Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-12-2019, 09:48 AM   #21
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatrickA5 View Post
.... I made the same calls to VG as you did. They never gave me a good reason other than "you need a Will to do that". Stupid.
An educated guess on my part is that since if they did offer beneficiary designations for joint accounts, the only situation where the beneficiaries would come into play is where the joint account owners died simultaneously... if one died before the other then the ownership of the joint account would go to the surviving joint account owner (who could then change beneficiaries if they wish to).

Since whether the joint owners died simultaneously or not can be subjective, by not allowing beneficiary designations for joint accounts they avoid the simultaneous death issue entirely and the possibility of paying out to the beneficiaries based on a simultaneous death that is later changed and results in a change in how the proceeds would have been distributed.

For example, say Dick and Jane die in a car accident, the deaths are judged to be simultaneous and the proceeds are distributed to 5 people equally. However, a case can be made that Jane died first and Dick's will names his son Joe as sole beneficiary. After the joint account proceeds are distributed, Joe files suit claiming that Jane died first so when Dick died he was the sole owner of the account and that Joe is entitled to the entire proceeds as Joe is Dick's sole beneficiary in Dick's will.

If Joe wins the case in court and the court decides that Jane died first and that Joe is entitled to the entire proceeds then Vanguard would have to find a way to clawback the distributions (which may have already been spent) or be on the hook for the difference.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 08-12-2019, 10:02 AM   #22
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
OldShooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: City
Posts: 10,337
Quote:
Originally Posted by 24601NoMore View Post
... you guys are going to have a very hard time convincing me that an attorney is going to have some magic pixie dust that is going to materially impact the net result of a will. ...
Well, I'll try one more time and then give up.

I, too, have reviewed and helped draft many contracts over the years. As you point out, most of that is a mechanical task that assistants can do.

Pixie dust? I don't know. But a good trusts and estates lawyer will have been through a lot of pathological situations that we amateur drafters know nothing about. For example, the trust beneficiary and his/her spouse die in a common disaster, leaving minor children whose guardian you do not know. What is the trustee to do? You can easily imagine other death and divorce scenarios. You become incompetent, then a benficiary dies. Childless and unmarried beneficiary dies intestate, leaving a bunch of money in estate proceeds or in a trust. What happens to it? What if a beneficiary of your estate in a community property state has a spendthrift spouse or a spouse that divorces him/her? What if a trust is set up to dole out specific dollar amounts on specific dates or birthdays (age 25,25, 45 for example) and the beneficiary is diagnosed with a fatal disease? Can the trust corpus be used for 24 hour care to make the last days more comfortable or is it locked up by the trust language?

Edit: I just read @pb4's good post. In our estate plan, it explicitly says that in a common disaster it will be assumed that I predeceased DW. This lets the plan run cleanly, my part first then hers. No mixing up. Do your home-made documents include language like this? Maybe. Maybe not.
OldShooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 11:22 AM   #23
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
An educated guess on my part is that since if they did offer beneficiary designations for joint accounts, the only situation where the beneficiaries would come into play is where the joint account owners died simultaneously... if one died before the other then the ownership of the joint account would go to the surviving joint account owner (who could then change beneficiaries if they wish to).

Since whether the joint owners died simultaneously or not can be subjective, by not allowing beneficiary designations for joint accounts they avoid the simultaneous death issue entirely and the possibility of paying out to the beneficiaries based on a simultaneous death that is later changed and results in a change in how the proceeds would have been distributed.

For example, say Dick and Jane die in a car accident, the deaths are judged to be simultaneous and the proceeds are distributed to 5 people equally. However, a case can be made that Jane died first and Dick's will names his son Joe as sole beneficiary. After the joint account proceeds are distributed, Joe files suit claiming that Jane died first so when Dick died he was the sole owner of the account and that Joe is entitled to the entire proceeds as Joe is Dick's sole beneficiary in Dick's will.

If Joe wins the case in court and the court decides that Jane died first and that Joe is entitled to the entire proceeds then Vanguard would have to find a way to clawback the distributions (which may have already been spent) or be on the hook for the difference.
Sounds logical to me. Thanks for the example.

