|
|
02-08-2006, 09:12 PM
|
#1
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 77
|
True Diversification
I keep seeing posts implying they are fully diversified. Then they give their allocations, and they are actually about 90% in the US market (US small caps, US large cap, US Mid cap, US short term bonds, US long term bonds. With maybe 10% in international
Am I missing something, or, if you are allocated like that, you are still 90% in the US market. If the US market tanks, most of your portfolio tanks to some extent. If you are planning to ER FI, that's not a comforting feeling.
Anyone have a recommendation for a Trully diversified portfolio? I've read some books lately that seem to make a lot of sense (How to Retire Early, and Enjoy Life, on less than $1MM is one), that make the argument to get truly diversified with very much noncorrelated investments.
Here's my portfolio thinking:
20% US stock index fund
20% International stock index fund
20% Emerging Markets (probably a managed fund, unless someone knows of a good index for emerging markets?)
20% Real Estate (REITS or individual houses / duplexes / apartments)
20% International Bonds?
Thoughts?? I'm thinking this is the portfolio (or something like it) that will work when you are building up your retirement, as well as after retirement.
Where are the holes in my theory?? (I'm sure there are plenty; I just can't seem to see them right now)
Gracias
__________________
Most People are about as happy as they make up their mind to be - A. Lincoln
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
02-08-2006, 09:52 PM
|
#2
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,610
|
Re: True Diversification
Quote:
Originally Posted by getoutearly
Here's my portfolio thinking:
20% US stock index fund
20% International stock index fund
20% Emerging Markets (probably a managed fund, unless someone knows of a good index for emerging markets?)
20% Real Estate (REITS or individual houses / duplexes / apartments)
20% International Bonds?
|
Don't know anything about you, but here are a couple of thoughts:
*Excessive Emerging Markets.* Only 5 to 10% Try VEIEX for an index.* Try FEMKX if you want managed and better performance.
*I think it is the wrong time, wrong place for 20% REITS.* Maybe 5-10%.
*Within your international bonds I'd insert about 5% emerging nations bonds. FNMIX works for this.
* Use the funds you cut from EM and reits to get a good mix of US stocks.
*FSIIX is a good choice for that 20% International.
I could be wrong
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 11:01 PM
|
#3
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Far NW 'burbs of Chicago
Posts: 898
|
Re: True Diversification
The big question is, "If the US markets tank will the foreign markets do any better?"
I don't know the answer, but there are intelligent people on both sides of the issue.
It probably would depend on WHY the US markets tanked. If you can accurately predict the reason and timing for the US problems, then you might be able to answer the rest. Otherwise...
|
|
|
02-08-2006, 11:31 PM
|
#4
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 911
|
Re: True Diversification
Gold has been in my portfolio since early 2005. Yup. I know.... no divs, etc. Regardless of that though, I have noticed that it has acted like a shock absorber in my relatively small portfolio...the performance has been nice too. Anyone know the beta for gold (or even GLD for that matter)?
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 12:02 AM
|
#5
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 184
|
Re: True Diversification
I've been reading David Swenson's (Yale endowment manager) book. Excellent reading.
His theme is "equity orientation with substantial diversification". Be an owner, not a lender (hates bonds). Aggressively diversify across asset classes that done correlate. Buy into asset classes when valuations are reasonable / out-of-favor.
Below is mix of Yale. Real assets is both Real Estate and natural resources (lots of timber). Suprising to me how low US stock portion is.
Domestic Equity 14.9%
Absolute Return 25.1
Foreign Equity 14.6
Private Equity 14.9
Real Assets 20.9
Fixed Income 7.4
Cash 2.1
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 02:28 AM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,713
|
Re: True Diversification
Ddave, what's the nature of "Absolute Return"? (sure sounds good!)
That's the biggest chunk..
The equity is 1/3 domestic, 1/3 foreign, 1/3 private; since most people don't access private equity, the 50/50 domestic/foreign sounds about right to me at this point. All my gains lately have been from foreign stocks; if I held only domestic I would probably be behind.
I don't know why, but I would be nervous with getoutearly's 20% US and 60% foreign scenario. Can't put my finger on it; could just be emotional.
