Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Which International fund is less risky?
Old 08-25-2014, 05:19 PM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
slowsaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Norcal, Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 246
Which International fund is less risky?

I am trying to decide which Vanguard International fund is more or less risky:

* VTMGX (Vang Developed Markets Index), or
* VTIAX (Vang Tot Intl Stock)

Of course, Vanguard gives them both a "5" in their "Risk Potential" category, so maybe it's a moot question. Still, here are the other factors I am trying to weigh:

1) Expense ratio: 0.09% vs. 0.14% gives VTMGX an advantage because it's cheaper.

2) Number of stocks: 1369 vs. 5673 gives VTIAX an advantage, because it's more diversified.

3) Taxes: VTMGX used to be called a "tax managed" fund, but they have recently dropped that description, so I'm not sure how to compare these.

4) Countries: VTMGX is [60% Europe, 40% Pacific], while VTIAX is (approx) [45% Europe, 30% Pacific, 18% Emerging Markets, 7% Canada]. Advantage?

This last one is tricky (for me). One might say the VTIAX wins simply because it's more diversified, but it's hard not to "guess" that Europe will stay flat and Emerging Markets won't be flat (up or down?).

5) Other "risk" factors I'm not considering?

I appreciate your thoughts on this.
slowsaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 08-25-2014, 05:44 PM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
youbet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,022
What do you mean by "risky?"

Volitility?

Liklihood of meeting your long range investment goals over time?

Etc.

What are you looking for? Just saying "risky" doesn't cut it.
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
youbet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 05:57 PM   #3
Recycles dryer sheets
slowsaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Norcal, Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by youbet View Post
What do you mean by "risky?"

Volitility?

Liklihood of meeting your long range investment goals over time?

Etc.

What are you looking for? Just saying "risky" doesn't cut it.
All of the above.
slowsaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 06:04 PM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
photoguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,301
You can check past drawdowns on morning star and see how they did in p past bears. The one with em is probably slightly more volatile.

Personally I prefer developed markets because I have a separate fund just for em. But I wouldn't hesitate to go with total international eithet

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Early Retirement Forum mobile app
photoguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2014, 07:24 PM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
This is a very easy question to answer. Which fund has more small-cap stocks and emerging markets stocks? Small-cap stocks are riskier than large-cap stocks … that's why there is a "small-cap premium". Emerging markets stocks are riskier than developed market stocks.

OK, I'll let readers figure out which of the OP's two international funds is riskier. That means the other one is less risky and should have a lower expected performance over the long term.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Less is more; Living in less than 1,000 sq ft Frugalityisthenewblack Other topics 43 09-25-2010 02:52 AM
Corporate less risky than treasury bills. clifp FIRE and Money 3 03-24-2010 11:53 AM
Emerging tech fund~ too risky for teachers? mickeyd FIRE and Money 9 11-17-2006 02:48 PM
Income: More is less? Less is more? Sam FIRE and Money 9 08-19-2006 08:01 PM
Is google becoming less and less useful for searches or what? cute fuzzy bunny Other topics 15 03-03-2006 12:26 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.