months.
They do pay but sometimes it's at the end of the month, which then causes them to be late the next month and so on....
Overall decent tenants but they continually seem to have "hard" times which effect paying rent on time.
I've assisted by returning half their rent deposit and using their security deposit as rent payment one month, which they're paying back each month.
Also offered a half month rent for the holidays once hoping this would get them back on their feet.
Only minimal rent increases each year, which should be helping them out.
The rental is about $300/month below market which I could charge tomorrow and get.
So I've painted a nice picture of myself. But am I really....
I issued a 3 day notice to quit or pay rent on the first of the month as I'm done chasing after the rent each month.
But then again, maybe that's just part of the job.
I also issued a 60 notice to vacate the property.
Renters paid the rent so I rescinded the 3 day notice.
But still kept the 60 in effect.
I believe I've been fair but listening to the renters one would not think so.
One comment was "sure, we are late but we pay every month and don't complain about the late fee".
This comment caught me off guard.
Is their an appropriate amount of "lateness" allowed before removing tenants?
Overall I like the tenants (been their 10 years) and if not for chasing after the rent monthly I would still rent to them.
I wonder if I used overkill by issuing a 60 notice to vacate?
So, asking renters and landlords to chime in.
Am i a horrible landlord who should rescind the 60 day notice or am I gullible as hell?
Thanks for any input ..... solutions or remedies....
Last edited: