perinova said:
Also there is way on Fidelity online to cancel a trade which hadn't occur.
It seems to me that the differences are in the policies instituted (by mutual fund companies) and how they may interprest certain SEC regulations and their fundamental beliefs and goals. If you read VGs liturature, they tell you to go elsewhere if you trade frequently. On the regualtory side... I know from experience that if you two different people will interpret regulatory rules (that are fuzzy) differently. Look at GAAP accounting and FASB. Think about how HR works in most large corporations. Nowadays they tend (try) to operate fairly consistently with everyone for fear of being sued. While some of VG practices may not seem convenient... I believe they are trustworthy and take a conservative point of view on how they process transactions.
I believe Vanguard is very conservative (look at Bogle) with these type of issues to be even handed cusotmers so there is no doubt that they are adhering to the laws and regulations. Plus they are a Mutual company. Look at the scandal a few years ago where certain firms were allowing hedge funds to do late trades.
Fidelity on the other hand... Is probably instituting policies that they feel are legal and give them a competitive advantage in the area of customer satisfaction. From their perspective, they probably do not want to lose any customer (naturally). If they are operating in a grey area with regard to canceling trades on mutual funds... I do not know. If fidelity was really interested in your best interest as a customer,
they would lowerer their fees and loads on all funds. Let's face it, canceling trades does not impact Fidelity, rather it potentially impacts the long-time share holders of shares in those funds. Most long-terms share holders are not canceling trades.
All in all, I will stick with VG. I have been with them for about 15 years and am satified. I have had some fidelity funds. In fact we hold one now (in a 401k) mainly because of limited options available. I believe their fees are high and because of that, I believe it puts me at a disadvantage. The proof is in the long-term performance and total return of the investments.
To sum it up VG and Fidelity are in the same industry, but they have fundamentally different attitudes and base beliefs... not to mention their missions. VG is about giving customers/indirect owners the lowest cost ,fair deal with a no BS approach. Fidelity is a bit more flash and about making boat load of money for shareholders. Nothing wrong with making money... but as a customer, I would like things tilted my way. I look at it like this. over the last 15 years If I had invested with Fidelity instead of VG, I would probably be lighter in the asset dept because of the compounded 1%-1.25% difference in the maint fees. As far as front-end loads go forget it. There are very few funds that I will pay a load to enter. I have done it, but it is very rare.