View Poll Results: My Corporation Provides Me with...
|
Pension Plan Only
|
  
|
3 |
4.11% |
Matching 401k (or similar) Only
|
  
|
38 |
52.05% |
Both Pension and Matching 401k
|
  
|
32 |
43.84% |
 |
|
05-10-2008, 05:11 PM
|
#21
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 577
|
oops I have to edit above I'm 44
__________________
I highjacked a rainbow and crashed into a pot of gold - Bon Jovi
|
|
|
 |
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
05-11-2008, 05:04 PM
|
#22
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 5,579
|
Im too old for the poll, but we have both DB and 401k w/match which I am generally pleased with. Since 2001, new hires only get 401k with automatic deposit of 4% and 4% match (i.e. if you put in 0 you get 4%, but if you put in 4% company puts in 4% plus 4% match)
I just think 401k-only pensions will be a HUGE disaster for our kids. 401ks are fantastic as a supplement to some type of annuity. Maybe SS will pick up the slack, but 401ks were not meant to be a primary form of retirement savings which is happening now. Apart from this board, the general public (especially 20-somethings) will not be have the skill and discipline to build adequate savings unless some minimum stable-value type allocation is mandated (as described above) or possibly using a target date strategy. I really like the FERS type plan with a 401k-type component, a DB annuity component, and SS. Add some personal savings and you have a four legged stool.
|
|
|
05-11-2008, 05:27 PM
|
#23
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,337
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazz4cash
Im too old for the poll, but we have both DB and 401k w/match which I am generally pleased with. Since 2001, new hires only get 401k with automatic deposit of 4% and 4% match (i.e. if you put in 0 you get 4%, but if you put in 4% company puts in 4% plus 4% match)
I just think 401k-only pensions will be a HUGE disaster for our kids. 401ks are fantastic as a supplement to some type of annuity. Maybe SS will pick up the slack, but 401ks were not meant to be a primary form of retirement savings which is happening now. Apart from this board, the general public (especially 20-somethings) will not be have the skill and discipline to build adequate savings unless some minimum stable-value type allocation is mandated (as described above) or possibly using a target date strategy. I really like the FERS type plan with a 401k-type component, a DB annuity component, and SS. Add some personal savings and you have a four legged stool.
|
I personally wish my DB plans could be converted to a cash equivalent. I'd much rather have a big pile of cash in my 401k than some insurance product.
__________________
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane -- Marcus Aurelius
|
|
|
05-11-2008, 05:38 PM
|
#24
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 28,031
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2B
I personally wish my DB plans could be converted to a cash equivalent. I'd much rather have a big pile of cash in my 401k than some insurance product.
|
Same here, I would have RE'd 2 years ago if I had that option.
For the record, my company still has a pension plan, 401(k) with 0.5% match on first 6% and retiree health benefits. In the process of being bought out and the expectation is that these will soon be stopped. I only hope us oldies (over 50) get grand-fathered in.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
|
|
|
05-20-2008, 09:25 AM
|
#25
|
Dryer sheet wannabe
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 18
|
I was just reading an article on CNNmoney:
West Virginia teachers vote on pensions versus 401(k)s - May. 20, 2008
Quote:
The proportion of private sector workers who participate in a traditional pension plan has dwindled from almost 40% at the beginning of 1980 to only about 17% now.
|
On this poll alone we have had almost half the people respond that they have a pensions. I find it amusing scary that the people who are probably best off in terms of potential for comfortable retirement are the ones here on this board sharing startegies and goals, while the ones most at risk of coming up short seem to be oblivious to the vast resources of this forum, nevermind the rest of the internet.
|
|
|
05-20-2008, 09:29 AM
|
#26
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,475
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayOh
On this poll alone we have had almost half the people respond that they have a pensions. I find it amusing scary that the people who are probably best off in terms of potential for comfortable retirement are the ones here on this board sharing startegies and goals, while the ones most at risk of coming up short seem to be oblivious to the vast resources of this forum, nevermind the rest of the internet.
|
