|
|
05-03-2015, 09:42 AM
|
#1
|
Dryer sheet aficionado
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 26
|
Market Timing
An interesting overview of market timing.... and its many flaws.
Calling the Turns: Why Market Timing Is So Hard
__________________
"We grow neither better or worse as we get older, but we become more like ourselves."
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
Thanks: most useful for me
05-03-2015, 01:20 PM
|
#2
|
Dryer sheet wannabe
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 12
|
Thanks: most useful for me
From that article's endnotes:
According to the SPIVA Scorecard compiled by S&P Dow Jones Indices, for periods ended December 31, 2014, 76.25% of actively managed U.S. large-cap equity funds underperformed the S&P 500 for 3 years, 88.65% for 5 years, and 82.07% for 10 years.
|
|
|
05-04-2015, 12:39 PM
|
#3
|
Dryer sheet wannabe
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 21
|
It's not merely that active fund managers, as a group, can't predict market turning points. The lower (or higher) the market goes, the more convinced they become that the turning point is nowhere in sight. They are least likely to think the market has bottomed when the market bottoms, and least likely to think it has topped when the market tops. Burton Malkiel presented the evidence of this in A Random Walk Down Wall Street. In that classic book, he looked at stock fund managers allocation to cash as evidence for or against their ability to time the market. He found that cash allocations were highest at the past market bottoms of 1970, 1974, 1982, 1987, 1990, 1994 (just before the dot-com bubble began), and 2002. In all these cases, fund managers cash allocations should have been lowest, not highest, in anticipation of the recovery rallies about to begin. He found the opposite for market tops--low cash allocations, when cash allocations should have been high in anticipation of the coming market crashes.
If you think about it, it's not surprising that fund managers are terrible at timing changes in the market's direction. In fact, it has to be this way. Fund managers and other institutional investors are the market, in that they account for the vast majority of the market's trading volume. And the market cannot time itself. The market is a mechanism for pricing expectations about the future. When the market bottoms, prices--and expectations about the future--reach their lowest point. Fund managers who sell their stocks and raise their allocation to cash in market troughs are simply reflecting the market's consensus opinion about the future. As a group they must reflect this opinion, because they are the market. At the exact moment when the market is about to rally, the professionals who comprise the market peer into their crystal balls and conclude that the future looks even bleaker than it did a month ago, a week ago, and a day ago. They then bid down the prices of stocks to the lowest level they will reach. The money they raise selling their stocks goes to cash investments--hence the high allocations to cash Malkiel has observed at market bottoms. The same process happens in reverse, when the market reaches a top. The market cannot time itself; the pros that comprise the market are inevitably completely wrong in their future expectations at market tops and bottoms.
It follows that there can never be a successful market timing strategy that isn't also completely secret and known to only a few people. If a strategy that could, say, predict a market bottom 10 days in advance were to actually become widely known, then everyone would act on it, and market bottoms would simply move so that they occurred 10 days sooner than they used to occur. So if anyone reading this actually figures out a successful market timing strategy, don't tell anyone (except me--I will keep your secret )!
|
|
|
05-06-2015, 02:07 AM
|
#4
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,098
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redhead50
From that article's endnotes:
According to the SPIVA Scorecard compiled by S&P Dow Jones Indices, for periods ended December 31, 2014, 76.25% of actively managed U.S. large-cap equity funds underperformed the S&P 500 for 3 years, 88.65% for 5 years, and 82.07% for 10 years.
|
under performing funds though have little to do with under performing those same percentages as investors.
there are thousands of funds with little investor money out there , most are funds few even heard of. many are at the top one year and the bottom the next , but there is that core in the middle that hold most of investors money that do quite well.
when you follow the money you get a very different story.
i would guess and say 80% of investor money is in 20% of the funds . most of those mega funds have done quite well beating their benchmarks over most of the time frames.
all one has to do is follow the money and the odds of beating indexing goes up by a lot .
Fidelity beat benchmarks by $35 billion, but does anyone care? | Reuters
|
|
|
05-06-2015, 05:34 AM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,867
|
Market Timing
Trying to time the market is a fools game...I buy index and dividend ETFs and let the market do what it will. I don't sell I buy as I have no desire to watch my investments hourly. Way too stressful and likely unnecessary and ineffective.
http://www.transparentinvesting.com/...wholestory.pdf
Sent from my iPad using Early Retirement Forum
|
|
|
05-06-2015, 08:21 AM
|
#6
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,806
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107
under performing funds though have little to do with under performing those same percentages as investors.
there are thousands of funds with little investor money out there , most are funds few even heard of. many are at the top one year and the bottom the next , but there is that core in the middle that hold most of investors money that do quite well.
when you follow the money you get a very different story.
i would guess and say 80% of investor money is in 20% of the funds . most of those mega funds have done quite well beating their benchmarks over most of the time frames.
all one has to do is follow the money and the odds of beating indexing goes up by a lot .
Fidelity beat benchmarks by $35 billion, but does anyone care? | Reuters
|
I looked at the Fidelity Low Priced Stock fund he uses as an example in that article. For the most recent 5 years, it has tracked SPY in total return almost exactly. Not sure you can trade on this advice w/o a time machine.
PerfCharts - StockCharts.com - Free Charts
-ERD50
|
|
|
05-06-2015, 08:44 AM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2006
Location: west coast, hi there!
Posts: 8,797
|
ERD50, you might want to use Vmvix, mid value fund, as the benchmark.
|
|
|
05-06-2015, 08:59 AM
|
#8
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,806
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lsbcal
ERD50, you might want to use Vmvix, mid value fund, as the benchmark.
|
Perhaps that is more technically correct, but for me personally, the S&P 500 is my 'go-to' investment, so I benchmark against that.
