|
|
Question about US vs. International Bonds
01-09-2021, 11:05 AM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,778
|
Question about US vs. International Bonds
Quick question about US vs. International Bond mix. I've got mine set at 80/20 in Vanguard. Is that about right?
Also, do you know of any good Fidelity international bond index funds? I am currently 100% in US bonds in my Fidelity account, and I think I should diversify a bit. However, last time I looked, I couldn't find any low-cost Fidelity international bond index funds. Know of any?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
01-09-2021, 11:51 AM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,184
|
AAs and US/Intl mixes need to be looked across all of your investments, not in the context of a single account.
|
|
|
01-09-2021, 12:01 PM
|
#3
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 807
|
Vanguard's target date and LifeStrategy funds allocate 40% to international in both stocks and bonds - and many Bogleheads (starting with Jack Bogle himself) vehemently-to-mildly disagree that such a large allocation to international (or any at all - especially in the case of bonds) is advisable, necessary and/or meaningful.
|
|
|
01-09-2021, 01:05 PM
|
#4
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,778
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunningBum
AAs and US/Intl mixes need to be looked across all of your investments, not in the context of a single account.
|
Yeah, I know. That's why I asked about a Fidelity account; I want to get it to 20%, too, assuming 80/20 is the right (or good enough) ratio.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevink
Vanguard's target date and LifeStrategy funds allocate 40% to international in both stocks and bonds - and many Bogleheads (starting with Jack Bogle himself) vehemently-to-mildly disagree that such a large allocation to international (or any at all - especially in the case of bonds) is advisable, necessary and/or meaningful.
|
Well, 20% is halfway between nothing and 40%, so maybe that's good. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
|
|
01-09-2021, 01:58 PM
|
#5
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,184
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ER Eddie
Yeah, I know. That's why I asked about a Fidelity account; I want to get it to 20%, too, assuming 80/20 is the right (or good enough) ratio.
|
Just buy more international bonds at Vanguard until you have 20% overall.
|
|
|
01-09-2021, 04:12 PM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,778
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunningBum
Just buy more international bonds at Vanguard until you have 20% overall.
|
Yeah, I guess that's an option.
What's your opinion on the 20% international ratio? That's really my main question.
|
|
|
01-09-2021, 04:19 PM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,184
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ER Eddie
Yeah, I guess that's an option.
What's your opinion on the 20% international ratio? That's really my main question.
|
I don't have international bonds. Maybe it would be a good idea, but I don't. I remember reading somewhere that they aren't really needed. I don't recall the source and can't tell you if it was one I really trust, or if I liked it because it matched what I do. Not really helpful, sorry.
|
|
|
01-09-2021, 04:36 PM
|
#8
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,778
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunningBum
I don't have international bonds. Maybe it would be a good idea, but I don't. I remember reading somewhere that they aren't really needed. I don't recall the source and can't tell you if it was one I really trust, or if I liked it because it matched what I do. Not really helpful, sorry.
|
No problem. I have a feeling this isn't a very sexy question, because bonds are sort of boring. And who cares about international bonds? Snooze.
But wait -- did someone say international bonds weren't sexy?
|
|
|
01-09-2021, 04:56 PM
|
#9
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NC Triangle
Posts: 5,807
|
I don’t have any international bonds in my portfolio. I used to, but they’re gone. I’m following the advice of a book about bonds which advised that bonds (of any type) aren’t there for growth, rather ballast.
I don’t have any target date funds but Vanguard’s have an international bond component last I checked.
__________________
|
|
|
01-10-2021, 04:52 AM
|
#10
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,871
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunningBum
I don't have international bonds. Maybe it would be a good idea, but I don't. I remember reading somewhere that they aren't really needed. I don't recall the source and can't tell you if it was one I really trust, or if I liked it because it matched what I do. Not really helpful, sorry.
|
+1
We have ex-US exposure in equities, but not bonds.
|
|
|
01-10-2021, 05:53 AM
|
#11
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,778
|
So, that's 3 out of 3 people saying they have no international bonds at all, and they don't see the value in owning them. Interesting. I thought there might be some benefit in terms of reducing volatility (e.g., if the US bond market tanked, maybe the international bond market would fare better). But I guess not.
Maybe I'll just stick to what I've got (20% in Vanguard, none in Fidelity) and not worry about it.
|
|
|
01-10-2021, 05:55 AM
|
#13
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,778
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markola
|
Yeah, I think it was from Vanguard's auto-advice robot that I got the original idea of a 20% allocation to international bonds.
People here (at least the three expressing an opinion) seem to believe that's not necessary. I'd be curious as to why, if anyone cares to explain the rationale.
|
|
|
01-10-2021, 06:27 AM
|
#14
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,871
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ER Eddie
Yeah, I think it was from Vanguard's auto-advice robot that I got the original idea of a 20% allocation to international bonds.