One thing I was trying to avoid by designating beneficiaries (both Primary and Contingent) was in the likely event that I die before DW, that she wouldn't have to set up new beneficiaries. Although it's easy to do, it's also possible that she'd forget to do that. So, the way our Fidelity brokerage account is set up is that we are joint owners with the kids as primary beneficiaries (per stirpes). No need to change anything when one of us passes. VG doesn't allow this. Like I said above, this was one of the more minor reasons we switched to Fidelity. There were other things.
PatrickA5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 11:58 AM   #24
Full time employment: Posting here.
beowulf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 798
I'm confused. I thought the plan was to die with no assets and several checks that hadn't cleared yet?
__________________
Mission accomplished - not necessarily ER, but certainly R.
beowulf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 12:06 PM   #25
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ExFlyBoy5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: ATL --> Flyover Country
Posts: 6,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by 24601NoMore View Post
Appreciate the concern and good advice..

What I probably didn't mention is that I spent 25+ years writing very complex legal contracts for Fortune 500 companies in my w*rk. This involved working with attorneys at well-known F500 companies with household names trying to tear my work apart and rip me to ribbons - which they never succeeded at. So, in short - I get it. This is what I did for a very long time..

I'm extremely confident in my ability to take a basic will from any of the online sites or PC apps and review it to the point I'm confident. Not as confident in the whole trust aspect, as I don't pretend to to understand all the ins and outs of trusts - but am also convinced we don't need that. But based on writing literally hundreds of contracts for F500 companies over the years..if I can't write something that is equal to what an attorney is going to OVER charge me (by 10X), something is seriously wrong with my professional experience..

In short, while I appreciate the concern, you guys are going to have a very hard time convincing me that an attorney is going to have some magic pixie dust that is going to materially impact the net result of a will. In the end, these are comparatively simple unless you have some wonky personal situation, which we don't. I simply don't believe it, and $2K to spend an hour with me and have a paralegal put a bunch of data into an app to generate a template-based doc that they then give me is simply not worth $2K+.

Two points.

1. Re: playing attorney and writing your own will: A man who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client.

2. Re: NOLO, LegalZoom, Etc.: These are NOT law firms and thus are not required to abide by the code of ethics that every attorney in the US has to abide by. Oh yeah, they can't be sued for malpractice, either since they don't offer legal advice. A "real" attorney? They can be sued.
__________________
FIRE'd in 2014 @ 40 Years Old
Professional Retiree
ExFlyBoy5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 12:13 PM   #26
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Elyria, OH
Posts: 1,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
An educated guess on my part is that since if they did offer beneficiary designations for joint accounts, the only situation where the beneficiaries would come into play is where the joint account owners died simultaneously... if one died before the other then the ownership of the joint account would go to the surviving joint account owner (who could then change beneficiaries if they wish to).

Since whether the joint owners died simultaneously or not can be subjective, by not allowing beneficiary designations for joint accounts they avoid the simultaneous death issue entirely and the possibility of paying out to the beneficiaries based on a simultaneous death that is later changed and results in a change in how the proceeds would have been distributed.

For example, say Dick and Jane die in a car accident, the deaths are judged to be simultaneous and the proceeds are distributed to 5 people equally. However, a case can be made that Jane died first and Dick's will names his son Joe as sole beneficiary. After the joint account proceeds are distributed, Joe files suit claiming that Jane died first so when Dick died he was the sole owner of the account and that Joe is entitled to the entire proceeds as Joe is Dick's sole beneficiary in Dick's will.

If Joe wins the case in court and the court decides that Jane died first and that Joe is entitled to the entire proceeds then Vanguard would have to find a way to clawback the distributions (which may have already been spent) or be on the hook for the difference.
Then why do other financial institutions allow beneficiary designations on joint accounts? Their legal departments are much more aware of these possibilities than the average person.

Joint accounts WROS usually aren't governed under a will. States also have varying laws about survivorship, usually measured in days. Then there's the Uniform Simultaneous Death Act (120 hours), which may govern when there is no will, or a beneficiary of a life insurance policy and the insured die at the same time. In the latter case, the named alternate beneficiary would get the policy proceeds.

My state has a Simultaneous Death Act that says (in the absence of a longer survivorship clause in a will) that unless there's clear and convincing evidence that the survivor of jointly owned property WROS survived at least 120 hours after the death of the other (assume only 2 joint owners for simplicity), then ownership reverts to joint tenants in common. 50% of the property would then pass via probate under the terms of each decedent's will. POD accounts/property are specifically exempt from probate.

The above leads me to believe that Joe would receive proceeds of the POD account only if he is a named beneficiary, and in the percentage designated. POD designations always trump what the will says, or intestate law.

