Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Mid 50's or younger... are you counting on Social Security?
Old 02-09-2020, 02:52 PM   #1
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 900
Mid 50's or younger... are you counting on Social Security?

I will be 56 in a month and while currently FI, I continue to work part time by choice. I have shared before on this site that I have plans for Fat Fire which excludes any dependency on Social Security. I am part of a neighborhood retirement/social club that includes mostly guys from their early to later 60's and I have noticed it is clear Social Security is part of their plan... a leg of stool.
While my plan basically ignores SS, all the talk in my local group had me go run the SS calculator and to my surprise, it shows that if I wait until 70, between my wife and I we could have almost $60K coming our way. This got me looking up the latest on the solvency of SS...

"As a result of changes to Social Security enacted in 1983, benefits are now expected to be payable in full on a timely basis until 2037, when the trust fund reserves are projected to become exhausted. At the point where the reserves are used up, continuing taxes are expected to be enough to pay 76 percent of scheduled benefits." Ssa.gov

So, this sort of prompts a number of questions for people roughly my age and younger...

- Should we expect SS to be there in full for our life time? Will the politics be strong enough to effect SS for years to come?
- Should we take the current solvency at face value? If so, what does that do to your timing/plans to start taking SS?
- If, like me, you did not factor SS in your modeling... should you? And if you do, how will you/should you adjust your spending up until you start taking withdrawals?

There are worst plans in the world... just plan on SS as found money. But, at the same time, if you believe it will be there, you effectively could make an argument to "blow the dough" a little more aggressively up until then.

What say you?
DawgMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 02-09-2020, 02:56 PM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,340
I'm only 40 and i'm expecting SS to be there at at least 75% of current payout. I will not be a high net worth person and if I was I would be less sure about SS since I think it could be means tested in the future.
aaronc879 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 03:02 PM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,290
Im 53. I have factored it in to my plans and hope to wait till I'm 70 ( 2036) to start collecting. Nothing is guaranteed, but my sense is at the very least we will get 80% + ( probably 100%) of what SS tells us. I think there is a tendency on this board for people to be over conservative about these topics.
FREE866 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 03:07 PM   #4
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 900
Quote:
Originally Posted by FREE866 View Post
Im 53. I have factored it in to my plans and hope to wait till I'm 70 ( 2036) to start collecting. Nothing is guaranteed, but my sense is at the very least we will get 80% + ( probably 100%) of what SS tells us. I think there is a tendency on this board for people to be over conservative about these topics.
I hope you are right. there are allot of "what ifs" out there. I am the tail end of the baby boomers so my people are "large and in charge" when it comes to politics. I think it could be political suicide for either party to "take away our toys". That said, at some point the math has got to work so i suspect somethings will start to ding it (i.e. net worth, gross retirement income).
DawgMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 03:09 PM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,390
I am age 50 and SS is a part of my future plans.
I have my pension, tira, and roth ira to take from as I age. SS is certainly a part of my future plans and I am certainly counting on some percentage of it being there.
__________________
Understanding both the power of compound interest and the difficulty of getting it is the heart and soul of understanding a lot of things. Charlie Munger

The first rule of compounding: Never interupt it unnecessarily. Charlie Munger
UnrealizedPotential is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 03:11 PM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgMan View Post
I hope you are right. there are allot of "what ifs" out there. I am the tail end of the baby boomers so my people are "large and in charge" when it comes to politics. I think it could be political suicide for either party to "take away our toys". That said, at some point the math has got to work so i suspect somethings will start to ding it (i.e. net worth, gross retirement income).

Here's an article with some good info IMO:

https://www.fisherinvestments.com/en...security-myths
FREE866 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 03:13 PM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 2,637
This topic has been beat to death on this forum and many others.

I'm also in my 50's and factor SS into my calculations based on the currently promised benefit amount because those dollars will be just as spendable as the dollars in my stash. It's not a bonus, it's an earned benefit. I look at it no differently than the funds that will come out of my IRA, 457B, brokerage, CDs, etc.

