|
|
Retirement Planning Software Recommendations?
03-11-2008, 03:28 PM
|
#1
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,204
|
Retirement Planning Software Recommendations?
I'm a numbers guy, so I like the details. I have looked at and passed on a few, I did buy Real World Retirement about 5 years ago and it's a decent basic package. But as I get closer to actually retiring (2-4 years?) I'd like something better/more detailed. Just thought I'd ask for first hand recommendations, what better place than here?
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57
Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
03-11-2008, 03:58 PM
|
#2
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lake Livingston, Tx
Posts: 4,203
|
I think you will find most here use spread sheets they have created and FIRECALC.
|
|
|
03-12-2008, 10:09 PM
|
#3
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,856
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack
Just thought I'd ask for first hand recommendations, what better place than here?
|
I'd say that you could run conventional FIRECalc, Monte-Carlo FIRECalc, and FinancialEngines.com.
Beyond that you're just indulging your passion for data entry.
__________________
*
Co-author (with my daughter) of “Raising Your Money-Savvy Family For Next Generation Financial Independence.”
Author of the book written on E-R.org: "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement."
I don't spend much time here— please send a PM.
|
|
|
03-13-2008, 07:21 AM
|
#4
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 133
|
I've used ESPlanner for years, but as far as online calculators, my favorite is:
Online Monte Carlo Retirement Planner
|
|
|
03-13-2008, 04:19 PM
|
#5
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,204
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hogwild
|
I enjoyed playing with that, thanks for the link. I am leaning toward buying ESPlanner too. For my money, more than worth $199 to have more info.
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57
Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
|
|
|
03-13-2008, 06:53 PM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,020
|
Just got ESPlanner... confusing as all get-out. I'm going to walk through the tutorial to see if that helps.
|
|
|
06-08-2008, 08:52 AM
|
#7
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 146
|
So what do you think of E$planner?
__________________
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of misery.
Winston Churchill
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 07:39 AM
|
#9
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 987
|
I'm glad this thread was "reactivated" since I was about to start a new one on the subject, related to E$Planner.
After reading comments on the related book "Spend till the End", I started looking again on the E$Planner site.
The "situation" for me is that I'm retired (age 60) and no longer making contribtutions to any retirement plan. I/DW are at a time in life that we have no financial obligations (house/cars/CC all paid off). My DW, while still employed, expects to retire in the next year (not yet "emotionally ready").
Anyway, using the financial forecast tools at our disposal (FIRECalc, Vanguard's F.E., Fidelity's RIP - full version) along with our "annual checkup" provided by both Vanguard and Fidelity (with their representatives), show that we will have more than enough to "live the life we have become accustomed" till our plan age of 100. In fact, F.E. shows us "much better than needed" since you cannot plug in a "date of passing". It uses established tables that show that we could be spending (if we would wish) much more than we are.
While the $199 price of E$Planner (download, Plus version) is not a problem to me (OK, it is! I'm "frugal" - no actually I'm "cheap" ), I question the possible "value" to me.
If it says I don't have enough to retire, it dosen't matter (I'm already retired). The "impacts to retirement" (per the web site review) don't apply. No education costs to consider, no "next generation" to worry about, no mortgage or other debt.
The only thing it could possibly tell me is that I could spend more (as F.E. is telling me, today). Even if I felt confident spending more, I probably would not (hey, I'm happy - that's all that counts, isn't it?)
What am I missing? Please feel to contribute your comments.
- Ron
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 08:52 AM
|
#10
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nords
Beyond that you're just indulging your passion for data entry.
|
I think theres a few months of eye rubbing and disbelief over whether you can really get away with retiring thats salved by having a bunch of miniature oracles tell you that yes, you really can do it.
Past having at least 25x your regular budget invested, a decent asset allocation, the willingness to spend reasonably, avoid taking on too little or too much risk, and that whole agile/mobile/hostile thing...the rest is just mathematical masturbation.
Monte Carlo's often throw off numbers that are too conservative or too liberal. Much of the time they lack the correlative factors. Firecalc-type historic data planners rely on the past actions of asset classes performing similarly in the future, when they may in fact do no such thing. Your budget may take wild changes in response to inflation, health care issues, unexpected events and major changes. You have no idea what your actual life span will be.
Best tools I came away with from having analyzed the analyzers is to be prudent and improvise where needed.
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 08:53 AM
|
#11
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fort Collins
Posts: 194
|
I agree with Nords. I have tried several on-line calculators but the two I have relied on the most are FIRECalc and Financial Engines.
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 09:00 AM
|
#12
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake46
I agree with Nords. I have tried several on-line calculators but the two I have relied on the most are FIRECalc and Financial Engines.
|
Same here.
I'm beginning to wonder if we were separated at birth...
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 09:17 AM
|
#13
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fort Collins
Posts: 194
|
REWahoo,
I was told I was born in Tulsa, Oklahoma, of course that's just hearsay!
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 09:29 AM
|
#14
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,004
|
Jake, 250 miles south of Tulsa for me, or so I was told...
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 10:02 AM
|
#15
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 69
|
I do am reading Spend Til The End and am thinking about ESPlanner, mostly as a check. I am about to pull the trigger and think that I have covered all of my bases, but just want another confirmation. I too am a numbers person, and am always looking for affirmation that the decision is correct. Do any of the users feel that it offered them something they were unable to get from other online calculators? One thing that I see it does is deal with taxes on an actual year by year basis, instead of the broad brush x% that I currently use in my spreadsheets. Are there other benefits?