Well, for one thing I suspect this forum is skewed a little toward older workers (i.e. 40s and 50s). These are more likely to have a pension than those in their 20s and 30s. Maybe some of them are voting even when it was intended to be for folks under 40?
We also seem to have a high ratio of government employees and military folks.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
|
|
|
05-20-2008, 09:41 AM
|
#27
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,020
|
I'm 30.
401(k) only. Current employer is 100% match to 6% plus another gift in March based on being at the company for the entire year previous.. Gift is based on planned versus actual benefits spending. That gift has run 1.5% the last three years. (probably longer, but I wasn't eligible my first year here, started in May).
I've been here just over 4 years now (gosh, 9 days ago... that's pushing it for me). I've put in $50k so far. The company has put in $30k.
|
|
|
05-20-2008, 10:41 AM
|
#28
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 961
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2B
I personally wish my DB plans could be converted to a cash equivalent. I'd much rather have a big pile of cash in my 401k than some insurance product.
|
Can't you roll the lump sum of the pension over to an IRA when you leave the company?
btw - Nebraska forced people hired after 2002 into a Cash Balance pension plan b/c employees didn't fair well in the DC plan Nebraska sees red over its 401(k) plans.
|
|
|
05-20-2008, 10:46 AM
|
#29
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,475
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ats5g
Can't you roll the lump sum of the pension over to an IRA when you leave the company?
|
I suspect you could if you were offered a lump sum buyout on the pension. (And I believe you would have to roll it over to avoid penalties if you were under age 59.5, but I could be wrong.)
I suspect mine will be bought out. I have a small pension coming to me from a previous employer. I doubt the present cash value is even $20,000 -- it's something like $260 a month at 55 or $630 a month at 65. I have a feeling they may want to just cash me out of it when I turn 54 (a year before becoming eligible to collect). There's no point in them offering now when I could still croak and get nothing before turning 55.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
|
|
|
05-20-2008, 04:21 PM
|
#30
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 961
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29
I suspect you could if you were offered a lump sum buyout on the pension. (And I believe you would have to roll it over to avoid penalties if you were under age 59.5, but I could be wrong.)
|
Each person would have to check out their own plan's Summary Plan Description (SPD), but in most corporate pension plans you're able to roll the lump sum over to an IRA when you terminate service. I think you're correct that any lump sum distribution from a pension plan that is not rolled into an IRA would be subject to income taxes and possibly the 10% penalty if done before 59.5. Though there may be special plan rules if you terminate after age 55.
Quote:
I suspect mine will be bought out. I have a small pension coming to me from a previous employer. I doubt the present cash value is even $20,000 -- it's something like $260 a month at 55 or $630 a month at 65. I have a feeling they may want to just cash me out of it when I turn 54 (a year before becoming eligible to collect). There's no point in them offering now when I could still croak and get nothing before turning 55.
|
Again, check the SPD. Most corporate pension plans can only automatically "cash you out" [read: send you a check] if your lump sum is below $5,000 or so. Otherwise, you have to voluntarily take the lump sum. Though, there may be special rules spelled out in the SPD if the entire plan is terminated.
- Alec
|
|
|
05-20-2008, 06:31 PM
|
#31
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,337
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ats5g
Again, check the SPD. Most corporate pension plans can only automatically "cash you out" [read: send you a check] if your lump sum is below $5,000 or so. Otherwise, you have to voluntarily take the lump sum. Though, there may be special rules spelled out in the SPD if the entire plan is terminated.
- Alec
|
I tried to cash out but if their calcs said the cash value was over $5K you got the annuitized amount. I agree with your conclusions.
__________________
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane -- Marcus Aurelius
|
|
|
05-21-2008, 11:36 AM
|
#32
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Alexandria, Va
Posts: 1,007
|
I'm 39, but I am a govvie, so I have both a pension and a 401(k) - the TSP.
__________________
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less travelled by...
|
|
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|