|
|
11-19-2011, 02:24 PM
|
#21
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,171
|
I have no bonds, CD, or mutual funds with a duration much over 2 years. Well, I do have two 5 yeard CD's with a bank that has a 60 day penalty for early withdrawal. That penalty is low enough that I can break the CD and still do at least as well as buying a two year CD. However, now that a credit union has been able to increase its penalty retroactively, I would not buy another. Risk is for stocks and longer bonds. Not CD's.
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy
The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
11-19-2011, 02:26 PM
|
#22
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
|
We will not see "high" rates on savings and "safe" investments any time in the foreseeable future, IMO. Slightly higher? Maybe. But I think there's just WAY too much cash looking for safe harbors to expect "normal" interest rates any time this decade.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
|
|
|
11-19-2011, 02:56 PM
|
#23
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,171
|
With the Federal Govt adding over $1,000,000,000,000 (one trillion dollars) to the deficeit every year, I can understand the Feds not wanting to see interest rates rise. How do they explain this to the citizens when they have to pay, say 5%, on this amount of money?
We do have the best government money can buy. To bad, we don't have the money to buy it!!
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy
The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
|
|
|
11-19-2011, 05:26 PM
|
#24
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 360
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29
We will not see "high" rates on savings and "safe" investments any time in the foreseeable future, IMO. Slightly higher? Maybe. But I think there's just WAY too much cash looking for safe harbors to expect "normal" interest rates any time this decade.
|
This is the optimist view. If/when foreign dollars decide US bonds are not a good buy......
|
|
|
11-19-2011, 05:54 PM
|
#25
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamG
This is the optimist view. If/when foreign dollars decide US bonds are not a good buy......
|
On the contrary. Foreign dollars mean US$ remitted abroad to pay for goods imported into the US. Those $$ have no place else to go so they are recycled back into US Treasuries. If by some good fortune the US should import less and produce more domestically, there would be less need to emit US treasury bonds. Domestic purchases by institutions, such as pension funds and investors, should satisfy gov't financing needs and then some.
I agree with Ziggy.
|
|
|
11-19-2011, 08:00 PM
|
#26
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
On the contrary. Foreign dollars mean US$ remitted abroad to pay for goods imported into the US. Those $$ have no place else to go so they are recycled back into US Treasuries.
|
I always find this assertion hard to understand. It may be correct, but I just can't see how. Say I am a Vietnamese factory owner. I ship my shirts, and Walmart pays me with dollars. It seems that I could join with others and buy ships, or oil storage depots, or natural gas fields with these dollars. Although someone would always be getting these dollars in these transactions, they do not have to go into long term US bonds. Perhaps very short term bonds, perhaps the heroin trade as working capital. True that the $$s would never be destroyed, but if the world truly lost confidence in them their value should approach zero.
If there were more eagerness to buy stuff, or even corporate stock than bonds, bonds should become relatively less expensive, and it should be harder to sell new issues.
Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
|
|
|
11-19-2011, 08:28 PM
|
#27
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Kerrville,Tx
Posts: 3,361
|
Note with the low interest rates the penalties for early withdrawal of CD's are quite low (like 6 months interest or less than 1%) from most banks a few have toughened the penalties recently however. If you can still get the old penalty, then it makes sense to go with a long term CD and if the rates go up 2-3% take the penalty as you will be ahead at the end of the day (and the penalty can be deducted against the interest recieved)
|
|
|
11-19-2011, 09:54 PM
|
#28
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: the City of Subdued Excitement
Posts: 5,588
|
Maybe. I am thinking of getting rid of my bond funds (<5% of my assets) as interest rates can only go higher from here. Maybe put the money into Wellesley. (I know, they have bonds, too, but I won't have to think about it.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan
I have lots of bonds within Wellesley and Target Retirement Funds in VG and Fidelity.
The only bond fund I'm invested in is a VG short term bond fund which should recover well enough for my needs in a rising interest environment.
The only individual bonds I hold are I-Bonds.
|
I-bonds
Interesting, Alan.
I also have Wellesley (thanks, Unc!) and a VG short-term bond fund.
I do not trust target funds. I can do that myself.
No I-bonds. I think I missed the boat on them.
