 |
What is the downside of $1 million in individual Muni Bond Portfolio?
04-06-2008, 08:28 PM
|
#1
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 464
|
What is the downside of $1 million in individual Muni Bond Portfolio?
Assuming 30 yr bonds yielding 5%. You get $50,000 of after tax income/yr.
Purchasing power deteriorate over 30 years is bad but still keep $1 million at manturity.
Annuity a better choice?
mP
|
|
|
 |
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
04-06-2008, 08:58 PM
|
#2
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: west bloomfield MI
Posts: 2,223
|
will that much tax free income trigger AMT? Part of AMT is muni bond income, I think.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. One person's stupidity is another person's job security.
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 09:01 PM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,433
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Disappointed
Purchasing power deteriorate over 30 years is bad but still keep $1 million at manturity.
|
The $1 million is also worth less in today's dollars.
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 09:14 PM
|
#4
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jIMOh
will that much tax free income trigger AMT? Part of AMT is muni bond income, I think.
|
Non-AMT bonds will help........but inflation will eat that portfolio for a snack.........
__________________
Consult with your own advisor or representative. My thoughts should not be construed as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results (love that one).......:)
This Thread is USELESS without pics.........:)
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 09:21 PM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,455
|
A pure bond portfolio will have a hard time to keep up with inflation. You may want to increase holdings of stock and/or TIPs/IBonds.
__________________
May we live in peace and harmony and be free from all human sufferings.
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 09:27 PM
|
#6
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,732
|
A lot less. At 3% inflation $1,000,000 is equivalent to $411K in 30 years.
That said there is a lot of crazy turmoil in the muni market, due to the problems of MBIA, and other bond insurers. This has widened the yield differences between Muni's and treasuries to historically high levels. The studies that have come out recently seem to show that the default risk of a relatively low rated Muni A or BBB are in reality closer to a AAA corporate bond.
I also think that odds are very good that we will see a rise in top tax brackets, and/or the tax rates capital gains, and/or dividends. All of which wil make Munis are relatively more attractive in coming years.
I think having a $1 mill portfolio of muni consisting of 20-40 individual issue and staggered maturities as major portion of your retirement income, might make sense in some cases. Obviously you wanted to have a additional taxable income in order to benefit from owning munis. I think you'd also want to construct the rest of your assets to be pretty inflation resistance (e.g. Real estate, maybe commodities, and equities.)
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 09:51 PM
|
#7
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 464
|
For a 20% tax bracket (15% fed, 5% state), it is an euqivalent of 6.25% pretax. What will equity return be during the next 30 years?
You also get to spend the 5% interest each year = worth more when spend it yearly and not let it sit in capital gain.
S&P 500 return is higher historically, but unless you cash in your gain, your gain also worth less in the future, your initial invested amount also worth less 30 years from now as well.
Perhaps, invest in DVY (decent divident - pay taxes on it) and hope for additional capital gain to keep up with inflation?
Boy, planning for income in retirement is becoming complicated.
mP
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 09:58 PM
|
#8
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 137
|
AMT isn't triggered by Treasury bond income in my experience.
I judged the long bond as a good investment a few years ago. I'm still getting 5.25%-5.5% interest with tax considerations (while interest rates have continued to tank), including capital gains it goes up to 8% annualized or so I guess. You can sell and go short as rates drop.
|
|
|
04-06-2008, 11:27 PM
|
#9
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 1,701
|
Private-purpose muni bonds (for stadiums, etc) count towards AMT - most do not.
__________________
learn, work, save, invest, fire
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 05:49 AM
|
#10
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central, Ohio, USA
Posts: 2,635
|
It will have an impact on percent of SS taxed also within that 30 year period for you.
__________________
Vietnam Veteran, CW4 USA, Retired 1979
|
|
|
04-07-2008, 08:22 AM
|
#11
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 39,861
|
50k of after tax income loses 1/3 of it's purchasing power after only 15 years at 3% inflation. It loses half when compared to the overall standard of living over that same period.
If one's life expectancy is currently 30 years, but in 30 years another 15 years is added, there is not enough money to avoid a serious decline in living standard.
If, for some reason, tax policy were to change and the muni tax advantage were eliminated, the bonds wold probably continue paying the coupon but at the same time decline significantly in value.
If the sector were to suffer a financial misfortune, both the coupons and the face values might incur significant losses.
If long term interest rates were to increase steadily over the next decade, the bonds would lose considerable value.
Diversification is important in portfolio management - moreso when it is the primary source of income. Muni yields are compelling right now, but no asset class should represent one's entire portfolio.
Michael
|
|
|
 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|