wildcat said:
I think we all know the traditional order of putting our money to use. In other words, if a person has credit card debt @ 20% then he/she should pay that off first. New scenario for me...
Suppose (as most of us expect) stock market returns remain moderate to low. Suppose a person has quite a bit of student loans and/or other low interest debt. If neither one is a clear cut best place to put money to work what should I do?
Any suggestions with before and after tax money? Should I accumulate and then pay off student loan debt more aggressively when I get closer to a desirable retirement age?
I think Roth IRA is a sure thing but beyond that I am not sure what to do....keep in mind I am pretty young. Thanks as always.
This is like the mortgage reciprocated diatribe with lower interest rates.
First, be able to sleep at night. Could you carry that "huge" debt load and still be able to sleep? Could you set aside enough emergency funds to carry the payments (whatever the rules are) if you were unemployed for six months?
Assuming those feel-good answers are "Yes", then from here on out it's all math and I'm on Justin's side of the debate. If you can get more after-tax from the market than you're paying before-tax on the debt, then pay off the debt as slowly as possible.
First exploit all tax-deferred/free investments-- especially the coveted 401(k) match. So your 401(k) should be funded up to the match, then your Roth up to its limits, and then go back for the rest of your 401(k) (assuming it's not a high-expense plan).
Then run the numbers in FIRECalc. For the first set, assume you've wiped out your portfolio to pay off all the student debt. (Just like reducing your retirement portfolio to pay off your mortgage at retirement.) See how long your (smaller) portfolio survives your withdrawals.
For the second set, assume you have your current portfolio but raise your annual withdrawals to include the payments on the student loans. This portfolio will probably have a higher survival rate just because it's bigger (able to handle longer sustained downturns) let alone the fact that you're earning more from your investments than you're paying on your loans.
The keys to surviving three decades of this scenario are (1) cash flow (hopefully from salary) to pay the student loan and (2) having a higher return on your investments than you're paying on the loan, and (3) enough time in the market to handle fluctuations. With stocks this usually requires a couple decades, but with CDs or bonds it could take a lot less time. If you're earning 4% after-tax in a CD and paying a couple percent in student loans, you will win every time.