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 11:21 AM
|
#16
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,204
|
I probably shouldn't comment yet as I just finished Spend til The End on Saturday and bought (I was leaning toward buying it anyway) ESPlanner Plus on Sunday. I have plugged in all my numbers, although some are estimates that need to be tweaked. The first 'consumption smoothing' result said we could save much less and afford to spend 61% more in real dollars than our current expense budget!!! I have no intention of increasing spending at all, but it's reassuring nonetheless. As I said in my original post, I am a numbers guy (Engineer) so I want the details. I have developed a pretty elaborate spreadsheet over the years that I am pretty proud of, although there are others here undoubtedly more talented. After reading STTE, I concluded that I may never reach the point I can play with as many variables with my own spreadsheet as I can with ESPlanner Plus. More sophisticated treatment of fed & state taxes, ease of varying annuities (I don't plan to buy one), Monte Carlo integrated, etc. let's me see any combination of assumptions I might want. So $199 is a bargain IMHO.
For the poster who is already retired, I wouldn't see much benefit. I am at least 2 years from RE, so I wanted another 'double check.' I realize there are too many uncertainties for anything to predict long term success greater than about 80% (W Bernstein), but I'd rather have a solid plan based on conservative assumptions and contingencies built it, before I pull the trigger.
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57
Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 08:23 PM
|
#17
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 798
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack
I probably shouldn't comment yet as I just finished Spend til The End on Saturday and bought (I was leaning toward buying it anyway) ESPlanner Plus on Sunday. I have plugged in all my numbers, although some are estimates that need to be tweaked. The first 'consumption smoothing' result said we could save much less and afford to spend 61% more in real dollars than our current expense budget!!! I have no intention of increasing spending at all, but it's reassuring nonetheless. As I said in my original post, I am a numbers guy (Engineer) so I want the details. I have developed a pretty elaborate spreadsheet over the years that I am pretty proud of, although there are others here undoubtedly more talented. After reading STTE, I concluded that I may never reach the point I can play with as many variables with my own spreadsheet as I can with ESPlanner Plus. More sophisticated treatment of fed & state taxes, ease of varying annuities (I don't plan to buy one), Monte Carlo integrated, etc. let's me see any combination of assumptions I might want. So $199 is a bargain IMHO.
For the poster who is already retired, I wouldn't see much benefit. I am at least 2 years from RE, so I wanted another 'double check.' I realize there are too many uncertainties for anything to predict long term success greater than about 80% (W Bernstein), but I'd rather have a solid plan based on conservative assumptions and contingencies built it, before I pull the trigger.
|
Let us know how ESPlanner Plus checks out. It sounds interesting at $199.
|
|
|
06-10-2008, 06:18 AM
|
#18
|
Dryer sheet wannabe
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 12
|
ESPlanner for retirees
Unlike Midpack, I can see large benefits in using ESPlanner for those who are already retired, particularly those in their 50's, 60's, and early 70's.
Here are some of the questions it can help answer.
- When should I take SS?
- If I took SS early was that a mistake, and would I be better off withdrawing and re-applying or suspending?
- How should my spouse and I time our taking of our SS benefits?
- Should I take out a reverse mortgage?
- Should I downsize, or downsize and rent?
- Should I gift now and over time, or bequest at death?
- What's the best way to make charitable contributions?
- What are the risk/reward trade-offs to my living standard of different portfolio asset allocations?
- Should I invest at least some of the retirement portfolio in real life income annuities? (Hint the answer here is almost always yes, unless your health is very poor.)
- What is the survivorship status of either surviving spouse when the partner dies?
Robert K
|
|
|
06-10-2008, 08:06 AM
|
#19
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 798
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert8
Unlike Midpack, I can see large benefits in using ESPlanner for those who are already retired, particularly those in their 50's, 60's, and early 70's.
Here are some of the questions it can help answer.
- When should I take SS?
- If I took SS early was that a mistake, and would I be better off withdrawing and re-applying or suspending?
- How should my spouse and I time our taking of our SS benefits?
- Should I take out a reverse mortgage?
- Should I downsize, or downsize and rent?
- Should I gift now and over time, or bequest at death?
- What's the best way to make charitable contributions?
- What are the risk/reward trade-offs to my living standard of different portfolio asset allocations?
- Should I invest at least some of the retirement portfolio in real life income annuities? (Hint the answer here is almost always yes, unless your health is very poor.)
- What is the survivorship status of either surviving spouse when the partner dies?
Robert K
|
They'll never sell another copy now!
|
|
|
06-10-2008, 11:38 AM
|
#20
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,506
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert8
Unlike Midpack, I can see large benefits in using ESPlanner for those who are already retired, particularly those in their 50's, 60's, and early 70's.
Here are some of the questions it can help answer.
- When should I take SS?
- If I took SS early was that a mistake, and would I be better off withdrawing and re-applying or suspending?
- How should my spouse and I time our taking of our SS benefits?
- Should I take out a reverse mortgage?
- Should I downsize, or downsize and rent?
- Should I gift now and over time, or bequest at death?
- What's the best way to make charitable contributions?
- What are the risk/reward trade-offs to my living standard of different portfolio asset allocations?
- Should I invest at least some of the retirement portfolio in real life income annuities? (Hint the answer here is almost always yes, unless your health is very poor.)
- What is the survivorship status of either surviving spouse when the partner dies?
Robert K
|
I have used ESPlanner for a couple of years now, and agree with your comments. I think it is extremely useful to see how different choices could affect your "relative" standard of living. I do not use their absolute values because of the points I make in my post below. Please see comments on ESPlanner here
http://www.early-retirement.org/foru...8&postcount=10
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|