Join Early Retirement Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-27-2016, 09:02 PM   #181
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-Bound View Post
It would show us where the money goes, and what we get in return. It does not solve the problem, but helps us define it.

Maybe after understanding the benefits, we will all say "it's really worth it", and become willing to spend all our own assets (not somebody else's, mind you) down to zero to get "it". But we do not really know what "it" is that costs so much.

Right now, in my area, the health insurance has gone up to more than double in just one year. Per law, insurers have to pay most of it out and not to keep it as profits. So, am I correct in saying that the healthcare cost has doubled? I assume that auditing has been done to see that insurers did not cheat on their books.

What has doubled then? Hospitals have racked up their rates to double? Drugs now cost twice as much? People are now twice as sick?

What is it? Nobody does anything. Just let Uncle Sam keep on paying. He can print more money.


Well, we do know that drug companies are raising the cost of many drugs.... some that have been on the market for many years.... look at EpiPen...

All the stories I read about the ones that get the headlines usually have a list of others that have gone way up... plus, the cost of NEW drugs seem to be much higher....
Texas Proud is offline  
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 10-27-2016, 09:13 PM   #182
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
As I mentioned in an earlier post, nobody addresses the question of why the premium goes up more than 100% in AZ, while the nation's average is 25% for ACA. Do people use more expensive drugs here?
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)

"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
NW-Bound is offline  
Old 10-28-2016, 01:10 AM   #183
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
audreyh1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 38,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Hitter View Post
that in the acronym list?
SWAG - Wild Ass Guess is part of it.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
audreyh1 is offline  
Old 10-28-2016, 05:56 AM   #184
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivinsfan View Post
That's a nice attitude because someone willl pay more because you don't want to pay anything . It will be higher bills for those of us who do pay or more taxes for everyone.
No, it is the correct attitude.

Remember how this hypothetical scenario started, the doctor wanted to charge me the rack rate (2 or 3 times higher than a person with insurance) so if he or she wants to act like a thug and charge me more, I will declare bankruptcy with a great big smile on my face.
MrPotatoChip is offline  
Old 10-28-2016, 06:07 AM   #185
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPotatoChip View Post
No, it is the correct attitude.

Remember how this hypothetical scenario started, the doctor wanted to charge me the rack rate (2 or 3 times higher than a person with insurance) so if he or she wants to act like a thug and charge me more, I will declare bankruptcy with a great big smile on my face.
If that works for you, fine, but it does not help people interested in financial independence, and it also isn't really relevant to this thread topic. If your interested in joining our forum why not tell us a little about yourself over here? Hi, I am... - Early Retirement & Financial Independence Community
MichaelB is online now  
Old 10-28-2016, 06:12 AM   #186
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,232
In 2017, both I and DW will be retired. I am looking at the option of living more off of my already taxed assets, and keeping MAGI low enough to get subsidized. The only fly in the ointment that I have discovered, SO FAR, is that there are no ACA plans offered here that allow any coverage for "out of network" care.
At first this alarmed me, and DW. She has had breast cancer treatments, and travels 100 miles for her treatment, and I am fighting a back problem that may lead to surgery.
As it turns out, all of DW's treatment, out of town, has all been "in-network" anyway.

Also, as I ponder this, I am thinking that it's probably not that big of a deal, since if we were to be treated OON, the benefit would only be the deeply discounted rate anyway. So if I spent 50K on OON back surgery, the benefit I would lose would not be 50K, but whatever the INSCO would have knocked it down to, probably more like 5 or 10K (WAGs).
The subsidy would likely save me as much as 7K anyway.

I'm still looking into this. I have only 2 years until I'm 65, but DW has 6.
The other nefarious issue with "In Network" and "Out of Network" is that it aims at a very swiftly moving target. As fees get cut, more and more caregivers are going to give the INSCOs the middle finger and move OON.
HadEnuff is offline  
Old 10-28-2016, 06:25 AM   #187
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Austin
Posts: 661
I'm starting to see others post the cost of 2017 plans on social media and the responses many of these posts are getting are disappointing.

