- Joined
- Apr 14, 2006
- Messages
- 23,065
Maybe I'm kinda thick, but it took me awhile to fully understand that the author was talking about a very specific type of wealth. IMO, the language was much broader than that - or at least a lot of people interpreted it to mean something much broader than what might have been intended [real millionaires are low key, people acting rich are just pretending]. Ordinary people not born to wealth can also be millionaires - AND - engage in conspicuous consumption. The two things are not mutually exclusive. They don't have to be "really rich" just really high income. Is there really anything morally wrong with that if it doesn't endanger their financial stability? I just think that MND (and others of the same genre) are more about a certain cultural anti-materialism narrative than they are about facts.
As I have always said, here and elsewhere, it's your money and you can do what you like with it. But for an ordinary guy from the trailer park like me, it took an awful lot of hard work and LBYM to become a millionaire and I don't intend to piss it away by spending frivolously now.