lawman
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Agencies are slightly less safe and are not free of state taxes.
Is that the only difference?
Agencies are slightly less safe and are not free of state taxes.
I'm not 100% sure. I am positive that Treasury bills are state-tax free. Agency bonds do include several different issuers that may have different tax treatments. Maybe someone else knows.Isn't the tax status you reference, only true for some Treasury Agencies?
As far as I know, but I am no expert.Is that the only difference?
I'm not 100% sure. I am positive that Treasury bills are state-tax free. Agency bonds do include several different issuers that may have different tax treatments. Maybe someone else knows.
Some GSEs are tax exempt, but I can't find an IRS/Treasury source:
https://www.raymondjames.com/wealth...vernment-sponsored-enterprise-debt-securities
https://www.rbcwm-usa.com/resources/file-687493.pdf
Some GSEs are callable but that will be shown on the brokerage bond listing page. I'm keeping my ladder short. The 6 month GSEs have a lower yield and higher minimum than UST.Is that the only difference?
The U.S. Code providing state-tax exemption in all states for certain GSEs is in the PA link. For example:The taxation of GSEs may vary depending on state law, so I would not expect the IRS to provide guidance.
Example: for NY :www.tax.ny.gov/pdf/memos/income/m95_4i.pdf
for PA: https://www.revenue.pa.gov/FormsandPublications/FormsforIndividuals/PIT/Documents/rev-1643.pdf
10-year is going bonkers this morning. Yields up (price down).http://tos.mx/9bMsI54
ETA: Yes, a .1% move is "bonkers"
You made me look.Same. My weighted duration on my non-I-Bond treasuries as of this mornings purchase is 140 days (weighted YTM is 3.26% annualized).
10-year is going bonkers this morning. Yields up (price down).http://tos.mx/9bMsI54
ETA: Yes, a .1% move is "bonkers"
Checking today on Vanguard i see some Morgan Stanley CD's, 1 yr @ 4%.
However, the 1 yr Tbill is paying 4% and no local or state taxes.
My question is why would anyone pick the CD over the Tbill?
Seems like a no "brainer" to me but what do I know.
If T-Bills default then there won't be enough money in the FDIC to pay the insurance. T-Bills are safer than CDs. FDIC insurance is an illusion in the event of a mass default.I'm in a 5% tax state, and it matters. Effectively it can be about 0.3%
I think the other reason people choose CDs is the FDIC insurance. That personally doesn't factor in for me. If T-Bills are defaulted on, then I'm in the basement monitoring my bunker and emergency food supply.
+1. I've always assumed the same...not that FDIC insurance hasn't/wouldn't be helpful in a lesser event.If T-Bills default then there won't be enough money in the FDIC to pay the insurance. T-Bills are safer than CDs. FDIC insurance is an illusion in the event of a mass default.
Thanks much. That’s all very interesting. A 17 week T-bill may be a useful duration while waiting for rates to rise.
I was waiting for CD rates to hit 4% for a 5 year term and then I was going to start buying. I noticed today that I can buy secondary market Treasury notes through Vanguard for slightly over 4% but that the 4% CDs are callable. So, treasuries seems like a better deal. They cannot be called and they are better protected (although FDIC CDs are very safe).
I quickly perused the above threads to try and understand New vs Secondary. As I understand it, I can lock in the 4% rate today on the secondary or I can buy at auction but then take a risk that it settles more or less than the secondary rate. And I have to wait until the next auction to find out. My thought is I would rather lock in a known rate than an unknown rate. So, I am thinking of purchasing today. Any flaws in my logic?
I know many of you would suggest not locking in 5 years, since you believe interest rates will continue to rise, but, they may fall as well. So, my question is not about locking in 5 years but rather about buying Treasuries at Secondary vs Auction. I have never purchased a Treasury before and want to make sure I am not missing something.
Checking today on Vanguard i see some Morgan Stanley CD's, 1 yr @ 4%.
However, the 1 yr Tbill is paying 4% and no local or state taxes.
My question is why would anyone pick the CD over the Tbill?
Seems like a no "brainer" to me but what do I know.
If things got so bad they don't honor FDIC you better have a bunker with food and ammo.If T-Bills default then there won't be enough money in the FDIC to pay the insurance. T-Bills are safer than CDs. FDIC insurance is an illusion in the event of a mass default.
If things got so bad they don't honor FDIC you better have a bunker with food and ammo.
At that point, food and ammo would be the only currency of relevance