I also factor in that those SS dollars will be 85% taxable because of the yearly post-tax SS benefit cut explained here:

https://www.early-retirement.org/for...ml#post2367635

If there are even greater cuts to SS benefits in the future, including yet another increase in the FRA, I will take comfort in knowing that I have a big cushion of stash that will allow an enjoyable retirement with plenty of discretionary spending that isn't dependent on the full promised SS benefit. And even if it is cut in the future, I don't expect it to disappear completely, so I will continue to figure it into my calculations.
GenXguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 03:19 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
CaliKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Ex-Cali
Posts: 1,231
I am 50'ish and do not consider SS at all. If it happens will be bonus spending money. I feel fortunate to be in this position.
__________________
______________________
The plan was September 1, 2022 and I am 95% there. Still working a few hours a week at the real job.
CaliKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 03:30 PM   #9
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 900
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenXguy View Post
This topic has been beat to death on this forum and many others.

I'm also in my 50's and factor SS into my calculations based on the currently promised benefit amount because those dollars will be just as spendable as the dollars in my stash. It's not a bonus, it's an earned benefit. I look at it no differently than the funds that will come out of my IRA, 457B, brokerage, CDs, etc.

I also factor in that those SS dollars will be 85% taxable because of the yearly post-tax SS benefit cut explained here:

https://www.early-retirement.org/for...ml#post2367635

If there are even greater cuts to SS benefits in the future, including yet another increase in the FRA, I will take comfort in knowing that I have a big cushion of stash that isn't dependent on the full promised SS benefit. And even if it is cut in the future, I don't expect it to disappear completely, so I will continue to figure it into my calculations.
I suppose I am coming from the angle of what your level of confidence is if it will be there if you are in a certain age group and what it does to your plan. In theory, if you believe you have say $60K coming your way at age 70 and thereafter, that's effectively a $1.5M investment injection (assuming the 4% rule). That's a big deal for many. If you think it will be there, you can adjust your spending (or perhaps retire even earlier) prior to say 70 by that $60K (example) additional income. It moves the needle and can be a game changer for many.
DawgMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 03:37 PM   #10
Recycles dryer sheets
Cayman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 440
I'm early 50s and RE'd about 2 years. Firecalc says we're 100% without inputting SS. We won't rely on it, but fully expect to receive it - We paid for it!
We plan to take SS at 70.
Cayman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 03:38 PM   #11
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 226
I'm 48 and I think SS will be there for me but at probably a reduced level from now. I'm assuming about 75% of what the current benefits are for modelling.

I don't expect to actually need the SS money so I'm not as worried about it as someone who will rely on it. My current plans are to claim as late as possible to use SS as longevity insurance so I don't think I will claim earlier based on solvency. At current projections I'll hit FRA after SS needs to be cut for solvency so I don't know if it will matter.
geeky_grrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 03:38 PM   #12
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,971
I heard a SS expert talk the other day on a podcast and he said even when it goes belly up in 2035 or whenever it’s supposed to be broke, it still will be able to payout close to an 80% level.
So do I need it? No. Will I take even at 80% ish? Yes.
COcheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 03:45 PM   #13
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 394
54 YO here. When I input data for retirement modeling programs I discount the SS numbers by 50 %. I have a decent-sized nest egg and I strongly suspect that that will be used against me when it comes time to claim.
Scratchy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 03:47 PM   #14
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,535
I expect to receive what SSA.gov has me projected to receive. It would be political suicide to cut benefits. My wife is a government employee. They advertise the three legged retirement. TSP(their 401K), their pension and the third leg is SS. They are union. I can't see the federal government going back on that employment/retirement promise. The way the federal government shuffles money around, prints more and deficit spends I don't see 2037 becoming a problem. If for some reason they cut it by 25% we will be fine. FATFIRE will become almost as fat fire.
__________________
-Big Dawg-FI since 9/2010. Failed ER in 2015. 2/15/2023=DONE! "Blow that dough"-Robbie