They illustrate how terribly uneducated many people are about ACA with comments such as:

"Those are the high premiums for people with pre-existing conditions"

"That's what it costs before credits, nobody pays that much"

"It's based on your income so the more you make the more you pay" (somewhat true but I'm positive the person who made this comment doesn't understand true cost versus taxpayer funded subsidies)

"You can thank the states that didn't participate in Medicaid reform for the higher rates"

I'm afraid it's going to take more than what many appear to believe are phantom costs to fix this. Just as many mistakenly grew to believe that the cost of a doctor's visit was nothing more than their copay, many will still believe that total health care costs are the equivalent of their subsidized monthly premium.

This year I'm in the peculiar position of considering tax-loss harvesting so I can reduce the taxable dividend and CG distribution amount of my taxable accounts in order to avoid paying substantially increased healthcare premiums next year. What a ridiculous math exercise to perform, especially since I'm not (yet) a high utilizer of health care. This year I actually struggled to meet my $2K deductible but didn't even come close because there just wasn't that much wrong with me.
__________________
ER'd 6/1/2014 @ age 53. Wow, is it already 2022?
Looking4Ward is offline  
Old 10-28-2016, 06:33 AM   #188
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-Bound View Post
It would show us where the money goes, and what we get in return. It does not solve the problem, but helps us define it.

Maybe after understanding the benefits, we will all say "it's really worth it", and become willing to spend all our own assets (not somebody else's, mind you) down to zero to get "it". But we do not really know what "it" is that costs so much.

Right now, in my area, the health insurance has gone up to more than double in just one year. Per law, insurers have to pay most of it out and not to keep it as profits. So, am I correct in saying that the healthcare cost has doubled? I assume that auditing has been done to see that insurers did not cheat on their books.

What has doubled then? Hospitals have racked up their rates to double? Drugs now cost twice as much? People are now twice as sick?

What is it? Nobody does anything. Just let Uncle Sam keep on paying. He can print more money.
Part of the problem is how ACA is set up in most states. For Texas, the insurance is by county. So a county with more population will have lower costs and more choices because there are more customers looking for coverage and a larger base to spread the costs over. (BTW, this will also impact your Medicare secondary coverage costs as I learned last month when I started looking for DH.) My county has only one insurer and only HMO plans to choose from. There are 13 total plans. When I look at Dallas, there are 32 plans, three insurers, and selections of HMO and EPO. I'm about an hour away from Dallas so it's a pretty significant difference for a drive I might have to make to see a specialist anyway.

When you have fewer people to spread the costs amongst, the per person cost will be higher. Remove any competition and there's nothing holding the costs back.
BuysToys is offline  
Old 10-28-2016, 07:08 AM   #189
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida's First Coast
Posts: 7,666
Having lived in may places over our working life, being "Married" to your Doctors was a luxury we never had and never missed. We were always looking for new doctors when we moved.

Having to find a new doctor because of a plan shift, as long as they are not a prohibitive distance from our home, does not really present a problem, at least not a permanent one.

Doctor evaluation in the USA is easy as there are lots of reviews, and pretty much most doctors that have been around in an area for a while are reputable and easily reviewed. With EMR they have your info at their fingertips. I have also found that the Specialists tend to be on all of the plans in our area, but the GPs less so. We see GPs 1 or 2 times a year so that issue is somewhat moot. Typically we only use them for referrals.

Now that said where we live in St. Augustine you walk out the door and trip over doctors offices. There are 5 on my street and it is not that big a street.

So simply find another doc that is on the list call them make an intro apt for January and move on.