And I've done enough online research on this matter for today. It's easily confirmed with a little effort at your leisure.
gwraigty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 12:20 PM   #27
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,266
I'm guessing that Vanguard and others have arrived at different judgements as to the significance of the risk.

Given that not all states have a Simultaneous Death Act in place that is probably yet another reason to avoid the issue.

So in your state Joe would lose and in another state he might prevail... so if Vanguard gives it to you because you live in a state with a Simultaneous Death Act but then you move to a state that does not.... their risk is increased. Easier to just say no to everyone and if Fidelity and others are willing to accept the risk then good for them.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 12:25 PM   #28
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Elyria, OH
Posts: 1,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldShooter View Post
In our estate plan, it explicitly says that in a common disaster it will be assumed that I predeceased DW. This lets the plan run cleanly, my part first then hers. No mixing up. Do your home-made documents include language like this? Maybe. Maybe not.
"Home-made" documents aren't really. You make it sound like OP wants to type whatever in a word processing program. We used Willmaker to draft several of our wills over the years. (We used a lawyer for our first and weren't impressed.) These DIY solutions use state specific laws and are appropriate in many cases, including naming guardians for minor children, specific bequests, survivorship clauses, etc. There are detailed instructions. They may not be the best option for complicated situations.

It sounds as if OP only needs the will to cover non-POD/TOD assets, which needn't be an overly complicated scenario. My suggestion, several posts back, would allow OP to draft this will in a way that would be good for quite awhile. No having to change because of an account change, etc.
gwraigty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 12:28 PM   #29
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Elyria, OH
Posts: 1,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatrickA5 View Post
Sounds logical to me. Thanks for the example.
It may sound logical, but it may not be right, no offense intended to pb4. See my post for why. POD designations cannot just be ignored.
gwraigty is offline   Reply With Quote
A couple thoughts
Old 08-12-2019, 12:52 PM   #30
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Cobra9777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,024
A couple thoughts

I would not tolerate a financial institution telling me I can't designate TOD/POD on a joint account. That's ridiculous. I'd move the money somewhere else.

Our portfolio at Fidelity consists of Vanguard and iShares ETFs. iShares trade for free but Vanguard ETFs incur a $4.95 commission on trades (which are rare for us). Vanguard mutual funds would be very costly to trade at Fidelity.

Fidelity money market funds work fine for the small amount of cash we hold.

Texas allows TOD on real estate and motor vehicles. And all of our financial accounts have proper beneficiary designations, including TOD/POD on joint accounts. That covers everything except household goods, which the kids can sell or divide up however they see fit.

We both have wills that we did on LegalZoom several years ago for maybe $200. That included living wills and durable POAs. But with the set-up above, everything will transfer outside of probate. The wills would never be needed for anything. The living wills and durable POAs are quite necessary and well worth the cost.

Our situation is very straightforward. But if there were complicated relationships or business assets, or if I lived in a state without TOD on real estate, I would not hesitate to hire a pro.
__________________
Retired at 52 in July 2013. On to better things...
AA: 85/15 WR: 2.7% SI: 2 pensions, SS later
Cobra9777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 01:02 PM   #31
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Souschef View Post
We have a loose leaf binder given to us when we did our estate planning. In the front cover There are 3 pieces of paper. One has all my passwords,...
What purpose does it serve for someone to have your passwords after you are dead?
JustCurious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 01:02 PM   #32
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Castro Valley
Posts: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExFlyBoy5 View Post
Two points.

1. Re: playing attorney and writing your own will: A man who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client.

2. Re: NOLO, LegalZoom, Etc.: These are NOT law firms and thus are not required to abide by the code of ethics that every attorney in the US has to abide by. Oh yeah, they can't be sued for malpractice, either since they don't offer legal advice. A "real" attorney? They can be sued.
A cliche that's too simplistic. I wouldn't compare a simple Will to defending one's self in a murder trial.
jkern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 01:20 PM   #33
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Elyria, OH
Posts: 1,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustCurious View Post
What purpose does it serve for someone to have your passwords after you are dead?
Passwords may be necessary in the event of incapacity, for simple things. For example, most of our bills are paperless and come to my email address. With those passwords, my husband would be able to login and change the email address so the bills would come to his email instead.
gwraigty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 01:20 PM   #34
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
OldShooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: City
Posts: 10,337
We have never been advised to use TOD, so I have not thought much about it until I started hearing about it in this forum.

