Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-27-2008, 08:19 PM   #21
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,505
You just want to apply the most restrictive number to the item you are trying to rebalance
That's the key.

One thing to keep in mind (and an easy source of confusion) is that the 5% rule is just 5 points or 'counts' of movement - the 25% rule is a 25% change in balance.

5 points is going from 10 to 15, or from 80 to 85. But 10 to 15 is a 50% change, and 80 to 85 is a 6.25% change. So for the change from 10 to 15, would have already exceeded the 25% rule, the 80 to 85 change is just touching the 5 point rule.

So, the 5% (points) rule will be the most restrictive for funds with allocations larger than 20%, and the 25% (movement) rule kicks in for funds with allocations less than 20%. Because 25% movement on a fund allocated at 20% is 5% or 5 'counts'. So that is the point where the rules meet.

I think he is just trying to weight things to their size and use just two numbers, not an equation.

So, 5 points of change, or a 25% change, whichever comes first.

Clear as mud?

ERD50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 06-27-2008, 11:27 PM   #22
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
DblDoc's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,224
There is a thread over at Bogleheads on this topic that may interest some. Bogleheads :: View topic - Bogle's View: Limited Value of Rebalancing

FWIW I use the 5%/25% rules to target new money to the lagards. My take on the various strategies whether it is bands or time of year or annual vs every 2-3 yrs is that it doesn't really matter alot. It is not about increased return either (it can but only by a small amount), its greatest benefit is in maintaining your AA and therefore your level of risk.

DblDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2008, 04:31 AM   #23
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,072
Unless you think your basic investment approach is flawed and needs adjustment... stick with the plan! I am assuming your planned allocations are sound.

I intend to rebalance as normal to the targets. If I am heavy in bonds... then I will be buying stock... the market rebound will occur. Of course, I am still in the accumulation phase. If I were in the distribution phase my approach will be a bit different. I would rebalance, but only if I were able to preserve a certain number of years of living expenses in fixed securities (e.g., 7 years).
chinaco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2008, 06:57 AM   #24
Recycles dryer sheets
bigla's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mt. Pleasant
Posts: 141
Some points to clarify for my situation. I have no new money going in as I am FIRE'd. As mentioned, I rarely have had to rebalnce the AA except when I had to take money out to supplement our pensions. So other than that, rebalancing will always be market driven. As I have gleaned from the posts, some will rebalance frequently, even when the market is in turmoil and there are many dips and jumps. Others wait for particular calendar times to do the job, and Mr Bogle says it doesn't matter. I'm just trying to find my own path with the help of your input.
Retired early and loving it.
bigla is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some rebalancing advice please joesxm3 FIRE and Money 9 01-24-2008 11:25 AM
Rebalancing necessary?? Hillbilly FIRE and Money 38 06-08-2007 06:27 PM
Rebalancing mickeyd FIRE and Money 0 02-22-2006 10:15 AM
Rebalancing Jerry235 FIRE and Money 5 09-08-2005 08:37 AM
Rebalancing? dory36 FIRE and Money 2 10-02-2002 04:50 AM

» Quick Links

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:40 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.