stephenson
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2009
- Messages
- 1,610
Hi All,
We have a few single family houses in the same area in northwest Florida. No mortgages.
They are all about 10 miles inland from the Gulf of Mexico, all were built in 1995-1997, all are brick/vinyl, slab on grade with attached garage and composite/fiberglas shingles. There are no trees around them, and they are all “imbedded” in neighborhoods of like size and construction.
None have ever sustained more damage in a major hurricane event than the loss of a piece of aluminum facia covering. None have ever flooded - and, there have been 100 year flood events at least twice. When I say major, think 100 mph with the eye wall going over the neighborhoods.
I do my own work on the houses (painting, repairs, etc), and they are managed by a professional company that inspects and photographs, inside and out, the houses every six months. We drive by and keep and eye on them relatively often.
I have noted over the years, the cost of full insurance for each has increased - substantially - with the insurance companies becoming increasingly invasive about the age of everything they might be required to cover. The hurricane deductibles alone are approaching 30% of the cost of a new roof.
We also maintain a $3M umbrella policy.
So, I am at the point where I would consider other options which entail greater property risk, but maintain good liability coverage. I have bids from a couple of insurance companies for liability only coverage on the properties - for $1M on each, the cost is $100 per property - the current full coverage is approaching $2000 per year. I have reviewed options with competitor companies and some are much higher than the $2000. Liability only coverage is about the same.
I recognize the risk of loss of property, but the damage insurance cost factors are getting out of control.
Thoughts and advice?
We have a few single family houses in the same area in northwest Florida. No mortgages.
They are all about 10 miles inland from the Gulf of Mexico, all were built in 1995-1997, all are brick/vinyl, slab on grade with attached garage and composite/fiberglas shingles. There are no trees around them, and they are all “imbedded” in neighborhoods of like size and construction.
None have ever sustained more damage in a major hurricane event than the loss of a piece of aluminum facia covering. None have ever flooded - and, there have been 100 year flood events at least twice. When I say major, think 100 mph with the eye wall going over the neighborhoods.
I do my own work on the houses (painting, repairs, etc), and they are managed by a professional company that inspects and photographs, inside and out, the houses every six months. We drive by and keep and eye on them relatively often.
I have noted over the years, the cost of full insurance for each has increased - substantially - with the insurance companies becoming increasingly invasive about the age of everything they might be required to cover. The hurricane deductibles alone are approaching 30% of the cost of a new roof.
We also maintain a $3M umbrella policy.
So, I am at the point where I would consider other options which entail greater property risk, but maintain good liability coverage. I have bids from a couple of insurance companies for liability only coverage on the properties - for $1M on each, the cost is $100 per property - the current full coverage is approaching $2000 per year. I have reviewed options with competitor companies and some are much higher than the $2000. Liability only coverage is about the same.
I recognize the risk of loss of property, but the damage insurance cost factors are getting out of control.
Thoughts and advice?