|
|
Watching TV costs you $1 million+ over a lifetime
07-18-2007, 12:43 AM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,318
|
Watching TV costs you $1 million+ over a lifetime
Gee, and we thought posting here instead of watching TV was just for fun... Turns out it could be a key LBYM strategy. The true cost of watching TV:
Yahoo! Personal Finance
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
07-18-2007, 01:56 AM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,072
|
Interesting. And it is all discretionary spending.
I have seen similar projections using cars. The one that struck me was the example of buy a car every 10 years instead of every 5 and retire 5 years earlier. OR something like that.
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 09:00 AM
|
#3
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
|
Eh...very subjective.
TV: Hmmm...$1500 every ten years. Seems like cheap entertainment. Under $10k for my lifetime.
Entertainment cabinet system: $0. My tv's always come with a stand.
Cable: $80/month. About $38k for the rest of my likely lifespan, not including lost opportunity/investment costs.
Pay-per-view: Never watch them. With 225 channels and a tivo, its tough to find the need. $0.
Movies: Never go, hardly ever rent, watch them for 'free' on HBO/Starz. $0.
DVD/DVR:Free from directv. No charge for service under my directv plan. $0
Gaming system: Doesnt actually have anything to do with watching television, but ok...lets say $300 every 5 years...$4-5k over my lifetime, presuming I'm into playing Halo MCXVII in 2035.
Games: I cant think of anyone who buys $100 worth of games per month in perpetuity. People who game that much rent them. But lets go nuts and say you buy 10 games per game platform. $500 every 5 years.
Energy: Going with the $10 month figure...$4800 for my lifetime.
Commercials: I have a tivo, I dont watch commercials. $0.
Opportunity costs: Wow, instead of relaxing and being entertained, I could be working?!? Holy cow...I'm on it. Next i'm going to get rid of that money losing "sleep" thing...
A total of roughly $60k for 40 years of passive entertainment. Seems pretty reasonable to me.
Shoot, tivo missed a major marketing opportunity..."Buy a tivo, save $940,000 over your lifetime!!!"
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 09:58 AM
|
#4
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,155
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ESRBob
Gee, and we thought posting here instead of watching TV was just for fun... Turns out it could be a key LBYM strategy. The true cost of watching TV:
Yahoo! Personal Finance
|
Come on, this is an extreme exaggeration. Not driving a car, maybe. But 1MM for TV watching? Not a chance!
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 10:11 AM
|
#5
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 994
|
What about the cost of going from analog to digital TV in 2009 ?
Seems like a good time to pull the plug.
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 10:13 AM
|
#6
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
|
Either $0 if you're using digital cable or satellite, which will downconvert to analog in the box. $50 for a downconverting tuner for people using broadcast tv. The feds are even supposed to subsidize the cost of the tuner for people below a certain wage level.
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 10:13 AM
|
#7
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,360
|
Just imagine how much you could save if you eschewed pointless luxuries like food, clothing and shelter.
I have a television but only get one channel because I am too cheap to pay for cable. Essentially it is just a platform for me to watch DVDs, which come free from the library (I received the player as a gift).
__________________
"To know what you prefer, instead of humbly saying Amen to what the world tells you you ought to prefer, is to have kept your soul alive". Robert Louis Stevenson, An Inland Voyage (1878)
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 10:17 AM
|
#8
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 994
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cute fuzzy bunny
Either $0 if you're using digital cable or satellite, which will downconvert to analog in the box. $50 for a downconverting tuner for people using broadcast tv. The feds are even supposed to subsidize the cost of the tuner for people below a certain wage level.
|
I called my cable company and was told I will have to rent or buy
a converter box... oh, the government is going to pay for it ?
Hold on to your wallets.
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 10:29 AM
|
#9
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
|
Ah you have analog cable. The cable companies have been phasing that out anyhow in favor of digital, since that requires a box and if you have a box you might watch a payperview or spontaneously order premium channels. Lots harder to pirate as well.
Yeah, I like the "we're from the government, we're here to help you" bit too. They're going to switch us to digital so they can sell all that freed up bandwidth to the highest bidder, then use our tax dollars to subsidize poor broadcast tv watchers conversion to digital.
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 11:54 AM
|
#10
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,203
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cute fuzzy bunny
Either $0 if you're using digital cable or satellite, which will downconvert to analog in the box. $50 for a downconverting tuner for people using broadcast tv. The feds are even supposed to subsidize the cost of the tuner for people below a certain wage level.
|
I had heard it was for everybody, not just below a certain wage... and... for more than 1 TV per household since most have 2 or 3...
