My next door neighbor just put his house on the market for roughly 8X the value of mine. He'll probably get pretty close to it, too: it's a remarkable house.
Doesn't mean much to me, since I love my little house and would like to stay here forever, but I'm always amused at my odd neighborhood's wide range of home valuations.
I'm curious, though. For long term home value appreciation, is it better to have more or less homegeneity in home values? Put another way, is planned subdivision development better than random growth?
My ZIP code has a few little farms and a bit of light industry, but is mostly blue-collar suburban-residential. It's a 20-minute drive from the downtown area of a city with 1/3 million population, so I think I have the best possible situation.
Doesn't mean much to me, since I love my little house and would like to stay here forever, but I'm always amused at my odd neighborhood's wide range of home valuations.
I'm curious, though. For long term home value appreciation, is it better to have more or less homegeneity in home values? Put another way, is planned subdivision development better than random growth?
My ZIP code has a few little farms and a bit of light industry, but is mostly blue-collar suburban-residential. It's a 20-minute drive from the downtown area of a city with 1/3 million population, so I think I have the best possible situation.