Montecfo
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Yes it certainly is!
It’s a different world now in fixed income. Some like Vanguard are forecasting future equity returns in the 4%-5% range. You can get that and more now, locked in, with little risk to capital.
Debt
It’s a different world now in fixed income. Some like Vanguard are forecasting future equity returns in the 4%-5% range. You can get that and more now, locked in, with little risk to capital.
With my assets primarily in taxable accounts I will not be doing a bond tent given the tax costs.
Instead, I chose the "never-refilled" cash bucket strategy mentioned here:
Cash bucket
"...we only withdraw from that cash cushion if the investment portfolio goes more than 20% underwater.
Once the cash cushion is exhausted we tap the investment portfolio and we never replenish the cash account again.
So, think of the cash cushion strictly as an insurance policy against Sequence Risk for the first few years after retirement."
As a low cost place to invest Vanguard is very good. But predictions? I don’t know.
As a low cost place to invest Vanguard is very good. But predictions? I don’t know.
Wow, this is a really interesting idea. I've inheritantly been doing this but hadn't mathmatically proven out why. I'd just done some back of the envelope calculations that indicated avoiding draws after a deep decline is a very good idea.
It’s a bucket system of sorts.
https://www.theretirementmanifesto.com/how-to-build-a-retirement-paycheck/
Yep.Yes it is, and I've set up my portfolio as a bucket strategy as well. The aha moment for me on the above description related to two things I hadn't expressively understood: a) a ~10% increase in funds covers the sequence of returns risk and acts as insurance, as opposed to the the Bucket Strategy describing the cash need as covering 1-3 years of living expenses; same concept but described slightly differently; and b) no need to replenish the bucket once used. The Bucket Strategy talks about 1-3 years, 7-10 years, and 10+ years, but I didn't think about those timelines in terms of a "one-time" set for a 10 year period. I always struggled with the concept of replenishing the bucket. If you don't have to replenish the bucket because SoRR hits, then it really solidifies the strategy. I always intuitively felt this but EarlyRetirementNow provides the math.
All of this to say that setting up a Bond ladder over a 10 year period is a pretty good strategy.
Yep.
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/05/15/fed...uts-this-year-even-if-theres-a-recession.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/05/18/dal...ta-doesnt-justify-pausing-rate-hikes-yet.html
here you go Freedom56 ... im sure you already read these but in case anyone missed them.. guess that means we may see better FI rates
Bought some of this as a flyer. 8.4% yield.
49326EEG4
Interesting play. On the other side, seems like there is some supply as someone thinks Keybank is going down, they sold 5 million worth @ 82.316
^^^ this is part of ongoing noise from the Fed. I wish they would stop muddying the water.
JPow said they will pause. I bet they pause.
Only the dumb Wall Street bond traders are betting on rate cuts this year. The irony is that they are setting up their bond funds for more horrific losses when long rates start to rise. We are well over a year into rate cuts and cash now yields 2 to 3 times more than most passive bond funds. This is the "golden period" for fixed income investing. We are not going back to the days of easy money anytime soon.
If we all think back, it was hard for the Fed to shift its narrative from "low rates for an extended period" to a real inflationary environment. I think the fact that JPow had stated interest rates would stay near zero through 2023 and possibly longer created a credibility hurdle.Yes, he reinforced it today.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/powell-signals-june-pause-says-154924317.html
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell gave a clear signal he is inclined to pausing interest-rate increases next month and said that tighter credit conditions could mean the policy peak will be lower.
If we all think back, it was hard for the Fed to shift its narrative from "low rates for an extended period" to a real inflationary environment. I think the fact that JPow had stated interest rates would stay near zero through 2023 and possibly longer created a credibility hurdle.
They like to jawbone a long view, which honestly is not compatible with doing their job as effectively as they could.
But the last thing they want to do is signal something in the short term and then do something different.
Should I load the boat on 48-60 month no call mid 4% CDs now rather than wait for something above 5%?
I'm having trouble finding those. Where are they?
What does the rest of your allocation look like?What do you think Monte will long rates creep up after the great pause? You think inflation is going to drop like a stone? Should I load the boat on 48-60 month no call mid 4% CDs now rather than wait for something above 5%?