 |
Retirement Housing Rent vs Buy and Inflation
07-03-2017, 03:57 PM
|
#1
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Dublin
Posts: 80
|
Retirement Housing Rent vs Buy and Inflation
Both my wife and I plan to retire this year. We would like to sell our house and either rent an apartment or purchase a Condo with a master suite and laundry on the first floor that would be better to age in.
Initially we would likely move to Wisconsin to be close to our grandchildren but in today's mobile society who knows what the future will bring so advantage renting.
However, I feel that buying gives us more protection should inflation rear it's ugly head. It also offers the opportunity for a home owner's line of credit or reverse mortgage if they are ever needed so in that case advantage buying.
I am not at all clear which option is best and would be interested in any comments the esteemed readers of this forum would like to offer.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
|
|
|
 |
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
07-03-2017, 04:01 PM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bikechuck
Both my wife and I plan to retire this year. We would like to sell our house and either rent an apartment or purchase a Condo with a master suite and laundry on the first floor that would be better to age in.
Initially we would likely move to Wisconsin to be close to our grandchildren but in today's mobile society who knows what the future will bring so advantage renting.
However, I feel that buying gives us more protection should inflation rear it's ugly head. It also offers the opportunity for a home owner's line of credit or reverse mortgage if they are ever needed so in that case advantage buying.
I am not at all clear which option is best and would be interested in any comments the esteemed readers of this forum would like to offer.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
|
All the things you mention are real. I believe there may not be a single "best" answer.
Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
|
|
|
07-03-2017, 04:12 PM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,743
|
There has been numerous discussions on this subject if you search this topic.
Rent provides more flexibility and mobility so there are lots of non financial reasons to factor in the decision.
This calculator can make the financial decision easier for you.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...alculator.html
|
|
|
07-03-2017, 04:14 PM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Flyover country
Posts: 22,978
|
Yes, it can be a dilemma and what works best for one person might be awful for another.
One thing to keep in mind though:
If you're planning to buy and you want that HELOC, many people have said it's much easier to do that before you retire rather than after.
__________________
I thought growing old would take longer.
|
|
|
07-03-2017, 04:16 PM
|
#5
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The 850
Posts: 853
|
Random thoughts from a guy who hates cold weather and has no grandchildren....
-moving to a smaller space will simplify your lives over time. less maintenance, easier to keep clean, etc. Lots of things will be tossed or find new owners, and maybe your kids will claim some of the things you've been storing for them
-If you move to WI, rent and see how it goes. Any prospective gains as an inflation hedge could get wiped out by transaction costs if you sell in a couple years because SIL has a new job somewhere else. You might not like daily life there over the course of a year and decide it's better to be a frequent visitor.
-A reverse will only get you a portion of your net equity. If you buy, I would give serious consideration to putting down the minimum amount to get your payment at a comfortable level and bank the rest - fund your own reverse, basically. Paying cash for a house with the idea you can get a reverse later is bad financial math - costs of the reverse can be 5% of the value, and the amount you receive is no more than 80% of your equity
-If you move south, you'll have more cycling days and they will surely come to see you in February
__________________
Stay at home slacker dad since 2015
|
|
|
07-03-2017, 04:30 PM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,804
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corporateburnout
There has been numerous discussions on this subject if you search this topic.
Rent provides more flexibility and mobility than buy so there are lots of non financial reasons to factor in the decision.
This calculator can make the financial decision easier for you.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...alculator.html
|
+1 for the NYT rent/buy tool.
It's a very complex question that deals with both financial and non-financial variables, which vary significantly by region and individual. There is no way to generalize. The NYT tool is the best I've seen for analyzing at least the financial part of the equation. It's not only a very comprehensive analysis, but it also explains each variable and makes it very easy to see how sensitive the answer is to each variable. For example, OP can test his theory about high inflation favoring buying.
__________________
Retired at 52 in July 2013. On to better things...
AA: 55% stock, 15% real estate, 27% bonds, 3% cash
WR: 2.7% SI: 2 pensions, some rental income, SS later
|
|
|
07-03-2017, 04:41 PM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2006
Location: west coast, hi there!
