Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Maybe the end of the world is not in sight
Old 05-18-2012, 06:10 AM   #1
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
donheff's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 10,396
Maybe the end of the world is not in sight

With the global economy poised for a potential Crisis Round 2 (or 3, or whatever) we may be in store for another round of wailing and gnashing of the teeth about portfolio survivability this summer. So it was a breath of fresh air this morning to read Wade Pfau's summary of Bengen's "How Much is Enough article. Basically, Bengen (and Pfau confirmed) took a 2000 retiree to date and tacked on the 1969-86 worst case in history scenario and found that a 4% traditional SWR survives with commonly used portfolio compositions. Pfau doubled down to make things even worse and:
And just one final note, for those out there predicting very serious doom and gloom and catastrophe still awaiting the U.S. economy. What happens if we make one more change to an already extremely bad luck case of 2000-2011 plus 1969-1986? What will happen if economic catastrophe begins this summer (coming to a theater near you) resulting in a 65% stock market drop for both large-cap and small-cap stocks in the year 2012, and otherwise keeping the characteristics of this already quite gloomy scenario? Well, the 4% barrier will be broken, but things would not turn out nearly as bad as you might have expected in such circumstances. Depending on the asset allocation, the sustainable withdrawal rate will turn out to be 3.43% or 3.46%.
So, with another crash this summer and inflation ahead those of us with a pretty low SWR may still survive. Or not - history may not repeat itself.
Every man is, or hopes to be, an Idler. -- Samuel Johnson
donheff is online now   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 05-18-2012, 05:20 PM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,287
Well, that is certainly encouraging. I'll cut my meds to the standard ration instead of the double trank I was planning ...
ejman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 01:44 PM   #3
Full time employment: Posting here.
Focus's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 614
It's not that encouraging. In the end, although he allows that the 2000-era retirees might just make it with 4%, he writes:

In conclusion, the 4% rule is not safe. It certainly hasnít worked out well for a number of other developed market countries. I love the U.S.A., but I worry that the country wonít always enjoy the same fantastic financial market returns as it did in the 20th century.
Focus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2012, 06:20 PM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,287
Originally Posted by wishin&hopin View Post
It's not that encouraging. I
Well, I just did some quick calculating and assuming I check out as scheduled at age 100 (ha!) even assuming 0% return I ought to check out at that age bouncing my last check so I am not going to worry about it... Double trank not called for at this point but will keep it under observation.
ejman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2012, 03:59 PM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 29,553
Sounds encouraging to me! That was quite a doomsday scenario. I'm sticking with 3.33% withdrawal rate plan.
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

» Quick Links

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.