But I was curious, so I ran it, and VMVIX outperforms their active FLPSX, but generally track pretty well - (5 year time frame again):
PerfCharts - StockCharts.com - Free Charts
-ERD50
|
|
|
05-06-2015, 10:28 AM
|
#10
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 7,968
|
60/40 full auto AND keep yer dang finger off the trigger! Let those non emotional computers re balance.
May the force be with you. Stay the course. Hurry up just stand there. Revision to the mean.
You can add the sources of the above quotes later. Hint - it's a test.
heh heh heh - Now in my case with hindsight back to 1966 it is amazing how something so simple was so hard to do.
|
|
|
05-06-2015, 10:35 AM
|
#11
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 903
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by unclemick
60/40 full auto AND keep yer dang finger off the trigger! Let those non emotional computers re balance.
|
Maybe I just haven't found it but does Vanguard have an auto-rebalance option? Currently invested in the Target Retirement funds right now because all I need to do there is set up auto deposit in time with my paycheck.
|
|
|
05-07-2015, 09:28 AM
|
#12
|
Dryer sheet aficionado
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 34
|
I haven't seen a way to auto-balance. I'd be curious about this as well. I know I should do it, but I don't think I ever have! I'm primarily in Vanguard index funds, so haven't given it much thought.
Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum
|
|
|
05-07-2015, 09:34 AM
|
#13
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,000
|
Yes, and you are using it. Any of their balanced funds, including Target Retirement, is auto-rebalanced.
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
05-07-2015, 09:36 AM
|
#14
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,000
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evie
I haven't seen a way to auto-balance. I'd be curious about this as well. I know I should do it, but I don't think I ever have! I'm primarily in Vanguard index funds, so haven't given it much thought.
|
You might want to check out the Vanguard Balanced Index Fund.
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
05-07-2015, 11:17 AM
|
#15
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 903
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo
|
That's a straight up 60/40 split though and international allocation.
The only Vanguard funds I know of with auto-rebalancing and international allocation are the LifeStrategy and Target Retirement funds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo
Yes, and you are using it. Any of their balanced funds, including Target Retirement, is auto-rebalanced.
|
I was thinking more along the lines of one where you can set your customized target allocation using Admiral shares or something.
|
|
|
02-20-2017, 11:00 AM
|
#16
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,844
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redhead50
From that article's endnotes:
According to the SPIVA Scorecard compiled by S&P Dow Jones Indices, for periods ended December 31, 2014, 76.25% of actively managed U.S. large-cap equity funds underperformed the S&P 500 for 3 years, 88.65% for 5 years, and 82.07% for 10 years.
|
I think the SPIVA Scorecard needs to be mentioned more on this forum. It looks like this thread from 2015 has the most recent mention. It quantifies what people refer to all the time. Currently, "91.91% of funds underperformed the S&P 500...8.09% of funds outperformed the S&P 500." One in 100 is the stat I've heard most often. People should know where to find the real stats.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107
i would guess and say 80% of investor money is in 20% of the funds . most of those mega funds have done quite well beating their benchmarks over most of the time frames.
all one has to do is follow the money and the odds of beating indexing goes up by a lot .
|
I have no clue about the percentages, but my thinking goes something like that too.
|
|
|
02-20-2017, 11:22 AM
|
#17
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,669
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hnzw_rui
That's a straight up 60/40 split though and international allocation.
The only Vanguard funds I know of with auto-rebalancing and international allocation are the LifeStrategy and Target Retirement funds.
I was thinking more along the lines of one where you can set your customized target allocation using Admiral shares or something.
|
Vanguard Star VGSTX also rebalances to 60/40. The underlying funds are not strict index funds, though.
|
|
|
02-20-2017, 11:41 AM
|
#18
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris M
... Burton Malkiel presented the evidence of this in A Random Walk Down Wall Street...
...cash allocations were highest at the past market bottoms of 1970, 1974, 1982, 1987, 1990, 1994 (just before the dot-com bubble began), and 2002...
... the opposite for market tops--low cash allocations, when cash allocations should have been high in anticipation of the coming market crashes...
|
I do not know if all of that can be blamed on MF managers. When their shareholders draw out money in a market downturn, they have to raise cash to get ahead of redemption. Even if they want to buy, where's the money to buy? Conversely, in a frothy market, there's a deluge of money coming in, and they have to buy.
In 2000, I read an article about a mutual fund where people called in and yelled that the fund did not get fully invested. They said "I send in money for you to invest, not to sit in cash". Some MF managers were scared like hell, but could they do if they did not buy? Their performance would trail the S&P, and it looked bad. People would withdraw money, causing them to sell, and they trail the market even more!
Yep. I wish I had cut out that article to save it. And look at the highly esteemed Wellesley and Wellington funds in the late 90s to see how badly they trailed the market. They did not join in the dot-com mania!
Anyway, if one wants to go against the masses, to try to raise cash when you think that the market is topping out, and to load up when the market tanks, you have to do it yourself. Don't count on MF managers to do it. Whether they are smart or not, they are constrained and do not have the freedom you do as an individual.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)
"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
|
|
|
02-20-2017, 11:56 AM
|
#19
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
|
This subject of market timing comes up every so often. People fail to recognize that MF managers' actions are driven by the masses. And so, how can a MF manager act against the masses, who are their clients.
I like to compare this to politics. Politicians are no saint, but we keep forgetting who votes them into office. Where does the root cause lie?
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)
"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
|
|
|
02-20-2017, 04:28 PM
|
#20
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,778
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107
|
Just curious, does that account for the fees?
I ask because when fees are not subtracted, my Fidelity account (FA-managed) is slightly outperforming my Vanguard account (self-managed, mostly index funds). However, when the 1% Fidelity/FA fee is subtracted, the Vanguard account comes out on top.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|