|
|
08-26-2020, 10:40 AM
|
#61
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,613
|
Back in 2017 I predicted it would be enough for two lattes at Starbucks (message #39). I got $25+ - should cover those 2 lattes and maybe something decadent from their bakery.
- Rita
__________________
Only got A dimple, would have preferred 2!
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
08-26-2020, 10:48 AM
|
#62
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,022
|
Looks like the payout was $8.34 per call. The more they bugged you, the more you got.
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
08-27-2020, 05:01 PM
|
#63
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 770
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11522914
I recently got a settlement check for $8.34. I don't even remember what is was for.
But it made me think of what happened to that $300 spam settlement.
Now I know. Looking forward to my $50 bucks. [emoji16][emoji16]
|
I guess the $8.34 was my spam call check.
Oh well, on to filling out the Google claim I just received.
__________________
you interpret daily life according to your ideas of what is possible or not possible - Seth Speaks
|
|
|
08-28-2020, 04:06 AM
|
#64
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 6,181
|
I had forgotten about this. I received a check for $25 and change. Not going to complain about it.
__________________
FIREd date: June 26, 2018 - "This Happy Feeling, Going Round and Round!" (GQ)
|
|
|
05-01-2021, 08:54 PM
|
#65
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas: No Country for Old Men
Posts: 50,022
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by REWahoo
Three years after starting this thread I received a settlement check. While it wasn't the hyped up $300 amount, it was more than the earlier report of $22.
Probably the only time in my life I'll get any monetary compensation for the thousand of spam calls to my phone.
|
Today, eight months after getting a settlement check for $50, I received another check - this time for $2.50. The class action settlement that keeps on paying.
__________________
Numbers is hard
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 12:07 PM
|
#66
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 465
|
Yup, us too! First check was less than $10, but we also got another one yesterday for $2.50.
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 12:30 PM
|
#67
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 267
|
Interesting. We never received a first check but got one yesterday for $2.50.
We have vivid memories of many, many of these calls, so I wonder if we were awarded a first check but never received it? Anyone know how/if I could check on this? To think we submitted all that 'proof' for a whopping $2.50 is really annoying. Can't even get one Starbucks Frappuccino for that!
ETA: I was wrong. We did get a first check for $8.34 back in August. I thought that was for another class action case but it was actually for this one.
|
|
|
05-02-2021, 12:40 PM
|
#68
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 465
|
We actually submitted two claims, one for my wife's cell phone and one for our landline. We only received settlement checks for her cell.
I looked yesterday to see if there was a way to check on the status of the other claim, but I couldn't find a link that allows you to enter specific claim number.
|
|
|
05-04-2021, 01:08 PM
|
#69
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 6,181
|
Received 2nd settlement check for $2.50. Now I have to decide what to do with these new found riches.
__________________
FIREd date: June 26, 2018 - "This Happy Feeling, Going Round and Round!" (GQ)
|
|
|
06-05-2021, 11:07 AM
|
#70
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Portland
Posts: 321
|
Just saw an online article about Robo Revenge. Sounds like it's different from the class action suit mentioned in this post. You sign up for their app, they give you a fake credit card # to use, then when you respond they capture the spammer's info which you then use to sue them in small claims court.
Has anyone here used the app, or gone so far as to file a claim in small claims?
|
|
|
Robocall class action lawsuit - potential $300 per call payout
06-06-2021, 06:39 PM
|
#71
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Southern UT
Posts: 374
|
Robocall class action lawsuit - potential $300 per call payout
I haven’t but oh I’d like to. I consider myself a relatively gentle soul but when spammers use my phone more than I do for calls, it really irks.
What does one actually sue for in small claims court?
I’d have to think more about how to defend myself In deliberately providing a fake credit card....
__________________
"Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." Emily Dickinson
|
|
|
06-07-2021, 06:43 AM
|
#72
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,931
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueskyk
I’d have to think more about how to defend myself In deliberately providing a fake credit card....
|
Seriously? You're worried that the law breaking scammer is going to sue you for giving a fake credit card number?
To put your mind at ease, it's not a fake credit card number, it's a real virtual number set up by and owned by DoNotPay and you've been authorized to use it.
Scammer taking the credit card number has no idea where the credit card number came from, doesn't even know it was generated by DoNotPay. All they know is when they attempted to use it that the charge was denied.
Quote:
What does one actually sue for in small claims court?
|
Here are all the details...
https://donotpay.com/learn/report-robocall/
|
|
|
Robocall class action lawsuit - potential $300 per call payout
06-07-2021, 03:56 PM
|
#73
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Southern UT
Posts: 374
|
Robocall class action lawsuit - potential $300 per call payout
Njhowie - thanks for the clarification and the additional information. I have no worries about scammers suing me, just wanted to be sure my own actions would be legit.
I took a quick look at the link your provided and my first impression is that since only SOME robocalls are illegal I would have to actually engage with them all to find the few that fit in that category....and I don’t think I want to spend the time to do that.
I guess I’m not irked enough to make it a part time job!
__________________
"Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." Emily Dickinson
|
|
|
06-07-2021, 07:03 PM
|
#74
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,698
|
As fascinating these end-user solutions are, the best solutions are those which address the sources and enablers of these robocalls - the phone companies.
I recall watching on C-Span in the last few years some hearings about these robocallers and phone scammers. The phone companies have fairly easy ways to determine if there are many, many calls frequently originating from a single source (and a source not part of a legit exception, such as informational robocalls from local municipalities such as villages, counties, school districts; or medically based from doctor offices and pharmacies), making it evident that they are up to no good. The phone companies can and should shut them down.
Call number spoofing over the years has really juiced up the spamming because it can evade call-blocking programs. The phone companies, again, can stop this by preventing the caller from assigning a number to its call which differs from the actual number they are using. Yes, there are legit (and narrow) exceptions to this such as doctor's office which has multiple lines, and they want to have their main number appearing on the recipient's caller-ID; or from a battered women's shelter trying to conceal the presence of an estranged spouse. As long as the scammers can't obtain one of these exceptions, the number-spoofing can be prevented.
IMHO it's the source which should be used to put these spammers and scammers out of business.
__________________
Retired in late 2008 at age 45. Cashed in company stock, bought a lot of shares in a big bond fund and am living nicely off its dividends. IRA, SS, and a pension await me at age 60 and later. No kids, no debts.
"I want my money working for me instead of me working for my money!"
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|