Posts: 8,543
|
I was surprised to read that inflation has averaged 4.1% over the last 50 years. I checked and that figure is correct.
Who knows if it will heat up again.
One could perhaps rent and then hedge possible inflation. Maybe equities, TIPS, etc.
|
|
|
07-03-2017, 06:16 PM
|
#8
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Dublin
Posts: 80
|
Thanks for the comments so far, it is helpful to read them. Please keep them coming as multiple perspectives are useful.
|
|
|
07-03-2017, 06:27 PM
|
#9
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,906
|
You may want to look beyond the financial reasons. Ownership provides a certain freedom. As a retiree the last thing I want are adjacent neighbors, anyone bothering me as inlandlords, HOA's ETC. If I can't afford to live my desired lifestyle I'm not really FIRE'd. Your perspective may be different.
__________________
Took SS at 62 and hope I live long enough to regret the decision.
|
|
|
07-03-2017, 07:04 PM
|
#10
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Huntsville, AL/Helen, GA
Posts: 6,002
|
I worked for a Wisconsin megacompany, and most of my co-workers lived in Illinois to avoid paying enormous Wisconsin property taxes. And their Illinois property taxes were also too high.
This may sound like an exaggeration, but if my home was in Wisconsin, the property taxes would be higher than my total cost of housing in low tax Alabama--if I had a mortgage.
Wisconsin may be a better place to rent part year--and go to the Deep South for Winter. Their Winter weather is just terrible, and cabin fever is real.
|
|
|
07-03-2017, 07:17 PM
|
#11
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Santa Paula
Posts: 3,965
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxfirev5
You may want to look beyond the financial reasons. Ownership provides a certain freedom. As a retiree the last thing I want are adjacent neighbors, anyone bothering me as in landlords, HOA's ETC. If I can't afford to live my desired lifestyle I'm not really FIRE'd. Your perspective may be different.
|
I agree. we bought a new manufactured home in a + 55 senior park that suits our lifestyle. Space rent is controlled by the city, and it tied to the CPI. There is a certain peace of mind in owning the place free and clear. Yes, there are rules in the park, but they are not onerous.
Having lived in a condo for 25 years with an HOA, there is little comparison.
YMMV
__________________
Retired Jan 2009 Have not looked back.
AA 60/35/5 considering SS and pensions a SP annuity
WR 2% with 2SS & 2 Pensions
|
|
|
07-03-2017, 07:53 PM
|
#12
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlaGator
Random thoughts from a guy who hates cold weather and has no grandchildren....
-moving to a smaller space will simplify your lives over time. less maintenance, easier to keep clean, etc. Lots of things will be tossed or find new owners, and maybe your kids will claim some of the things you've been storing for them
-If you move to WI, rent and see how it goes. Any prospective gains as an inflation hedge could get wiped out by transaction costs if you sell in a couple years because SIL has a new job somewhere else. You might not like daily life there over the course of a year and decide it's better to be a frequent visitor.
-A reverse will only get you a portion of your net equity. If you buy, I would give serious consideration to putting down the minimum amount to get your payment at a comfortable level and bank the rest - fund your own reverse, basically. Paying cash for a house with the idea you can get a reverse later is bad financial math - costs of the reverse can be 5% of the value, and the amount you receive is no more than 80% of your equity
-If you move south, you'll have more cycling days and they will surely come to see you in February 
|
A lot of wise counsel.
Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
|
|
|
07-03-2017, 08:23 PM
|
#13
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,740
|
One big problem with reverse mortgages is that only the original owners can live in the home, you can't vacate and rent it out. When our family member could no longer live alone, we were forced by the bank to put the house on the market during the worst real estate market in 50 years (2008). Would have preferred renting it out and waiting out the storm. But, no. Due to sky high FHA appraisal, home sat on the market for a year, then was foreclosed on. Bank finally sold it after 3 years for about 30% less than appraisal. Terrible waste of a once proud family home.
|
|
|
 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|