It seems quite inflexible to me. For example, hypothesize that your spouse (if any) predeceases you and you become legally incompetent due to Alzheimers. Then your TOD beneficiary dies. Five years later you die. Left alone I suppose the asset goes into the benficiary's estate. Do you TOD-ers assume this is OK? That you have a POA who will probably change the TOD to do what you'd wish? Do you just not worry about unpleasant scenarios?

Not looking to argue. Just curious.
OldShooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 01:21 PM   #35
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ExFlyBoy5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: ATL --> Flyover Country
Posts: 6,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkern View Post
A cliche that's too simplistic. I wouldn't compare a simple Will to defending one's self in a murder trial.
I can tell you many stories of probate that *should* have been simple but were anything but. I stand by what I said.
__________________
FIRE'd in 2014 @ 40 Years Old
Professional Retiree
ExFlyBoy5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 01:34 PM   #36
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwraigty View Post
Passwords may be necessary in the event of incapacity, for simple things. For example, most of our bills are paperless and come to my email address. With those passwords, my husband would be able to login and change the email address so the bills would come to his email instead.
Yes, I can see the value for bills, I was thinking in terms of financial accounts. I don't think it would be wise to access someone's bank or brokerage account using their username and password after they are dead.
JustCurious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 01:40 PM   #37
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Elyria, OH
Posts: 1,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldShooter View Post
We have never been advised to use TOD, so I have not thought much about it until I started hearing about it in this forum.

It seems quite inflexible to me. For example, hypothesize that your spouse (if any) predeceases you and you become legally incompetent due to Alzheimers. Then your TOD beneficiary dies. Five years later you die. Left alone I suppose the asset goes into the benficiary's estate. Do you TOD-ers assume this is OK? That you have a POA who will probably change the TOD to do what you'd wish? Do you just not worry about unpleasant scenarios?

Not looking to argue. Just curious.
It's not inflexible because you can name more than one TOD beneficiary, both as primaries and contingent. The forms at Fidelity and Schwab allows for up to 4 primary and 4 contingent. Up to 8 people would have to predecease us before the accounts would have to go through probate. A POA wouldn't have to change anything. You could also prohibit or allow the POA to do this in your documentation.
gwraigty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 01:42 PM   #38
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Elyria, OH
Posts: 1,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustCurious View Post
Yes, I can see the value for bills, I was thinking in terms of financial accounts. I don't think it would be wise to access someone's bank or brokerage account using their username and password after they are dead.
It shouldn't be necessary either. Contact to handle any necessary business after a death could be handled by phone, or for a joint account, another login could be set up.
gwraigty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 02:30 PM   #39
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldShooter View Post
We have never been advised to use TOD, so I have not thought much about it until I started hearing about it in this forum.

It seems quite inflexible to me. For example, hypothesize that your spouse (if any) predeceases you and you become legally incompetent due to Alzheimers. Then your TOD beneficiary dies. Five years later you die. Left alone I suppose the asset goes into the benficiary's estate. Do you TOD-ers assume this is OK? That you have a POA who will probably change the TOD to do what you'd wish? Do you just not worry about unpleasant scenarios?

Not looking to argue. Just curious.
Another example... hypothesize that your spouse (if any) predeceases you and you become legally incompetent due to Alzheimers. Then the beneficiary designated in your will dies. Five years later you die. Left alone I suppose the asset goes into the benficiary's estate under the terms of your will. Do you assume this is OK?
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2019, 03:48 PM   #40
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
OldShooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: City
Posts: 10,337
In our wills and trusts, lower-probability events are anticipated as much as possible. Almost all the money actually goes into trusts to protect against spendthrifts, judgments, divorcing spouses, etc. In the event of deaths of beneficiaries, etc. there are alternatives but the ultimate alternative is that the trust balance goes to charity.

We also do a couple of "clever" things like create a trust for grandchildren's education that, if they do not go for post-secondary education, is donated to charity. "Use it or lose it" motivation to pursue education. We have a special needs grandchild, too. His trust is carefully written so that it will not interfere with any government benefits he may receive at some point.
OldShooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pre Listing Offers On My House RockyMtn Other topics 18 10-08-2015 08:26 AM
Listing a car for sale on ebay Buckeye Other topics 29 11-27-2013 03:32 PM
SEC now listing companies with ties to State Sponsors of Terrorism Olav23 FIRE and Money 2 06-28-2007 09:02 AM
Durn funny ebay listing cute fuzzy bunny Other topics 5 03-30-2004 09:02 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.