" People say I'm lazy, dreaming my life away Well, they give me all kinds of advice designed to enlighten me When I tell them that I'm doing fine watching shadows on the wall "Don't you miss the big time, boy. You're no longer on the ball" -John Lennon-
Bigdawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 04:24 PM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 2,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawgMan View Post
I suppose I am coming from the angle of what your level of confidence is if it will be there if you are in a certain age group and what it does to your plan. In theory, if you believe you have say $60K coming your way at age 70 and thereafter, that's effectively a $1.5M investment injection (assuming the 4% rule). That's a big deal for many. If you think it will be there, you can adjust your spending (or perhaps retire even earlier) prior to say 70 by that $60K (example) additional income. It moves the needle and can be a game changer for many.
I'm closer to 55, so I think that by the time any legislation was to be passed to cut benefits or raise the FRA, I'm more likely to be across the age threshold of those affected. They tend to exclude those "close to retirement" from taking a hit. I don't think my retirement income will be high enough to be affected by potential future means testing, either. So, all said, I'm confident I won't see a significant cut that others often refer to, but it's easier to be confident if you aren't dependent on the full promised SS benefit amount to live an enjoyable retirement in the first place. As a single SS recipient, I'm expecting closer to $35K/yr in today's dollars.

Of course, there are other potential results that would be worse, such as if Congress does nothing, and the SS benefits are cut across the board for all recipients when the incoming funds can only fund ~80% of benefits. Also, if a form of UBI (Universal Basic Income) was to replace Social Security among other programs which pays much less than my projected SS benefit.
GenXguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 04:45 PM   #16
Full time employment: Posting here.
MrsHaloFIRE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 928
Im mid 30s, husband mid50s. I figure he may get half and I may get nothing. If I end up with some, I will be happy. I figure theyre going to means test it at some point. Just a hunch. So it may still be around, but not for everyone.
MrsHaloFIRE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 05:40 PM   #17
Dryer sheet aficionado
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 42
Being 58 I'm a little past the mid-50's you asked input from but FWIW I tried to plan or conceptualize both with and without S.S. Works either way for me but with it guess kids will at least have more legacy $ left to them...or at least they hope so anyway (ha). Generally feel it won't go away any time soon, but would not be surprised to see it reduced by 20-25% by mid-2030's or so. With it though, for us personally even if cut by 20-25% it along with distributions from annuity would more than likely at least cover our living expenses...thus leaving more tIRA/401k, taxable, etc to do whatever or blow that dough!
John0019 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 05:47 PM   #18
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Tampa
Posts: 11,197
Still feel SS will be fixed to pay out at 100% in the future.
It is slated to provide us with 50% of spending, so it is definitely in our plan.
BTW, it is already indirectly means tested.
__________________
TGIM
Dtail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 07:21 PM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Mulligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
I am mid 50s and greatly expecting to get my SS. When I turn 62, I will immediately file and get my ~$120 a month. My lady will be so impressed when I take her out for an additional dinner each month compliments of SS.
Mulligan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 07:30 PM   #20
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,110
DH turns 57 this year and we expect to take SS at 62 (young kids so it makes sense financially). Given that it’s only 5 years away, we are factoring it into our plans. I’m turning 50, so it’s less of a sure thing. Still, we’re assuming some level of SS for me. If it’s cut to 75%, that will be fine. Just comes out of discretionary extras. If it’s totally eliminated, it may mean we need to readjust some spending plans, but it won’t lead to failure.
tb001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does it make sense to delay the younger, lower wage earning spouse Social Security? Camas Lilly FIRE and Money 27 01-30-2019 11:28 AM
Younger folks (less than 45), what are YOU doing? moneymaker FIRE and Money 26 01-24-2016 05:16 AM
Does Really Tough Exercise Make You Feel Younger? TromboneAl Health and Early Retirement 75 08-17-2015 05:42 PM
At least you can look younger RonBoyd Health and Early Retirement 43 10-21-2009 07:28 PM
Looking younger--would you if you could? hakuna matata Other topics 29 04-20-2009 02:48 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:17 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.