Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-01-2008, 02:13 PM   #21
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 3,176
Yes, the shares are Admiral class. I like the analysis compared to the VG TR fund, this is the kind of insight I was looking for, but as my main fund is in a TR type account I don't see a reason to change out DW's Wellsley for a TR fund. But that is some good thinking. It is easy to be happy with Wellesley when it is going down less than other funds and less than the market and when the dividends come in. But investing is a bit bigger than that and I need to keep an open mind when I am feeling most complacent.

Originally Posted by Olav23 View Post
Do you have Admiral Shares of Wellesley? If not, if you don't have a capital gain built up in Welly, I think it is a no-brainer to move to the Vanguard Target Retirement Income fund.

Here is why I would make the decision:

Expense ratio (assuming non-admiral shares): TR: .19% Well: .25%
Current Yield: TR: 4.03% Well: 4.79% (so, both get close to the magic 4%)

Asset mix:
TR: 70% bonds/30% stock
Bonds diversified into 20% tips, 45% total bond, 5% prime money market
Bond average credit quality: AAA (95% rated A or above)
Stock: 24% Total US, 6% international and emerging mkts
Average market cap: $27b (smaller market cap, so less stock allocation needed for equity returns)

Well: 63% bonds/37% stock
Bonds un-diversified: 294 bonds
Bond average credit quality: AA (85% rated A or above)
Stock: only 52 stocks! (non-diversified)
Average market cap: $46.5b

Returns: (to aug-31)
TR: 3-year pre-tax: 4.4%
Well: 3-year pre-tax: 4.23%

TR: 3-year post-tax: 3.05%
Well: 3-year post-tax: 2.62%

So, even in tax-efficiency, TR Income beats out Wellesley.

Trailing Returns, 1-yr to today:
TR: -4.23%
Well: -6.72%

Personally I know what choice I would make, mainly due to the lower credit quality of Wellesley, the smaller market cap of TR Income and the more diversification TR Income offers. But it is your judgement call!

If you want to compare all the stats:
Vanguard Target Retirement Income Report (VTINX) | Snapshot
Vanguard Wellesley Income Report (VWINX) | Snapshot
T.S. Eliot:
Old men ought to be explorers
yakers is online now   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 10-01-2008, 02:31 PM   #22
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
cute fuzzy bunny's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,702
I think you can tell the outcome of an analysis of two funds, one with a higher stock component than the other, over the past 3 years without reading any statistics.

Looking at the ten year returns on wellesley vs lifestrategy income (since TR income doesnt have a ten year track record), wellesley picks up almost a full percentage point per year in returns. Thats a lot.

That having been said, I've often recommended that people interested in "this kind of fund" buy equal amounts of LS income, TR income and Wellesley. They really do invest rather differently and in rather different approaches. Two of them have fairly decent long term results and theres no reason to expect TR income to do badly.
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
cute fuzzy bunny is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
50% Wellesley/50 % Wellington - So Simple Why didn't I do it? ejman FIRE and Money 68 08-01-2008 02:49 PM
An alternative to: Psst...Wellesley DblDoc FIRE and Money 48 05-24-2008 04:11 PM
Wellesley Comparables ferco FIRE and Money 5 01-20-2008 03:07 PM
Wellesley vs Annuity WilliamG FIRE and Money 63 12-09-2007 02:03 PM
50% VG Wellesley 50% VG Star & Get on with ER Hydroman FIRE and Money 14 09-09-2006 04:57 PM

» Quick Links

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:21 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.