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 07:00 AM
|
#7
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lou-evil
Posts: 2,025
|
Re: True Diversification
I doubt any of us have access to some of Yale's investments - private equity and real assets to name two. They actually own the assets of timber land and do not invest via Plum Creek or some other timber REIT. If I had access to those investments I would consider owning less in the way of pure equities too.
Back to the OP -
I recall reading some asset allocation academic paper and it suggested an international allocation beyond 25-30% will provide your portfolio with unwanted currency risk - i.e. diminishing diversification effects and it could hamstring you in the end. So you basically have 60% open to currency fluctuations once you include another 20% in intl' bonds assuming it is all unhedged. I would not be comfortable with that much and I believe I have quite a bit - about 25% and I rebalanced out of emerging markets at the beginning of the year. Just remember how much the emerging markets move if the US has a hiccup.
I would cut the emerging markets allocation and slice and dice among different market cap/style US index funds. Why just intl' bonds? If I were to have 20% real estate in a portfolio it would be through direct investment/ownership and I don't think I would rush into REITs - yields are a major part of your return and its yield is very low from historical levels.
__________________
"These walls are kind of funny. First you hate 'em, then you get used to 'em. Enough time passes, gets so you depend on them"
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 10:08 AM
|
#8
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 87
|
Yale Lazy Portfolio
Actually Swenson recommends the following diversified portfolio, with actual example funds from Vanguard:
Total Market Index (VTSMX)* *30%
Total International Stock Index (VGTSX)* *20%
REIT Index (VGSIX)* 20%
US Treasury Bond index (VFISX) 15%
TIPS bond index (VIPSX)* 15%
This includes 30% bonds.* He discusses these in his Core Assets chapter of his book.* Paul Farrell wrote an article about this portfolio which is available at marketwatch.com
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 11:02 AM
|
#9
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,455
|
Re: True Diversification
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gearhead Jim
The big question is, "If the US markets tank will the foreign markets do any better?"
|
Probably not.
__________________
May we live in peace and harmony and be free from all human sufferings.
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 11:31 AM
|
#10
|
Dryer sheet aficionado
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 31
|
Re: True Diversification
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladelfina
Ddave, what's the nature of "Absolute Return"? (sure sounds good!)
That's the biggest chunk..
|
Hedge funds
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 11:32 AM
|
#11
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
|
Re: True Diversification
I'm thinking lately that asset allocation is a lot of fun, but I'm not sure how productive it is.
Over longer term periods - say 15 to 20 years - you have a tough time beating a broad index.
Over shorter time periods, say 1 to 10 years - you might get some traction IF you pick the right buckets AND put enough into them to matter. The only problem is, finding the right buckets and avoiding the wrong ones.
Current asset allocation 'schemes' look at data historically and note historic yings and yangs and historic correlation and coupling of various asset classes. Aside from a few obvious connections that directly affect some assets, those buckets may or may not do anything remotely like what they did historically. I think you can analyze the bejesus out of it and think you see something, or go with a surface logic "these all moved differently and/or did well when these other ones didnt" and think you've got something.
A lot of that data relies on economic situations in the 50's, 60's, and 70's. Politically, economically and financially a very different time than the ones upcoming. A lot of them include a period during the late 90's that may have been a once in a lifetime event.
I was really into the slicing and dicing until I decided that I was probably fooling myself. Sure, I had good energy, precious metals and reit holdings that had just kicked the doors down; it was pretty easy to feel pretty smart.
Now...five or ten years ago, would you have picked those as being great places to put a large chunk of money? If you didnt bet big, you didnt really make much of it.
I've actually been into portfolio simplication lately. I did say several years ago and have felt so until recently that overall market indexes were slugs and overpriced. I dont feel so much that way anymore. My taxable portfolio these days is a big chunk of target retirement 2045 alongside a big chunk of windsor II; IRA is split between TSM and small cap value. Roth is in the Asset Allocation fund. So taxable is mostly large cap with a strong value tilt while IRA has more mid cap and a small cap value tilt.
5 funds down from about 20 a year or so ago. Dropped my expense ratio down to .18.
A lot of those large caps are multinationals. The funds own 8.5% foreign directly, so I have some of that.
I think that sometimes by "diversifying" you might refocus money from a broader chance to make lots of little wins to a narrower chance of making a big win in a lot of narrower categories.
