No soup for you!

Gatordoc50

Full time employment: Posting here.
Joined
May 17, 2011
Messages
815
Location
Marco island
We've been turned down by Wells Fargo for a mortgage for a second home based on a poor debt to income ratio of about 80 percent, even if we put 20 percent down. We have more than enough assets to pay this note but only have the wife's income. The banker stated we don't even have enough income to qualify for a 100 thousand equity line. Are there lenders who specialize in those with big cattle-small hats?
 
Yeah, I have a line of credit secured by my investment account.
 
Sorry- only sympathy here. Dh and I ran into this when we bought our house last year- they fixated on his SS plus my pension (total $34K) and ignored our assets, which are enough to pay for the house 10 times over. We ended up taking $50K out of our investments to supplement the small amount they'd loan us.


Most lenders want to resell their loans in the secondary market (to free up capital to make more loans) and the secondary market has some pretty picky definitions of "conforming" loans. People like us just fall between the cracks.
 
Aren't ERISA qualified retirement plans (ie 401k's etc) unlimited protected assets in Bankruptcy proceedings? Maybe that has something to do with it.

If I were a lender I would definitely look at these protected assets differently than after tax assets.

-gauss
 
Last edited:
Aren't ERISA qualified retirement plans (ie 401k's etc) unlimited protected assets in Bankruptcy proceedings?

If I were a lender I would definitely look at these differently than after tax assets.

-gauss

Lenders have little autonomy as almost all loans are immediately sold to Fannie/Freddie and must conform strictly to Fannie/Freddie criteria. Very few loans are kept in portfolio. Portfolio lenders are out there, but the terms are much less favorable and the loans are ARMs. If the property is in California or Arizona. try Fremont Bank. They may lend in other states as well, check with them.
 
We have had no issues so far with credit unions considering our portfolio income in refinancing. One said we had to show 3 months of steady "income", which could be moving money monthly from a savings or retirement account to a checking account for three months straight. So far we've refinanced the house and took out a home equity line of credit. We didn't end up buying a rental property but got the approval letter from the CU saying we were qualified to do so as well during this same time.
 
Last edited:
Use margin or aggregate the margin limit of your investment accounts and use that money.
Can get a cheaper margin rate than mortgage rate from most places.
 
Lenders have little autonomy as almost all loans are immediately sold to Fannie/Freddie and must conform strictly to Fannie/Freddie criteria. Very few loans are kept in portfolio. Portfolio lenders are out there, but the terms are much less favorable and the loans are ARMs. If the property is in California or Arizona. try Fremont Bank. They may lend in other states as well, check with them.

There is a mechanism for lenders to consider retirement assets in the underwriting process. See Refinancing Your Mortgage on a Fixed Income - Work and Retirement - AARP Ever...

The new rules, however, just might make all the difference — if you can find a loan officer who's willing to do the necessary legwork. Jeff Lipes, a past president of the Connecticut Mortgage Bankers Association, says the new calculations to boost retirees' eligibility go like this: Let's say a retiree has $1 million in an IRA or 401(k) and wants a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage. Lenders calculate 70 percent of that $1 million (the balance is reduced by 30 percent to account for market volatility; no rate of return is assumed). They divide that $700,000 (that's 70 percent of $1 million) by the term of the loan (such as 360 payments for a 30-year mortgage).

Using this formula gives the borrower an extra $1,944 to show for monthly income. So consider Eberle as an example. That $1,944 in assets would be added to his $2,400 monthly Social Security benefit, almost doubling his income and enhancing his ability to qualify for a mortgage. (By the way, borrowers aren't required to tap those retirement assets.)

For retirees, "this can make a significant difference in determining whether they qualify or don't qualify," Lipes says.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the input. If we break some PenFed CDs we would only be 100 thousand short. The penalty seems stiff, 30 percent of the interest we would have earned if kept to maturity. Not happy about that but we'd save on some closing costs. I'm thinking we could find a bank or credit union to lend us 100k.
 
.

Now that I am retired, have no debt, excellent credit and comfortably live on a modest income, I can not qualify for a mortgage.

Even though I have a large nest egg, it is my intentionally kept low income that is the problem.

Bottom-line, someone with a six-figure job [which he could lose tomorrow] is more mortgage worthy than someone like me who has the invested resources to buy the house outright.

Years ago I remember Dave Ramsey talking about this... now I am living it.

So, instead of getting a mortgage to buy a new home, I am still living in my paid-off home... life is good.

.
 
I guess reply # 9 and 10 cross posted with post #8 which links a solution to this issue. I asked my credit union about this and they seemed very willing to consider retirement assets using this formula.


Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum
 
We have had no issues so far with credit unions considering our portfolio income in refinancing. One said we had to show 3 months of steady "income", which could be moving money monthly from a savings or retirement account to a checking account for three months straight.

