- Joined
- Nov 27, 2014
- Messages
- 9,203
I would speak to a lawyer and stop posting on the internet. As they say on TV - Anything you say can and will be used against you.
+1. But I wouldn't send the written memo until after I had spoken with a good employment lawyer.
No performance reviews in the file? No documentation of poor performance? Young folks of color assuming your responsibilities? No written or verbal explanation as to how they arrived at this termination decision? Yes, you have a case. In grad school and more recently I've seen case summaries and known of cases in which plantiffs won lawsuits that were less clear-cut than this.
If I understand your statement, I don't see how the past years are damages. You took the job for less pay. If you left this job for another, would they still be damages in your mind?But ... I left a lot of money on the table leaving the previous for-profit job with profit sharing, bonuses, etc. I could easily establish 300K-400K in damages from the past five years, based on what I had been earning. Had I stayed in that job another few years, we'd be better off financially without a doubt.
But ... I left a lot of money on the table leaving the previous for-profit job with profit sharing, bonuses, etc. I could easily establish 300K-400K in damages from the past five years, based on what I had been earning. Had I stayed in that job another few years, we'd be better off financially without a doubt.
Every previous job I've left, there have been tears, cake, happy hour afterward, well-wishes, heartfelt words of "we'll miss you." This situation ... wow. This is new territory for me, not being wanted and valued. I doubt there will be even a one-line email announcing my departure. On the advice of counsel, most likely.
Talking to a few attorneys might be worthwhile. They would know best if they can make a case that would amount in a settlement.
At my last megacorp, they would give in to anyone to not sue. I fired someone for not showing up at work and HR made me pay them for the days they weren't there because it was cheaper than going to court. Our HR person told me that juries in termination cases were very unpredictable, so the company could have facts on their side but a jury might still give a large settlement. So they avoided going to court as much as possible.
A well worded letter from an employment attorney might get you a nice severance package. One of my friends did this and got quite a bit of money just with a letter. They had been fired for poor performance without notice, and after a good performance review and bonus, which violated the company's own termination procedures in the employee handbook. It probably wouldn't have sit too well with a jury since they didn't even have the facts or documentation on their side.
If I understand your statement, I don't see how the past years are damages. You took the job for less pay. If you left this job for another, would they still be damages in your mind?
This was my experience as well but then it appears we are both in California. I worked for the public sector and even there it was cheaper to provide several months severance pay than the cost of a lawsuit and then the uncertainty of the outcome.
That’s why I would recommend to anyone to speak to an employment attorney about negotiating a severance package.
That’s usually the best bet for a more positive outcome.
Unless they are violating the law.
I can say that simply mentioning the word "lawyer" will sometimes be enough. I was told by my superior that one of my reports was in HR being let go. I was to make sure that nothing happened afterwards. How I was to do that, I don't know. An hour or so later, I saw him working at his desk. It runed out that he said the "L" word and things changed in a hurry. He was there, but his coworker was no longer. Strange things happen when the management is afraid of lawyers.
All I can say is it ain't over 'till it is over. I have witnessed many company changes in the last few minutes of what was, a plan.
I understand that he thought the job would continue and that's a loss from this point on, but I don't see how you can look back at the years he accepted lower pay willingly. Or maybe I should get a job at McDonalds and get fired, then sue because I could have gone back to IT and earned six figures.Most likely the OP means he didn't think he would get kicked to the curb and be without a job... he could have stayed at the corp gig and he could quit that now and have enough money to just volunteer. They don't say no good deed goes unpunished for nothing.
I understand that he thought the job would continue and that's a loss from this point on, but I don't see how you can look back at the years he accepted lower pay willingly. Or maybe I should get a job at McDonalds and get fired, then sue because I could have gone back to IT and earned six figures.
Thanks. Double income, no kids. House paid off and we're not going anywhere (though it's a three-level house so I'm not counting on staying here forever and ever).
I'd say we can live very comfortably on 70K a year; less if we have to but I like to visit my relatives in Hawaii a couple times a year, etc. I can't see ever retiring and need to do something besides volunteering too. I'd shrivel and die without having at least a barista-type job where I earn at least something.
.
As the old saying, be careful what you wish for. Would you want to continue this job after getting lawyered up and resulting in them keeping you on? It sounds like your time there is done, the question is whether you have an actual case for any discrimination claim.
As the old saying, be careful what you wish for. Would you want to continue this job after getting lawyered up and resulting in them keeping you on?
I would think that goal here would not to keep one's job but to gain compensation for your departure/dilemma/discrimination.
As I noted above, a friend of mine got 2 year's pay and benefits resulting from his 'lawyering up'.
They avoid "violating the law" by firing you without any meaningful explanation. A simple, "we've decided to go another direction" is typically all they say. They have to follow certain administrative procedures such as giving you your final pay on the day they terminate you and a few other things depending on your state. But they are not obligated to show you had a performance issue.
What "law" are you referring to?
Under the laws enforced by EEOC, it is illegal to discriminate against someone (applicant or employee) because of that person's race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. It is also illegal to retaliate against a person because he or she complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.