Portal Forums Links Register FAQ Community Calendar Log in

Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
tax withholding for ERs
Old 07-30-2007, 02:48 PM   #1
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 608
tax withholding for ERs

I'm trying to figure out if I can avoid having to do estimated tax
payments, simply by having tax withheld from annuity payments
(reported on 1099-R).

I recall a rule that applied when withholding from wages on a W-2,
that said amounts withheld were considered to be withheld evenly
over the entire year, even if they weren't really withheld evenly.
For example, if you saw you were heading towards an underpayment
penalty, you could increase your W-2 withholding dramatically for,
say, the last two pay periods of the year, and be fine.

I'm wondering if this same rule applies to other kinds of withholding,
specifically that from an annuity reported on 1099-R forms.

I've perused Publication 505 and can't seem to find an answer -
but, I can't find the rule I recall for W-2 withholdings either.
JohnEyles is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 07-30-2007, 03:01 PM   #2
Moderator Emeritus
Nords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnEyles View Post
I'm trying to figure out if I can avoid having to do estimated tax payments, simply by having tax withheld from annuity payments (reported on 1099-R).
I don't know the answer, but the form used for checking witholding against income is 2210AI (annualized installments). It might have the info you're looking for.

But here's another question: If you can hold onto your money for an additional 1-3 months by making estimated tax payments, and put that money in an account earning 5% APY, is it worth your time to continue making estimated payments?
__________________
*

Co-author (with my daughter) of “Raising Your Money-Savvy Family For Next Generation Financial Independence.”
Author of the book written on E-R.org: "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement."

I don't spend much time here— please send a PM.
Nords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2007, 03:38 PM   #3
Moderator Emeritus
Martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: minnesota
Posts: 13,228
I think you are ok, but I won't say so under oath.

Publication 505 says:

You must pay estimated tax for 2007 if both of the following apply.
  1. You expect to owe at least $1,000 in tax for 2007, after subtracting your withholding and credits.
  2. You expect your withholding and credits to be less than the smaller of:
    1. 90% of the tax to be shown on your 2007 tax return, or
    2. 100% of the tax shown on your 2006 tax return. Your 2006 tax return must cover all 12 months.
So, if you withhold enough you will be fine, even if you withhold a lot more for the last couple of checks for the year. The question is what kind of penalty gets charged if you end up not withholding enough. This is where it is important to know if the presumption applies that the withholding was even throughout the year. If so, that could result in a lower penalty. I do not know the answer to that question. You could ask on the Fairmark Forum if no one here knows. Fairmark Forum
__________________
.


No more lawyer stuff, no more political stuff, so no more CYA

Martha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2007, 10:03 PM   #4
Full time employment: Posting here.
old woman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 567
It is even over the year when withheld from pensions or wages.
I withhold my December pay for taxes some years.
old woman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2007, 11:55 PM   #5
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 608
Quote:
Originally Posted by old woman View Post
It is even over the year when withheld from pensions or wages.
So the rule that I relied on, during my working life, for withholding
shown on a W-2, also applies to withholding shown on a 1099-R ?
JohnEyles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2007, 03:33 PM   #6
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 608
I asked my question again at google-group misc.taxes.moderated,
and the nice oflks there answered in the affirmative (1099
witholding is considered spread evenly throughout year, same
as W-2 witholding) but pointed out it MAY be to one's advantage
to override this default. Below is my query to that group,
followed by several of the better answers ...

> When I was a W-2 employee, there was a nice rule that said
> that ALL money withheld from my wages were considered to be
> evenly withheld throughout the year, regardless of when they
> were actually withheld. For example, if forseeing a big
> underpayment penalty, one could dramatically increase one's
> withholding for the last few pay periods.
> I'm wondering if the same rule applies to withholding on
> 1099s - the 1099-R (for annuties and pensions) in particular?


Yes. All withholding from all sources is treated the same.
It's spread evenly through the year unless you elect on Form
2210 to have it applied as withheld. See IRS Publication
505.

******

Considering withholding as evenly withheld throughout the
year is the default setting. Optional is proving that it was not.
Thus if you got a large IRA withdrawal in March, it might
behoove you to use actual withholding per quarter instead of
the optional default method.

******

Yes John ALL withholding may be treated as averaged or in
the specific period it was withheld, Many seniors with RMDs
don't pay installments but have their RMD agent withhold
enough tax to either meet the last year's tax safe harbor,
or the 90% of current year's tax safe harbor. This has a
lot of advantages of Leaving money in the IRA for the
longest time, paying the taxes in December out of funds
drawn in December, no installment concerns or form 2210 or
penalties.
Be sure yur IRA Aagent is willing, can you just tell them
verbally or must they have something in writing. How much
leadtime because it must be withheld in December or earlier.
etc.
JohnEyles is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Taxes tryan Other topics 0 12-08-2006 07:45 AM
When are estimated tax payments necesary? WanderALot FIRE and Money 12 04-18-2006 04:54 PM
Tax compliance costs 22c for every dollar collected cute fuzzy bunny Other topics 15 01-19-2006 02:36 AM
Income tax withholding - not enough BristolBane Other topics 16 06-30-2005 10:49 AM
Bush floats a national sales tax dex FIRE and Money 22 08-17-2004 07:15 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:13 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.