People here (at least the three expressing an opinion) seem to believe that's not necessary. I'd be curious as to why, if anyone cares to explain the rationale.
|
I'm just not aware of any potential benefit. I don't view bonds as a money-maker, but rather a ballast. If they do a little better than inflation, I'll be happy.
I'm also not saying there's anything wrong w/ ex-US bonds. If you think allocating 20-30% is a good idea, go for it.
ETA: if you do purchase ex-US bonds, I suggest some kind of low cost index, not something managed.
|
|
|
Question about US vs. International Bonds
01-10-2021, 07:59 AM
|
#15
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 3,927
|
Question about US vs. International Bonds
Quote:
Originally Posted by ER Eddie
Yeah, I think it was from Vanguard's auto-advice robot that I got the original idea of a 20% allocation to international bonds.
People here (at least the three expressing an opinion) seem to believe that's not necessary. I'd be curious as to why, if anyone cares to explain the rationale.
|
To pursuade me toward home bias, they’d also need to explain away Vanguard’s research. That’s been easy to do in hindsight over the last ten years but what about the next ten? Historically, the domestic vs. international performance pendulum reverses about every five years, which brings up the principle of reversion to mean. YMMV.
|
|
|
01-10-2021, 08:31 AM
|
#16
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NC Triangle
Posts: 5,807
|
I referred to the book about bonds and its comment about international bonds. Here’s the quote from it:
Quote:
The argument against investing in these is that they don’t offer anything beyond the rich choices that already exist in the U.S. bond markets. Worse, investors are not compensated for the currency rate risks which are introduced. The argument in favor of these is that they help investors diversify by spreading interest rate and economic risk across the globe. I’m not an expert about this, but I am not even tempted.
|
I’m even less of an expert (much less!) but it makes sense to me given what I think the role that bonds play is in my retirement portfolio.
The book is Why Bother With Bonds? by Rick Van Ness.
__________________
|
|
|
01-10-2021, 08:35 AM
|
#17
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,184
|
I'm not trying to persuade anyone, but I do appreciate when my choices are challenged, because I might learn I should be doing something different. I am not an expert on bonds by any means. In fact, I have a lot more of my non-equity holdings in TIPS right now than bonds.
Comparing VBATX (Total Intl Bond Index) with VBTLX (Total US Bond index), VBTLX has lower expenses (0.05% to 0.11%) and a higher 30 day yield (1.11% to 0,18%). Clear favor of the US fund. Maybe the yield difference is just a temporary thing, but the expenses are not.
Do Intl bonds get taxed by their countries as Total Intl Stock (VTIAX) does? You can get this back with a Foreign Tax credit, but I'm about $3000 behind on that so far. I keep bonds in my tIRA, and you can't take FTC in an IRA, so the foreign taxes are an additional drag on an intl bond fund.
That's my reasoning. Tell me where it falls short.
btw, I'm not a fan of Bond Index funds either. With stock index funds, you hold the most shares in the most successful companies. With bond index funds, it seems like you would hold more bonds from companies that need to borrow money. That doesn't seem like a good idea. That may be an oversimplified view that doesn't hold up, and again this is not a strong area for me. I'd like to hear contrasting views on bond index funds as well.
|
|
|
01-10-2021, 10:12 AM
|
#18
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,622
|
If you search "Marotta Gone Fishing", you can enter your age and portfolio size, and get a recommended AA with specific fund choices depending on whether you choose Schwab, Fidelity or Vanguard. Not saying that the AA is perfect for anyone (probably fine, but that's a different discussion). The point is that this guy takes expense ratios very seriously, so when he puts a specific fund in there, you'd probably be hard pressed to find a cheaper alternative.
I've not looked there in a while, but I think his ratio is 50/50 domestic/int'l bonds.
|
|
|
01-10-2021, 10:23 AM
|
#19
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Posts: 37,931
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunningBum
I don't have international bonds. Maybe it would be a good idea, but I don't. I remember reading somewhere that they aren't really needed. I don't recall the source and can't tell you if it was one I really trust, or if I liked it because it matched what I do. Not really helpful, sorry.
|
I don’t have international bonds either. If someone was trying to diversify away from the US govt/economy it would make sense to hold international stocks and bonds. I just have a small allocation to international equities. I’m OK for being aligned with US $ for my fixed income.
__________________
Retired since summer 1999.
|
|
|
01-10-2021, 10:24 AM
|
#20
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: City
Posts: 10,308
|
We have no international bonds though we are firm believers in diversifying equities internationally. Without studying the market in detail, my sense is that although currency risk is priced into various countries' bond yields there is not a compelling reason to hold them. If the pricing is accurate, then the residual interest rate will be closer to US bonds. If it is hedged, then the yields might even be losers due to the cost of hedging. If the pricing of the currency risk is, well, risky then why would I hold them in the supposedly-conservative side of my AA?
I could be wrong on this. I would be interested in books or links that argue against US home country bias in bond holdings.
__________________
Ignoramus et ignorabimus
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|