Now if I only knew what was going to be hot, continue to be hot, or stop being hot over the next 10 years...
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 06:19 PM
|
#12
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,228
|
Re: True Diversification
Good post. I think some people use "diversification" as an excuse to justify market timing that they wouldn't have done otherwise. They notice that REITs or gold or whatever is hot and then tell themselves they are getting into it for diversification when really they are doing market timing.
I especially see this with international... everyone is boosting their international percentage now that it's the hot thing. That's fine if you understand that you are doing market timing. But don't kid yourself that you are doing it for diversification. If you got into international 10 or more years ago and held it throughout all the declines, then you can claim to be a diversifyer. But if you looked at international over the past decades and didn't jump in until recently, you are timing.
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 07:42 PM
|
#13
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LaLa Land
Posts: 4,698
|
Re: True Diversification
CFB,
You say that you have TSM in your IRA, would it be better served in a taxable account?
__________________
Work is something you do to get enough $ so you don't have to....Me.
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 08:28 PM
|
#14
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
|
Re: True Diversification
Why?
I'm looking for long term growth, 20+ years, low cost.
What would I have in there instead?
In my taxable, I have target retirement 2045, a good sized portion of which is TSM, and a high dividend yield component.
Gives us additional income and good medium to long term growth.
Tax efficiency is sort of irrelevant. I either dont pay any or dont pay much.
Quite intentionally and by plan.
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 08:29 PM
|
#15
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,455
|
Re: True Diversification
Quote:
They notice that REITs or gold or whatever is hot and then tell themselves they are getting into it for diversification when really they are doing market timing.
|
Sometime it is called momentum inesting ot strategic allocation.
__________________
May we live in peace and harmony and be free from all human sufferings.
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 08:34 PM
|
#16
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
|
Re: True Diversification
Oh...you mean speculation on a time table?
I did some of that in the late 90's with nasdaq etfs. To some good results early on. Not so good later.
But I guess if I had invested in 5-6 "buckets" I could just say that one was 'underperforming' and that the others would be 'kicking in' to keep the 'peanut butter' 'spread around' or some such.
If I said it with an english accent, it'd be positively compelling.
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 08:46 PM
|
#17
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LaLa Land
Posts: 4,698
|
Re: True Diversification
Quote:
Originally Posted by (Cute Fuzzy Bunny)
Why?
I'm looking for long term growth, 20+ years, low cost.
What would I have in there instead?
In my taxable, I have target retirement 2045, a good sized portion of which is TSM, and a high dividend yield component.
Gives us additional income and good medium to long term growth.
Tax efficiency is sort of irrelevant.* I either dont pay any or dont pay much.
Quite intentionally and by plan.
|
If the target retirement has a large holding of TSM would it be cheaper to just hold Index funds such as TSM?
From what I've been reading it seems that TSM is better served in a taxable account. Just trying to learn which is best.
__________________
Work is something you do to get enough $ so you don't have to....Me.
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 09:00 PM
|
#18
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
|
Re: True Diversification
Well, conventional wisdom of an accumulator is to hold stocks in your taxable and bond/reit holdings in your IRA/401k where the nonqualified dividends wont bang you in the head while you're in a high tax bracket.
Its still a good idea to hold tax inefficient holdings in your IRA after you're retired, unless you need access to the income.
The target retirement starts with a lot of stock now, and by the time we're in our 60's will be in the 60/40 range. I dont have to sell shares or rebalance.
For an ER that doesnt need high current income...like, say if you have a working wife...my plan is to keep the bond holdings low, keep the qualified dividend income high (and limited), and make as few changes as possible between now and when we start getting pissed that we arent going to get social security
My wife has a small invested pension plan and a small but growing 403b. When I feel the urge to 'tinker', I change her asset allocation all around. About once a year. Settles the urge. Nobody gets hurt.
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 09:04 PM
|
#19
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LaLa Land
Posts: 4,698
|
Re: True Diversification
Got it, thanks.
__________________
Work is something you do to get enough $ so you don't have to....Me.
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 09:12 PM
|
#20
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
|
Re: True Diversification
Quote:
Originally Posted by 73ss454
ust trying to learn which is best.
|
By the way, me too. I figure in ten years I'll know...
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|