Join Early Retirement Today
View Poll Results: How are you planning (or did you plan) to fill the SS gap?
Not planning for a “gap” because I’m not planning to get Social Security. 22 21.78%
Too far away to be thinking about this kind of detail. 4 3.96%
Explicitly earmarked assets which I plan to liquidate during the gap. 24 23.76%
Make higher withdrawals from my regular, long-term asset allocation. 25 24.75%
Make higher withdrawals from my bond funds, changing my AA. 2 1.98%
Using “bucket of money” plan, and first bucket is extra large allowing for gap. 8 7.92%
I guess it’s time to start thinking about this. 4 3.96%
Other. 12 11.88%
Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Social Security Gap
Old 05-27-2009, 09:48 AM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,628
Social Security Gap

I got some interesting replies on the “Social Security Gap” toward the end of this thread: I thought I’d turn the question into a poll.

The concept is that “early” retirees have a period when they aren’t working but aren’t getting SS benefits either. I’m guessing that most people want relatively level total income during retirement, so what provisions are they making (or did they make) for filling the gap?

Using my situation as an example: I planned for 7 years for me (59 to 66) and 8 for my wife. We have/had specific assets (primarily a CD ladder) that we expected to liquidate. This was/is in addition to our regular IRA withdrawals.

(The "bucket of money" option in the poll refers to people who plan to keep the next ___ years of spending in short term fixed assets, with the remaining spending in some long term assets like stocks.)
Independent is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 05-27-2009, 10:01 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,746
We expect to have a multi-decade gap between FIRE and SS (even if taken at 62). So the main benefit of SS is longevity insurance. If we make it the first 25-30 years w/o SS, then we will probably be fine thereafter and SS will be icing on the cake. Given the high level of unknowns as to what will happen to the system in the intervening decades, I can't really rely on receiving much from SS in terms of my planning. I think FIREcalc shows some minor benefits to SS in terms of SWR and probability of survival, so it is worth something obviously. And with a paid off house plus two SS's, we'll be living a very modest existence if the portfolio vaporizes for some reason. But not much different than many other standard age retirees.
FUEGO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 10:08 AM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Bikerdude's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,901
I had two "gaps" to fill. One from 52 until 55 when I started my pension and 55 until 62 when I will start SS. I used my "outside" money as a bridge for those gaps. I invested mainly in CD's, MM, and short term bond funds. Worked well for me.
“I guess I should warn you, if I turn out to be particularly clear, you've probably misunderstood what I've said” Alan Greenspan
Bikerdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 10:10 AM   #4
ziggy29's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
I've kicked around the idea and in the back of my mind I've been tentatively thinking about this, but there's at least a decade between now and the time we can FIRE and maybe a little more. So it's too early to have a concrete strategy; this is too much time for circumstances (and laws) to change.

But ultimately, there will need to be a pile of cash which can augment our income before SS kicks in and after I FIRE.

And changes in health care policy over the next few years will likely make a huge difference in our planning.
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 11:01 AM   #5
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 12,866
I don't include SS benefits in my retirement planning, because who knows what SS will look like in 30 years and what kind of benefits (if any) I might receive... So, when planning for retirement, I find our plan lacking guaranteed income sources (no SS, no pension, etc...). Consequently, at retirement, I plan on buying an immediate COLA'd annuity with 1/3 of our portfolio so that we have a guaranteed fixed income covering all or most of our basic expenses (food, utilities, property taxes, healthcare, etc...), the rest of our portfolio will be set up to throw a diversified stream of dividends which will pay for discretionary expenses. Any SS benefit we might receive would be gravy.
46 years old, single, no kids. Exited the job market in 2010 (age 36). Have lived solely off my investments since 2015 (age 41). No pensions.
Current AA: real estate 64% / equities 10% / fixed income 16% / cash 10%
FIREd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 11:28 AM   #6
Alan's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 30,212
I RE in January and I've built up cash to cover the 7 year gap - in I-Bonds, bank savings and CD's.

Note that I also expect to have a non-COLA pension which will cover 60% of what I plan to spend in year 1.
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
Alan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 01:13 PM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,786
I don't plan on SS being there when I get of age to claim it.
If it is, great, I get a bonus. If it isn't, I planned for that and am ready to keep going without it.
"We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.
(Ancient Indian Proverb)"
Zathras is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 01:46 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,183
I voted other and created and enjoy an income stream from the IRA via a 72T along with an after tax portfolio which will could be descimated by the time I reach SS. Downsizing the home will free up another pile o'cash which will be put into Mr Market as well. The Roth IRA and the 401K are still in the reserve category in case of emergency.
crazy connie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 03:43 PM   #9
Recycles dryer sheets
LoftyNotions's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Billings
Posts: 101
I voted other because I'll be getting a pension kicker until age 63. It's not as much as SS will be, but it's enough to make retirement possible.

We'll decide what to do about taking Social Security as we get closer to age 62 or 63 depending on what the markets and gummint do in the meantime.

