omni550 said:
I got my snowbird condo mortgage through Third Federal Savings and Loan* several years before my pension began. I had to show them proof of funds, insurance papers, etc. but had absolutely no issue getting pre-approved for more than I ended-up spending on my condo.
At closing, my lawyer said he'd looked up Third Federal and was surprised to learn how big they were in the home mortgage business across the U.S.
*
https://www.thirdfederal.com/ if you care to check their rates
I worked for them for a long time. TFSL
never had loan officers on commission since they opened in 1938. They cherry pick the best applicants so their default and loss rates are very, very low. Their focus has always been Customer First but for real.
The CEO has been quoted as saying "Family first and work second" and the bank really practices it. If an employee, for example, had a kid doing a play in the middle of the work day then other employees would cover their work so the parent could attend. Plus many other examples.
TFS will sell loans to gain capital for future loans but has never sold the
servicing of a loan and says they never will. The benefit to the customer is that you will deal with TFS for the full loan period, not some other company five years from now.
If you want a good dividend stock look at TFSL. It's 28 cents per share quarterly and at their current price it's a 7.8% yield.
TFSL has an uncommon corporate structure because they're a mutual holding company that completed one of the two steps to go fully public and have said they will never do the second step.
The holding company that only owns the bank, TFS Financial, is the TFSL stock symbol and they own 81% of the stock. The implication of that is that the holding company should receive 81% of the "dividend pot" but each year the holding company takes a vote to waive their share of the dividend. It passes each year with a wide margin.
That means that the remaining 19% of shareholders receive 100% of the dividend pot.
I know, uncommon, eh? This odd structure causes the investment bots to miscalculate the TFSL dividend payout and report that the company routinely pays a dividend far exceeding their income. They don't. But if the dividend waiver vote ever fails then the amount of money going to the individual shareholders will drop dramatically.
TFSL has to hold that "dividend waiver" vote each year because the company Directors who set the dividend are shareholders. So the Fed sees it as a conflict of interest that requires a vote each year.
Oh, and if an analyst like Zacks says something about the management discussion on the conference call, TFSL has not held one in about a decade. That analyst is just posting standard BS and not a real analysis.