Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
"Strategy fund" expenses - double dipping?
Old 03-04-2006, 07:35 AM   #1
Moderator Emeritus
Rich_by_the_Bay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 8,827
"Strategy fund" expenses - double dipping?

The so-called life strategy funds seem logical to me but I can't help but wonder if they don't ding you twice for expenses.

For example, the Vanguard 2025 fund has an expense ratio of .2%. It consists solely of other Vanguard funds which each have their own expense ratios, such as .27% for the Vanguard European Fund. So you seem to be paying .2% + .27%, or .47% expense ratio - rather high for a Vanguard index type fund.

For just a little effort on your own to buy and adjust comparable index funds annually, you cut your expenses in half. Plus you can fine tune your distributions as you see fit, fund by fund.

So what am I missing? Is the "set it and forget it" aspect worth doubling your expenses?
__________________
Rich
San Francisco Area
ESR'd March 2010. FIRE'd January 2011.

As if you didn't know..If the above message contains medical content, it's NOT intended as advice, and may not be accurate, applicable or sufficient. Don't rely on it for any purpose. Consult your own doctor for all medical advice.
Rich_by_the_Bay is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Re: "Strategy fund" expenses - double dipping?
Old 03-04-2006, 07:40 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
cute fuzzy bunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
Re: "Strategy fund" expenses - double dipping?

I dont think that you pay the fees on the underlying funds, just on the one strategy fund you buy.

Then they also do the rebalancing for you.
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
cute fuzzy bunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: "Strategy fund" expenses - double dipping?
Old 03-04-2006, 07:49 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
cute fuzzy bunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
Re: "Strategy fund" expenses - double dipping?

"According to an agreement between the Target Retirement Funds and Vanguard, the
Funds’ expenses will be offset by a reimbursement from Vanguard for (1) the Funds’
contributions to the costs of operating the underlying Vanguard funds in which the Target
Retirement Funds invest, and (2) certain savings in administrative and marketing costs that
Vanguard expects to derive from the Funds’ operation.
The Funds’ trustees believe that the reimbursements should be sufficient to offset most,
if not all, of the expenses incurred by the Funds. As a result, each Fund is expected to
operate at a very low or zero expense ratio. Since their inception in 2003, the Funds, in fact,
have incurred no direct net expenses.


Although the Target Retirement Funds are not expected to incur any net expenses
directly, the Funds’ shareholders indirectly bear the expenses of the underlying Vanguard
funds. The expense ratios for the Investor Shares of each of the underlying funds during"
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
cute fuzzy bunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: "Strategy fund" expenses - double dipping?
Old 03-04-2006, 07:56 AM   #4
Moderator Emeritus
Rich_by_the_Bay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 8,827
Re: "Strategy fund" expenses - double dipping?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cute n' Fuzzy Bunny
"According to an agreement between the Target Retirement Funds and Vanguard, the Funds’ expenses will be offset by a reimbursement from Vanguard for (1) the Funds’ contributions to the costs of operating the underlying Vanguard funds in which the Target Retirement Funds invest, and (2) certain savings in administrative and marketing costs that Vanguard expects to derive from the Funds’ operation.The Funds’ trustees believe that the reimbursements should be sufficient to offset most, if not all, of the expenses incurred by the Funds. As a result, each Fund is expected tooperate at a very low or zero expense ratio. Since their inception in 2003, the Funds, in fact, have incurred no direct net expenses. Although the Target Retirement Funds are not expected to incur any net expenses directly, the Funds’ shareholders indirectly bear the expenses of the underlying Vanguard funds...
Hmmm ... they list an expense ratio of .2% for the target fund, as noted in my original post - I can only assume this represents the weighted expenses of the underlying funds they invest in, then.
__________________
Rich
San Francisco Area
ESR'd March 2010. FIRE'd January 2011.

As if you didn't know..If the above message contains medical content, it's NOT intended as advice, and may not be accurate, applicable or sufficient. Don't rely on it for any purpose. Consult your own doctor for all medical advice.
Rich_by_the_Bay is offline   Reply With Quote
Re: "Strategy fund" expenses - double dipping?
Old 03-04-2006, 08:34 AM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
cute fuzzy bunny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
Re: "Strategy fund" expenses - double dipping?

Thats how I read it. Looks like they charge nothing directly for the overarching fund and dont plan to, although its not completely out of the question, and what they do charge is a weighted expense average, perhaps with some downward adjustment since the target retirements 'purchase' of the underlying funds in bulk may constitute some sort of 'institutional' share holding that will not vary greatly from one year to the next.

Of course, i've seen people do in-depth analysis of actual fund expenses including trading costs and whatnot, and the results were really eye opening. I'm not sure I've seen that done for vanguards funds, particularly these funds of funds of indexes of buckets of stocks...
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
cute fuzzy bunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Expenses Vincenzo FIRE and Money 11 05-13-2007 07:48 PM
Expenses after FIRE - Huh?? Rich_by_the_Bay FIRE and Money 55 04-23-2007 02:32 PM
Expenses KM FIRE and Money 6 02-07-2007 08:27 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:38 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.