__________________
I have outlived most of the people I don't like and I am working on the rest.
|
|
|
11-20-2011, 03:11 AM
|
#29
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: midwestern city
Posts: 4,061
|
No. I will keep my focus on CDs, municipal bonds, and cash.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jIMOh
Are you planning to make any changes now or in near future when the fed suggests they will raise short term interest rates?
|
__________________
Very conservative with investments. Not ER'd yet, 48 years old. Please do not take anything I write or imply as legal, financial or medical advice directed to you. Contact your own financial advisor, healthcare provider, or attorney for financial, medical and legal advice.
|
|
|
11-20-2011, 06:17 AM
|
#30
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by haha
I always find this assertion hard to understand. It may be correct, but I just can't see how. Say I am a Vietnamese factory owner. I ship my shirts, and Walmart pays me with dollars. It seems that I could join with others and buy ships, or oil storage depots, or natural gas fields with these dollars. Although someone would always be getting these dollars in these transactions, they do not have to go into long term US bonds. Perhaps very short term bonds, perhaps the heroin trade as working capital. True that the $$s would never be destroyed, but if the world truly lost confidence in them their value should approach zero.
If there were more eagerness to buy stuff, or even corporate stock than bonds, bonds should become relatively less expensive, and it should be harder to sell new issues.
Ha
|
Hello Ha
The reason the $$ used to import stuff end up back in US bonds is the Chinese factory owner has to exchange his $$ for local currency through the Central Bank. The exchange rate is fixed so the factory owners doesn't get as much money as he would like, and Gov't policies discourage consumption so he either saves or invests locally. The Central Bank cannot spend the money so it buys bonds, and because it intends to control the exchange rate, it is forced to buy mostly US$ denominated instruments.
If those exporters (China, Germany, Japan, OPEC) consumed more or allowed their exchange rates to rise and global trade imbalances might improve.
|
|
|
11-20-2011, 03:41 PM
|
#31
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,455
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulligan
I was about to lump some cash into a 5 year CD about a year ago that paid 3.75%. Then I thought what idiot would tie up their money for that. I know the answer to that question now.... Me. If I could go back in time!
|
Yes, only if we could roll back the time or travel into the future so that we can make a informed decision on investing and other matters.
__________________
May we live in peace and harmony and be free from all human sufferings.
|
|
|
11-20-2011, 08:27 PM
|
#32
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 103
|
I dropped my intermediate (and longer) term bonds last week, and exchanged them for very short term treasuries. I decided to just keep my risk in my stock holdings, and not get too greedy chasing yield when the party stands a good chance of ending soon. I banked some nice gains on my TIPS and intermediate term corporates. The purpose of the treasuries will be primarily capital preservation, reduced volatility, and used to rebalanced my stock fluctuations.
|
|
|
11-21-2011, 09:22 AM
|
#33
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,375
|
I would think one's AA would anticipate market changes, not react to them. I mean if you think interest rates are going to rise and thus likely hurt most investments other than short-term bonds/notes, why wouldn't you have allocated or moved there already? Continually reacting seems like a good way to keep your total return down.
|
|
|
11-21-2011, 09:42 AM
|
#34
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,154
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan
No.
|
+1
|
|
|
11-21-2011, 09:47 AM
|
#35
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,154
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jIMOh
The lowering of interest rates over the last 5-10 years created a GREAT period to be a bond investor. Are you planning to make any changes now or in near future when the fed suggests they will raise short term interest rates?
|
Don't just do something, Stand there.
|
|
|
11-21-2011, 10:01 AM
|
#36
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
Hello Ha
The reason the $$ used to import stuff end up back in US bonds is the Chinese factory owner has to exchange his $$ for local currency through the Central Bank. The exchange rate is fixed so the factory owners doesn't get as much money as he would like, and Gov't policies discourage consumption so he either saves or invests locally. The Central Bank cannot spend the money so it buys bonds, and because it intends to control the exchange rate, it is forced to buy mostly US$ denominated instruments.
If those exporters (China, Germany, Japan, OPEC) consumed more or allowed their exchange rates to rise and global trade imbalances might improve.
|
Michael, can't the Chinese government use $$ to buy all the hard assets all around the world that they are buying? Steel for their pipelines and high rise buildings. Coal.