I was a year post-retirement when we applied (DH had been on SS for years). Our track record was spotty because I just moved money from the brokerage account in chunks when we needed it, sometimes extra if we had a house project that we couldn't fund from our standard monthly "allowance". Despite my lovely spreadsheet that tracked $$ in and out of the major accounts and showed that our assets had actually grown by $100K since my retirement, we didn't fit the tick boxes.:nonono:
 
I guess reply # 9 and 10 cross posted with post #8 which links a solution to this issue. I asked my credit union about this and they seemed very willing to consider retirement assets using this formula.


I just wanted to point out the absurdity of a mortgage company preferring job income [which could suddenly stop] to real assets.

But things [even things that seem negative at the time] happen for a reason.

I no longer need a mortgage because I am no longer interested in a new home. I have decided to stay put. Ironically, the best decision I could have made was made for me.

.
 
I think I need to study different ways to access capital in ER. I assumed a loan wouldn't be a problem. Silly me. I've got an application going for a home equity loan at 10 percent of the value of my home. If they turn that down it sure will make me wonder.
 
Thanks for the input. If we break some PenFed CDs we would only be 100 thousand short. The penalty seems stiff, 30 percent of the interest we would have earned if kept to maturity. Not happy about that but we'd save on some closing costs. I'm thinking we could find a bank or credit union to lend us 100k.
Try getting a passbook loan until the CD matures. It has to be cheaper than losing 30% of your interest
 
I just wanted to point out the absurdity of a mortgage company preferring job income [which could suddenly stop] to real assets.
So true.

Last year I decided to buy my home in cash. I sold mutual funds to do it, plus used my cash reserves, and replenished my portfolio somewhat with the proceeds from selling my prior home. For me, paying in cash makes life simpler, and I like not having to deal with mortgage company tyrants and all those stupid hoops they want people to jump through. I don't like to be jerked around.

But for the OP and many other forum members, YMMV and there are many ways to pay for a home.
 
Last edited:
I did a refi in July and all the credit union wanted was a copy of the award letter for my pension.


This issue applies to folks without enough pension/SS income to qualify.


Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum
 
I did a refi in July and all the credit union wanted was a copy of the award letter for my pension.


My pension is $933/month. They were not impressed.
 
I just wanted to point out the absurdity of a mortgage company preferring job income [which could suddenly stop] to real assets.

But things [even things that seem negative at the time] happen for a reason.

I no longer need a mortgage because I am no longer interested in a new home. I have decided to stay put. Ironically, the best decision I could have made was made for me.

.


One of the problems is they look at debt payments to income ratios.... so if you have low income, then you 'must' have low monthly payments...


I do not have to agree with their methods, just understand them and how to get around them if I need to....
 
One of the problems is they look at debt payments to income ratios.... so if you have low income, then you 'must' have low monthly payments...

I do not have to agree with their methods, just understand them and how to get around them if I need to....


I have zero debt. My house is paid-off and I have excellent credit.
The one and only reason I could not qualify was my low income...
which I purposefully keep low for tax purposes.

.
 
So true.

Last year I decided to buy my home in cash. I sold mutual funds to do it, plus used my cash reserves, and replenished my portfolio somewhat with the proceeds from selling my prior home. For me, paying in cash makes life simpler, and I like not having to deal with mortgage company tyrants and all those stupid hoops they want people to jump through. I don't like to be jerked around.

But for the OP and many other forum members, YMMV and there are many ways to pay for a home.


My "can't get a mortgage" experience taught me a lesson... to not have the vast majority of my nest egg locked up in investments. So now I am working on having more liquidity.

.
 
I have zero debt. My house is paid-off and I have excellent credit.

The one and only reason I could not qualify was my low income...

which I purposefully keep low for tax purposes.



.



I dont care what their computer generated guidelines say... Someone who is debt free with excellent payment history would be the type of person I would want to loan money too. The logic escapes me...I do have a very healthy pension, and I could go get over my head in debt with that through a loan, while people on this forum who could "own me" with their assets cannot...The logic escapes me.
 
Thanks for the input. If we break some PenFed CDs we would only be 100 thousand short. The penalty seems stiff, 30 percent of the interest we would have earned if kept to maturity. Not happy about that but we'd save on some closing costs. I'm thinking we could find a bank or credit union to lend us 100k.


Another option might be to use the CDs as collateral for a loan until they mature. This doesn't work if they are IRA CDs. The rate is generally 2-3 pct above the CD rate.


Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum
 
A big part of the OP's problem is likely that he/she is trying to get a mortgage for a second home. We had major problems getting a refi on our second home, even though we didn't even have a mortgage on our primary. I actually ended up buying a couple of rental units (for cash) partially to mitigate the "no income" issue. Before that happened I did manage to refi with Chase back when they were doing the Obama refinance credit thing.

I was told by many banks that I would have been able to get a mortgage on our primary residence based on our assets, but not the second home. Seems absurd, since you're making the same payment no matter which home it's on, but that's the credit industry today.

Also, back then (2010-ish) we were told that transferring money from our retirement accounts wouldn't do it. If there was a automated withdrawal from an IRA it would be fine, but manual transfers wouldn't count. Stunning levels of stupidity.
 
Back
Top Bottom