Oh, in this years GP search, I had to change GPs and I asked their billing people why they did not take the most prolific plans. Their answer was that they had not applied to yet. So they either are not up on the plans for do not need or want additional business. Finding a new GP took all of 15 minutes including the phone call. The BIGGEST problem I came across was that the Insurance Doc list was for the most part not up to date.
__________________
"Never Argue With a Fool, Onlookers May Not Be Able To Tell the Difference." - Mark Twain
ShokWaveRider is offline  
Old 10-28-2016, 07:38 AM   #190
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPotatoChip View Post
No, it is the correct attitude.

Remember how this hypothetical scenario started, the doctor wanted to charge me the rack rate (2 or 3 times higher than a person with insurance) so if he or she wants to act like a thug and charge me more, I will declare bankruptcy with a great big smile on my face.
I don't think you understand how bankruptcy really works. You get to keep very little. What you have gets distributed to the people you owe money to, including that doctor.

My FIRE plan doesn't work well if I go bankrupt. That would keep me from having a great big smile.
RunningBum is offline  
Old 10-28-2016, 07:41 AM   #191
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-Bound View Post
As I mentioned in an earlier post, nobody addresses the question of why the premium goes up more than 100% in AZ, while the nation's average is 25% for ACA. Do people use more expensive drugs here?
Maybe more high risk people who used to be uninsured and now are insured, and adding higher costs to your insured pool?
RunningBum is offline  
Old 10-28-2016, 08:14 AM   #192
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ivinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,953
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPotatoChip View Post
No, it is the correct attitude.

Remember how this hypothetical scenario started, the doctor wanted to charge me the rack rate (2 or 3 times higher than a person with insurance) so if he or she wants to act like a thug and charge me more, I will declare bankruptcy with a great big smile on my face.
And you somehow think the doctor who is taking care of you has any control over this situation? So in your scenario, the correct thing to do is to never seek medical care, I'm fine with you deciding not to use medical care, it's your taking the care and then thumbing your nose at the people who took care of you that's a problem for me.
ivinsfan is online now  
Old 10-28-2016, 08:32 AM   #193
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,679
My PCP up until this year took a couple of the ACA plans including the narrow network PPO plan that I had last year. In late 2015 I found out that for 2016 they would only accept the larger network version, not the narrow network (less expensive) one.

I asked the business manager for the practice why they would not be accepting the narrow network plan and she said they didn't drop it, instead the insurer told them they would not be included in the narrow network. They did not have a choice on the matter.

So we switched insurances and doctors. I liked my doctor but when it costs me an monthly increase the size of a car payment to stay with her, I become flexible.
__________________
Married, both 69. DH retired June, 2010. I have a pleasant little part time job.
Sue J is online now  
Old 10-28-2016, 08:58 AM   #194
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunningBum View Post
Maybe more high risk people who used to be uninsured and now are insured, and adding higher costs to your insured pool?
Yes, most likely. Then, here's that map again, that I linked to earlier.

What's the common demographics between these black-sheep states?

__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)

"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
NW-Bound is offline  
Old 10-28-2016, 09:01 AM   #195
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-Bound View Post
As I mentioned in an earlier post, nobody addresses the question of why the premium goes up more than 100% in AZ, while the nation's average is 25% for ACA. Do people use more expensive drugs here?
Using this as an example of premiums in Az, I compared them with my own zip code. A 30 year old male in Az faces a premium of $421, in South Fl the premium for the same policy (Ambetter Balanced Care 4) would be $256. That is a big difference in price. We know that the MLR requirement limits the total profit, so either the cost of administering the policy is much different, or as R-Bum suggests, in Az there are fewer policyholders that require proportionally more care.

Edit to add - one easy difference between the two locations is S Fl has a much higher population density.
MichaelB is online now  
Old 10-28-2016, 09:36 AM   #196
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
One final request to stay on topic - please.
MichaelB is online now  
Old 10-28-2016, 10:06 AM   #197
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blueskies123 View Post
I see many people are saying they can get a silver or bronze plan for just a few hundred dollars a month. I had UHC in Florida but UHC pulled out of ACA. When I looked at the cheaper silver plans NONE of my doctors were in network. The only plans that have my 6 doctors are $2,000 a month before the subsidy. UHC covered all my doctors and was $1200 a month before subsidy.
So my question is to those going for the $200 plans are you finding your doctors in network or you just go the closest doctor in your plan? Are you not worried about the quality of the doctor or the huge backlogs in the waiting rooms?
I am one of those considering a $30 per month HMO. Of course, I am keeping my income at the minimum.