If George Soros could single-handedly break The Bank of England, surely the vastly wealthier Chinese government could upset the US bond market? In fact, the rate of US bond buying by the Chinese has varied widely from quarter to quarter. There must be something else they are doing when they are not buying.
Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
|
|
|
11-21-2011, 12:23 PM
|
#37
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by haha
Michael, can't the Chinese government use $$ to buy all the hard assets all around the world that they are buying? Steel for their pipelines and high rise buildings. Coal.
If George Soros could single-handedly break The Bank of England, surely the vastly wealthier Chinese government could upset the US bond market? In fact, the rate of US bond buying by the Chinese has varied widely from quarter to quarter. There must be something else they are doing when they are not buying.
Ha
|
That's what is happening.
China's central bank prints remembi and buys the $US from the exporter. The independent Central Bank, together with the central gov't, encourage savings by both limiting both consumer credit and the import of consumer goods. So the local currency is put in the bank at negative real rates, and the bank then lends that money to business for new industrial projects. They import lots of raw materials, which is why those prices have risen so much. It is also why there is so much inflationary pressure in China.
The Central Bank buys bonds directly from the US gov't and also in secondary markets, and in the short term transactions cannot be tracked. It looks irregular but it is not. Rest assured, however, that they will continue to buy US and Euro bonds as long as they have trade surplus with these regions.
China cannot afford to upset the bond market. If the US Treasury bond suddenly lost substantial value it could make China's Central Bank insolvent.
|
|
|
11-22-2011, 01:00 PM
|
#38
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,558
|
I think that that could change fairly quickly though. A lot can change in a decade.
A positive scenario--
The economy recovers. The Fed starts sopping up the liquidity that it has pumped into the market, removing a fair amount of the cash looking for safe harbors. People start investing their money in the next big thing (tech stocks/real estate/ green technology, tulip bulbs, etc). As these investments start increasing in value, people start demanding real interest in their cash accounts.
A negative scenario--
The Fed prints too much money and inflation kicks in hard. People flee to gold/guns/MRI's/Oil/collectibles in a desparate attempt to get the depreciating dollars out of their hands. Interest rates rise as people require greater returns to hold cash.
Real interest rates are negative right now. I don't think that will be the case indefinately.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29
We will not see "high" rates on savings and "safe" investments any time in the foreseeable future, IMO. Slightly higher? Maybe. But I think there's just WAY too much cash looking for safe harbors to expect "normal" interest rates any time this decade.
|
|
|
|
11-22-2011, 02:02 PM
|
#39
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,056
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed_The_Gypsy
Maybe. I am thinking of getting rid of my bond funds (<5% of my assets) as interest rates can only go higher from here. Maybe put the money into Wellesley. (I know, they have bonds, too, but I won't have to think about it.)
I-bonds
Interesting, Alan.
I also have Wellesley (thanks, Unc!) and a VG short-term bond fund.
I do not trust target funds. I can do that myself.
No I-bonds. I think I missed the boat on them.
|
I lucked out on I-Bonds, buying most of them back when they had decent fixed rate components and when the limit was $30k / person / year. Part of the attraction at the time is that the accumulated interest is also tax-deferred.
I moved into Target Funds once I RE'ed for simplification so it is easy for DW, so she doesn't have to worry about re-balancing, and the VG 2010 fund reduced the number of funds from 4 to 1.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 08:57 AM
|
#40
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Nowhere, 43N Latitude, NY
Posts: 9,037
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jIMOh
The lowering of interest rates over the last 5-10 years created a GREAT period to be a bond investor. Are you planning to make any changes now or in near future when the fed suggests they will raise short term interest rates?
|
I own VWALX, VMLTX, VWITX, and of course...psssst Wellsley.
Now that my school taxes are fully paid for the year, I recently reinstated DCA to VWITX for the purpose of overall bond MF diversification, not in response to anything in the market.
I still contribute to VMLTX.
No DCA to VWALX as I have already reached my target principal amount in that fund. No changes to VWINX are planned.
__________________
"All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them." - Walt Disney
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|