But... I could be wrong...
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 12:13 PM
|
#11
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,455
|
We have only one TV (30 years old) in the house. DW is the person who watches TV on a regular basis. My two kids and I only watch it for an hour per week.
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 12:30 PM
|
#12
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Proud
But... I could be wrong...
|
Nope, you're right. Its open to everyone, although there probably wont be enough coupons available for all broadcast tvs.
I know why that was stuck in my head...the majority of broadcast tv users are lower income. Currently 88% of households receive television by cable or satellite...if you believe popular figures foisted by those groups, who probably would like the broadcast tv users to feel uncomfortable sitting in their tiny 12% market segment.
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 12:31 PM
|
#13
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Losing my whump
Posts: 22,708
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spanky
My two kids and I only watch it for an hour per week.
|
So then you're really living it up with your extra...$839,000?
__________________
Be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful. Just another form of "buy low, sell high" for those who have trouble with things. This rule is not universal. Do not buy a 1973 Pinto because everyone else is afraid of it.
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 01:37 PM
|
#14
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 517
|
Will my old black and white TV that I bought in 1978 still work?
CJ
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 01:54 PM
|
#15
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
|
According to the article:
Quote:
The commercials are there to get you to buy products -- and they are effective. Economist Juliet Schor estimated that for every hour of TV a person watches each week, he or she will increase his or her annual spending by about $200...
|
So if the average person watches 31.5 hours/week, that means $6,300 of additional annual spending. i.e. the person would have put an additional $6,300 into retirement savings if he/she didn't watch any TV.
Now the median annual wage is around $40,000, so this means that average people spend about 16% of their before tax income on things that they wouldn't buy without TV ads.
I find this intriguing. I've wondered if the continuous stream of advertising isn't a reason for modern Americans' low savings rate (and high number of hours worked).
But, 16% of before tax income sounds way too high. I would believe 2-3%.
Any thoughts?
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 02:30 PM
|
#16
|
Dryer sheet aficionado
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Independent
According to the article:
Any thoughts?
|
Yes; as Sam already said, this is a silly, hyperbolic article, and, for me, reinforces the fact that there are far, far too many personal finance writers with far, far too little to write about...
Wait a second. You mean, if I save money now, it compounds throughout the years to generate even more money!? Super!! So glad I tune in every week for this earth-shattering insight!!!
If TV costs a million, then I am sure I could sit down and, in short order, freelance an article attempting to patronize you into believing that, without your car, you'd be worth ~$17,264,198 more than you currently are.
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 04:07 PM
|
#17
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 47,472
|
Frank gently teases me sometimes because I always mute commercials. I don't want to be influenced by them and I find most of them to be offensive. When he says, "You know the commercial for xyz...?" I just look blank because I really don't.
Most of the items on the list just don't cost me anything. Entertainment center? I'm 59 years old and I have never had an entertainment center. If I ever decide to get one, it will be a furniture purchase, for the cabinets and shelving, and won't have much to do with watching or not watching TV.
They forgot to add in the cost of microwave popcorn for Saturday night TV watching. DCA that amount into a good mutual fund, and in 50 years you'll have almost $2000. Goodie goodie gumdrops.
__________________
Already we are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon we shall be lost in its unshored, harbourless immensities. - - H. Melville, 1851.
Happily retired since 2009, at age 61. Best years of my life by far!
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 04:56 PM
|
#18
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 696
|
Interesting article, thanks Bob!!
IMHO, If you replace just 1 hour a day of mindlessly watching television with reading for one hour per day about your chosen profession, you'd make far more than 1 million dollars. You'd become an expert in your field and at least triple your income in a short period of time.
__________________
Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called EVERYBODY, and they meet at the bar.--Drew Carey
|
|
|
Its correlated with metro areas
07-18-2007, 06:50 PM
|
#19
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 275
|
Its correlated with metro areas
With 48 channels here, the need for cable is weak. Many are foreign language, but few watch more than a select few channels.
|
|
|
07-18-2007, 10:23 PM
|
#20
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,455
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex
Interesting article, thanks Bob!!
IMHO, If you replace just 1 hour a day of mindlessly watching television with reading for one hour per day about your chosen profession, you'd make far more than 1 million dollars. You'd become an expert in your field and at least triple your income in a short period of time.
|
Spending an hour on learning more about investing is probably more rewarding than reading about your profession.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|