Like you, I am very concerned about the quality of care. I have some heart issues. About 150K worth last year but I had a 4K OOP max, thank God.

I spent a lot of time comparing plans last night. In my case all of my doctors are in the HMO that are in my current PPO. Both plans are BCBS.

Like you, I am very wary of the change. BCBS dropped PPO in my area. I had great luck with BCBS so far. I don't know if I want to spend 5K more a year for a higher OOP with a different carrier. The one thing I really worry about is " no out of network coverage." We are wanting to do some RV' ing.

Sorry for the ramble but you wanted to here from " us". I am very concerned as to how it will work out for us but the nearly 5K in premium savings plus a 500/100 OOP is hard not to try.

I just don't understand how the provider saves much money with a HMO with lower premiums and OOP max over a PPO with basically the same network.

Murf
Murf2 is online now  
Old 10-28-2016, 10:15 AM   #198
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Murf2 View Post
I am one of those considering a $30 per month HMO. Of course, I am keeping my income at the minimum.

Like you, I am very concerned about the quality of care. I have some heart issues. About 150K worth last year but I had a 4K OOP max, thank God.

I spent a lot of time comparing plans last night. In my case all of my doctors are in the HMO that are in my current PPO. Both plans are BCBS.

Like you, I am very wary of the change. BCBS dropped PPO in my area. I had great luck with BCBS so far. I don't know if I want to spend 5K more a year for a higher OOP with a different carrier. The one thing I really worry about is " no out of network coverage." We are wanting to do some RV' ing.

Sorry for the ramble but you wanted to here from " us". I am very concerned as to how it will work out for us but the nearly 5K in premium savings plus a 500/100 OOP is hard not to try.

I just don't understand how the provider saves much money with a HMO with lower premiums and OOP max over a PPO with basically the same network.

Murf
I'm not sure I understand all of this, but, I think most plans will have a provision for coverage if you are traveling and can't find anyone in network.
I would love to hear from someone with more knowledge.
HadEnuff is offline  
Old 10-28-2016, 10:38 AM   #199
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
JoeWras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11,701
Quote:
Originally Posted by Looking4Ward View Post
I'm starting to see others post the cost of 2017 plans on social media and the responses many of these posts are getting are disappointing.
There's something afoot on social media regarding this. People came out of the woodwork on Nextdoor.

Appreciate the frank discussion here.
JoeWras is offline  
Old 10-28-2016, 10:54 AM   #200
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by HadEnuff View Post
I'm not sure I understand all of this, but, I think most plans will have a provision for coverage if you are traveling and can't find anyone in network.
I would love to hear from someone with more knowledge.
All plans must provide emergency care coverage, even if the provider is out of network. The policy holder is still subject to balance billing, which means the policy holder is still liable for excess charges not covered by the plan. In addition, the ER service must meet the insurer's requirements for coverage.

Any care that is "non-emergency" must be in-network and meet all other eligibility criteria. For health insurance, it is critical to understand the insurer's network of providers.
MichaelB is online now  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows 10 preview rbmrtn Other topics 13 10-07-2014 06:45 PM
Kindle Books: Preview vs. Full Version TromboneAl Other topics 9 09-09-2010 10:16 PM
Intro and Request for Advice re: My ER Preview EagleEye Hi, I am... 42 08-11-2008 01:07 PM
ER Forum Cookbook Preview TromboneAl Other topics 19 01-27-2007 01:32 PM
Tile Layout Preview Software? BigMoneyJim Other topics 2 10-28-2006 07:30 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:35 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.