LoftyNotions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 04:49 PM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 1,666
I did not plan on ever getting any SS - if I do, then great. I will continue to live on the dividend flow from my IRAs / 72t (which replaced my old net salary), grabbing whatever SS I can in 12 years before I am means-tested out of it.
learn, work, save, invest, fire
CyclingInvestor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 04:52 PM   #11
Gone but not forgotten
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sarasota,fl.
Posts: 11,447
Since I retired at 59 I did nothing since at 60 I was eligible for SS survivor benefit which will carry me until I convert to my benefit which is higher.
Moemg is offline   Reply With Quote
SS gap
Old 05-27-2009, 06:43 PM   #12
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA suburbs
Posts: 1,796
SS gap

I plan to retire in 4 years, at age 58 when I can collect my state pension. I can pay a small amount to continue my health plan until Medicare. I will collect SS survivor benefits at age 60 which will likely be higher than my own benefit amount. I can tap CDs and have bond income and a couple of annuities to augment my pension if need be. I own two paid off houses(in PA and FL). Might sell one or both when the market improves.
WhoDaresWins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 07:24 PM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 7,915
1993 - 2005 sold and ate the duplex, severance pay/ other small pile of cash, dividend stocks, one yr temp work, small pension at 55 in 98, and was a really really cheap bastard expense wise.

Started hearing footsteps post Katrina and took the early SS and some trad IRA. Before that I was bulletproof and going to live to 101 so I was putting off SS and planned to be el cheapo on IRA until 70 1/2.

heh heh heh - hope I don't spend it all before the rest of you get there. Just kidding.
unclemick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2009, 07:51 PM   #14
Recycles dryer sheets
Radiophilejapan's Avatar
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 67
I'm 58 and counting on SS at least into the first 10 or 15 years of retirement. In the longer run, who knows? Humanivorous aliens may have taken over the earth.
To fill the gap, I plan to build a ladder of CDs when interest rates go up (guessing mid next year?). Keeping cash in VG munis fund for now.
Radiophilejapan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2009, 08:21 AM   #15
Recycles dryer sheets
JonnyM's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Modesto
Posts: 334
Send a message via AIM to JonnyM Send a message via Yahoo to JonnyM
I checked other. FIRE'd at 50 leaving at least a 12 year gap. That was 3 years ago. DW is in similar situation. We differ in age only by 6 months. The plan was to not consider SS as a factor in the planning, but to be pleasantly surprised by the "raise in pay" when we become eligible. The details as to when to begin to draw and whether to play the spousal benefit game will have to wait until we get there to see what tinkering occurs in the meantime to the system.
It's about the music
JonnyM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2009, 12:51 PM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,409
Checked "not planning for gap" as I'm a federal retiree. While I am eligible to receive SS, my work history has a lot of zero income years for SS purposes. I figure I'd get about $300 a month......not enough to overly concern myself of a gap and have sufficient assets in addition to COLA'd pension. SS will be gravy, but my RE did not take it into account.

RE2Boys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2009, 12:59 PM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
bbbamI's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Collin County, TX
Posts: 9,244
Dribbles of cd's, pension and IRA. When SS time comes, it's party hardy!
There's no need to complicate, our time is short..
bbbamI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 08:45 AM   #18
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,628
Thanks for all the responses – 71 in two days. I started the poll because threads on withdrawal rates seem to ignore this issue. I wondered how many people were thinking about it. The poll results show that almost everyone who is expecting SS and close enough to ER to make a plan already has a plan.

Here are some other things I noticed:

Fewer responses in the first two categories than I expected. I thought most of the “younger” posters would pick one of them. Either we have fewer “young” posters or they are doing more long term planning than I thought.

Fewer “bucket of money” responses. Based on other threads, I thought we had more people using this strategy.

More “other”. It’s easy to forget the wide variation in situations. Thanks for the explanations.

The most interesting result is that “earmarked assets” is running dead even with “higher withdrawals from my regular, long term AA”. The wisdom behind the 4% SWR is that you need to be concerned about the risk that the poor returns during your retirement will all bunch up at the beginning. This risk is aggravated if you have to make unusually large withdrawals in the early years. Using earmarked assets (presumably very stable) should cut this risk. My guess is that people are familiar with this reasoning, but that repositioning into those stable assets is expensive (i.e. the post-retirement advantage is offset by a pre-retirement loss). At least, that line of though makes sense to me.
Independent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 09:03 AM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
freebird5825's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Nowhere, 43N Latitude, NY
Posts: 9,030
Using suvivor pension and fixed annuity for income until I can apply for my FERS deferred MRA+10 pension in 5.5 years at age 56. Under FERS rules, SS gap will allegedly be offset. So I have read...

No SS suvivor benefit possible for LH's w*rk history (CSRS fed govt).

Down the road (12 years), I will have my own SS benefit, and plan on taking it right at 62. FWIW by then.
"All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them." - Walt Disney
freebird5825 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 09:29 AM   #20
Moderator Emeritus
W2R's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 45,355
Originally Posted by freebird5825 View Post
Using suvivor pension and fixed annuity for income until I can apply for my FERS deferred MRA+10 pension in 5.5 years at age 56. Under FERS rules, SS gap will allegedly be offset. So I have read....
Not with MRA+10, to the best of my understanding. Might be worth doublechecking.
Happily retired since 2009, at age 61.
W2R is online now   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Social Security Engineer FIRECalc support 2 09-20-2007 03:00 PM
Social Security at 62, 66 or 70? gozzie FIRE and Money 79 03-27-2007 05:52 PM
Social security? cute fuzzy bunny FIRECalc support 12 09-11-2006 12:47 PM
Social Security...or what? jake Other topics 19 10-16-2004 06:39 AM
Social Security-Take It Now Or Later? haha Other topics 22 10-08-2004 03:36 PM

» Quick Links

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.