Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Vanguard apparently sold FIFO rather than SpecID
Old 04-24-2016, 09:36 AM   #1
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,034
Vanguard apparently sold FIFO rather than SpecID

I have a mix of shares in a Vanguard fund that I sold some shares of on 4/22. I have some old noncovered shares which have a gain, and some new covered shares, some of which have a gain, and others from 2014 and 2015 purchases at a loss.

When I sold, I was presented with the shares to select. I chose all of the 2014 and 2015 shares, and nothing else, intending to take the loss.

I look today, and those shares are still available under "Unrealized gains and losses". I thought it probably just hadn't settled yet, but when I looked under "Realized gains and losses", I had a fairly large gain. Selecting details, it shows the 4/22 transaction, and says it used FIFO as the cost basis.

I know for certain I did not select FIFO and I checked my cost basis method under account maintenance and it says Specific ID.

Just to verify there wasn't some confusing option, I started another transaction, and to use FIFO I would have to either select the "Change Cost Basis" link, or I would've had to have put the exact number of shares I bought in 2014 and 2015 in the box for the noncovered shares. I know for certain I did neither. I never really paid attention to the number of shares being sold. I just clicked on all the losers, noticing they were all from 2014 and 2015, and looked at the total estimated proceeds and decided that was what I wanted.

Has anyone seen this? Will this get resolved on the settlement date? Even if so, that's alarming and disturbing, and if I were to try to sell more shares today I would not have the correct option of shares to select to sell.

Or does Vanguard always sell noncovered shares first until those are exhausted, ignoring your SpecID designation?

I have an email into my Flagship rep. Just wondering if anyone else has seen this and can confirm that it will be resolved, or if they can adjust the cost basis method post-sale.
RunningBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 04-24-2016, 09:54 AM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,160
Some folks at Bogleheads have the same issue based on the thread below. Contact Vanguard to resolve. From one post:
Quote:
It's a longstanding problem with their "cost basis vendor" that they are well aware of, but have not been able to fix. I have moved my holdings out of Vanguard as a direct result of this issue -- and the fact that they apparently would not have caught it on their own had I not noticed it myself.
Source: https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=181258
MBSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2016, 10:09 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by MBSC View Post
Some folks at Bogleheads have the same issue based on the thread below. Contact Vanguard to resolve. From one post:
Source: https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=181258
Thanks, that's it exactly, and that thread is helpful. I'll follow up my already sent message with a phone call tomorrow to see if this can get fixed before the settlement.

It's disturbing that this has been going on so long and still not be fixed. This is the kind of thing that makes me question whether Vanguard is the right place for my money. One problem is, I've got over $300K in LTCGs so I feel like I'm locked into those funds. I could move them to another brokerage, but I'd think that would complicate cost basis reporting even more, not to mention a transaction fee when selling/buying/exchanging.
RunningBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2016, 11:10 AM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 35,287
I just checked... I have not experienced that problem but thanks for the post as I'll stay alert for it.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2016, 10:50 AM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,034
I called this morning and they will change it over to the shares I intended to sell. The flagship rep said the cost basis group didn't give a reason for the glitch. I made it clear I was very unhappy and uncomfortable with them having most of my money if they can't follow my transaction instructions, and he said he'd pass that feedback along. As I said, it'd hurt me to move my taxable account elsewhere (losing my Admiral shares, for one), but my Roth and tIRA are certainly candidates. Not doing anything rash now.
RunningBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2016, 10:57 AM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: W Wash
Posts: 1,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunningBum View Post
As I said, it'd hurt me to move my taxable account elsewhere (losing my Admiral shares, for one), but my Roth and tIRA are certainly candidates. Not doing anything rash now.
Just a FYI, you can replicate many of the Admiral positions with the equivalents in Vanguard ETF's. I have most of our portfolio at Fidelity and can buy and sell Vanguard ETF just like any other for 7.95 per trade. If you reinvest dividends, those are made without charge.
Nwsteve
nwsteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2016, 02:00 PM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwsteve View Post
Just a FYI, you can replicate many of the Admiral positions with the equivalents in Vanguard ETF's. I have most of our portfolio at Fidelity and can buy and sell Vanguard ETF just like any other for 7.95 per trade. If you reinvest dividends, those are made without charge.
Nwsteve
Good point, thanks. If I get to that point, I'll convert to ETFs before transferring.
RunningBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2016, 04:00 PM   #8
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunningBum View Post
... As I said, it'd hurt me to move my taxable account elsewhere (losing my Admiral shares, for one), ...
Vanguard will let you downgrade your Admiral shares to Investor shares (a non-taxable event), and then you can do a transfer to another brokerage, again not a taxable event.

I did this when consolidating accounts in my FIL's trust after he passed. The Vanguard rep actually took the words out of my mouth (so you want to downgrade to Investor shares?) before I finished! Then we moved those shares to Fidelity.

-ERD50
ERD50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2016, 04:57 PM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERD50 View Post
Vanguard will let you downgrade your Admiral shares to Investor shares (a non-taxable event), and then you can do a transfer to another brokerage, again not a taxable event.

I did this when consolidating accounts in my FIL's trust after he passed. The Vanguard rep actually took the words out of my mouth (so you want to downgrade to Investor shares?) before I finished! Then we moved those shares to Fidelity.

-ERD50
Yes, that would be "losing my Admiral shares", as I noted. At a cost of around $1000/year in expenses, so I don't consider it a good option. At Vanguard, switching to ETF shares is also not a taxable event, and usually the same in fee costs as Admiral shares. Unfortunately PRIMECAP does not have ETF shares.
RunningBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is it patriotic to spend rather than to save ? obgyn65 Other topics 29 01-19-2012 03:32 AM
Term Life on Pension rather than Benefit options? Maneiac FIRE and Money 14 01-04-2007 04:55 PM
pull cord sooner rather than later? califdreamer FIRE and Money 43 07-27-2006 07:35 PM
hotels built and sold and sold again renferme FIRE and Money 5 07-10-2006 09:19 AM
Who is working to be FI rather than FIRE? maddythebeagle Young Dreamers 30 05-09-2006 09:09 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:16 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.